Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2001 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4

İn vitro antibacterial activities of tilmicosin and cefquinomme alone or in combination againt certain poultry pathogens

Tilmikosin ve sefkuinomun tek başına ve birlikte kullanımının bazı kanatlı patojenlerine karşı in vitro aktivitesi

Pages
577–580
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The antimicrobial combination was additive against P. multocida (FIC=1) and indifferent against O. rhinotracheale (FIC=2).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The antimicrobial activities of cefquinome and tilmicosin were determined in vitro against P. multocida and O. rhinotracheale of poultry origin by serial broth macrodilution.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for cefquinome was 1.562 µg/ml and for tilmicosin was 0.78 µg/ml for both microorganisms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The antimicrobial combination was additive against P. multocida (FIC=1) and indifferent against O. rhinotracheale (FIC=2).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The antimicrobial activities of cefquinome and tilmicosin were determined in vitro against P. multocida and O. rhinotracheale of poultry origin by serial broth macrodilution. Both antibiotics exhibited good in vitro antibacterial activity against the strains tested. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for cefquinome was 1.562 µg/ml and for tilmicosin was 0.78 µg/ml for both microorganisms. To investigate the effects of a combination of cefquinome and tilmicosin, the fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index was determined by checkerboard assay. The antimicrobial combination was additive against P. multocida (FIC=1) and indifferent against O. rhinotracheale (FIC=2).

🔖

Cite This Article

AK, S., KELEŞ, O., BAKIREL, T. (2022). İn vitro antibacterial activities of tilmicosin and cefquinomme alone or in combination againt certain poultry pathogens. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4, 577–580. https://ajindex.com/articles/615698

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Arda, M. ve ark: Kanatlı Hayvan Hastalıkları. Medisan yayın serisi,1990,No: 14, 86-89
  2. McKay, S.G., Morck, D.W., Merrill, J.K., Olson, M.E., Chan, S.C., Pap, K.: Use of tilmicosin for treatment of pasteurellosis in rabbits. AJVR, 1996; 57, 8, 1180-1184
  3. Kirst, H.A., Ose, E.E., Toth, J.E., Willard, K.E., Debone, M., FeltyDuckworth, A.M., Pekarek, R.S.: In vitro and in vivo evaluations of C-20- and C-23- modified derivates of tylosin against veterinary pathogens. The Journal of Antibiotics, 1988; 41, 7, 938-948
  4. Ose, E. E.: In vitro antibacterial properties of EL-870, a new semisynthetic macrolide antibiotic. The Journal of Antibiotics,1987; 40, 2, 190-194
  5. Ose, E.E., Tonkinson, L.V.: Single-dose treatmant of neonatal calf pneumonia with the new macrolide antibiotic tilmicosin. The Veterinary Record, 1988; 1, 123, 367-369
  6. Kaya, S.: Kemoterapötikler. In: S.KAYA, İ.PİRİNÇCİ, A.BİLGİLİ, Veteriner UygulamalI Farmakoloji., cilt 2, s. 283-398. Medisan YayIn serisi No: 28, 1997; ANKARA 7. Kayaalp, O.: Rasyonel Tedavi Yönünden Tibbi Farmakoloji. 1.cilt, 7.nci baskI, Feryal matbaacılık,1994
  7. Şanlı, Y.: Veteriner Klinik Farmakoloji ve ilaçla sağaltım ilkeleri. Medisan Yayınevi, 1999, Ankara
  8. Barker, S., Kappel, L.C., Short, C.R.: Tissue distrubution and clearance of cefquinome in the bovine. Proceedings XVIII World Buiatric Congress, Bologna;1994
  9. Limbert, M., Isert, D., Klesel, N., Markus, A., Seeger, K., Seibert, G., Schr›nner, E.: Antibacterial activities in vitro and in vivo and pharmacokinetics of cefquinome. a new broad-spectrum cephalosporin. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 1991; 35, 1, 14-19
  10. Devriese, L.A., Hommez, J., Vandamme, P., Kersters, K., Haesebrouck F.: In vitro antibiotic sensitivity of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale strains from poultry and wild birds. Veterinary Record, 1995; 21, 435-436
  11. Empel, P. Van., Bosch, H. Van. Den., Loeffen, P.: Identification and serotyping of O. rhinotracheale. J. Clin. Microbiol., 1997; 35: 2, 418-421
  12. Isenberg, H.D.: Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook. Vol. 1, American Society for Microbiology 1325 Massachusetts,1992
  13. Hafez, H.M.: Current status of the laboratory diagnosis of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale ‘ORT’ in poultry. Berl. Münch. Tierarztl. Wschr., 1998; 111,143-145
  14. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards: Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Eighth informational supplement. NCCLS document M 100-S7, vol. 17