Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2002 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of lyophylized duramater and autogenous omental wrappings of grafting sites in experimentally induced facial nerve injury: Part II: Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation

Deneysel fasial sinir yaralanmalarında greft uygulanan bölgenin liyofilize duramater ve otojen omentum ile sarılmasının karşılaştırılması. İkinci bölüm: Histolojik ve Histomorfometrik değerlendirme

Pages
279–284
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Some reference values were obtained from histomorphometric evaluations that will be helpful for further studies, and traumatic injuries of facial nerves can be repaired by free cable grafts and regeneration seemed better when wrapped with AOG.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of wrapping the facial nerve by a lyophylized duramater (LD) or autogenous omental graft (AOG), on nerve regeneration, after experimentally induced facial paralysis, which was created by neurectomy and repaired by autogeneous sural nerve grafts in dogs, was undertaken.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The experimental design was reported.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Some reference values were obtained from histomorphometric evaluations that will be helpful for further studies, and traumatic injuries of facial nerves can be repaired by free cable grafts and regeneration seemed better when wrapped with AOG.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of wrapping the facial nerve by a lyophylized duramater (LD) or autogenous omental graft (AOG), on nerve regeneration, after experimentally induced facial paralysis, which was created by neurectomy and repaired by autogeneous sural nerve grafts in dogs, was undertaken. The experimental design was reported. At the end of the observation period, specimens harvested from the main trunk of the facial nerve arising from the stylomastoid foramen, the repaired site and three branches of this nerve were examined histologically and histomorphometrically with respect to myelin area, axon number and nerve fiber diameter. Reduced fibrosis and improved nerve regeneration were found to be superior in the AOG wrapped group than the others. According to the histomorphometric evaluation of grafted site, the wrapped groups had better values than those of the control group. Wrapping was found to be useful for nerve regeneration in the grafting site and the omentum could be recommended for this purpose. Some reference values were obtained from histomorphometric evaluations that will be helpful for further studies, and traumatic injuries of facial nerves can be repaired by free cable grafts and regeneration seemed better when wrapped with AOG.

Özet

The histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of wrapping the facial nerve by a lyophylized duramater (LD) or autogenous omental graft (AOG), on nerve regeneration, after experimentally induced facial paralysis, which was created by neurectomy and repaired by autogeneous sural nerve grafts in dogs, was undertaken. The experimental design was reported. At the end of the observation period, specimens harvested from the main trunk of the facial nerve arising from the stylomastoid foramen, the repaired site and three branches of this nerve were examined histologically and histomorphometrically with respect to myelin area, axon number and nerve fiber diameter. Reduced fibrosis and improved nerve regeneration were found to be superior in the AOG wrapped group than the others. According to the histomorphometric evaluation of grafted site, the wrapped groups had better values than those of the control group. Wrapping was found to be useful for nerve regeneration in the grafting site and the omentum could be recommended for this purpose. Some reference values were obtained from histomorphometric evaluations that will be helpful for further studies, and traumatic injuries of facial nerves can be repaired by free cable grafts and regeneration seemed better when wrapped with AOG.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZAK, A., ÖZGENCİL, F. E., BEŞALTI, Ö., AKIN, F., TOPLU, N., KUL, O. (2022). Comparison of lyophylized duramater and autogenous omental wrappings of grafting sites in experimentally induced facial nerve injury: Part II: Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2, 279–284. https://ajindex.com/articles/615658

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Kern, T.J. and Erb, H.N.: Facial Neuropathy in Dogs and Cats: 95 Cases (1975 - 1985). JAVMA 1987; 191, (12): 1604 –1609
  2. Parker, A.J., Cusick, P.K., Park, R.D. and Small, E.: Hemifacial Spasms in a Dog. Vet. Rec. 1973; 93: 514 – 516
  3. Braund, K.G., Mehta, J.R., Amling, K.A., Toivio-Kinnucan, M.: Morphologic and Morphometric Study of the Facial Nerve in Clinically Normal Adult Dogs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1991; 52, (11): 1879 – 1882
  4. Lal, A.P. Joseph, T. Chandi, S.M. and Pant, B.: Facial Neurorraphy with Autologous Sural Nerve Graft Using the CO2 Laser in a Primate Model. Neurosurgery 1993; 32, (6): 1011 –1014
  5. McCabe, B. F.: Facial Nerve Grafting. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery 1970; 45, (1): 70 – 75
  6. Laeken, N.V., Manktelow, R.T.: Facial Paralysis: Principles of Treatment. Textbook of Maxillofacial and Reconstructive Surgery, Philadelphia, 581-595, 1992
  7. Özcan, G., Shenaq, S. Mirabi, B. and Spira, M.: Nerve Regeneration in a Bony Bed: Vascularised Versus Nonvascularised Nerve Grafts. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery 1993; 91, (7): 1322 –1330
  8. Thanos, P.K. and Terzis, J.K.: A Histomorphometric Analysis of the Cross-Facial Nerve Graft in the Treatment of Facial Paralysis. Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery 1996; 19, (6): 375 - 382
  9. Beflalt›, Ö., Özak, A., Özgencil, F.E., Bilgihan, E.S., and Ak›n, F.: Comparison of Lyophylized Duramater and Autogenous Omental Wrappings of Grafting Sites in Experimentally Induced Facial Nerve Injury Part I Clinical and Gross Evaluations, Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 2002; 26: 273-278
  10. Luna, L.G.: Manual of Histologic Staining Methods of the Armed Forces Enstitue of Pathology 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Company New York, 1968; 203-204
  11. Lee, H.K., Chung, M.S. and Kim, H.J.: A Comparission of the Passage of Regenerating Axons Through Old Degenerated Nerve Autografts and Fresh Nerve Autografts in Rats. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 1993; 17: 193 –197
  12. Shibata, M., Tsai, T.M., Firell, J. and Breidenbach, W.C.: Experimental Comparison of Vascularized and Nonvascularized Nerve Grafting. The J. of Hand Surgery 1988; 13A, (3): 358 – 365
  13. Quilici, P.J., Vieta, J.O.: The Use of Dura Mater in the Surgical Repair Large Defect of the Abdominal Wall. Surg.Gynecol & Obstetr. 1985; 161: 47-48
  14. Terzis, J.K. and Smith, K.L.: Repair and Grafting of the Peripheral Nerve. Plastic Surgery General Principles, W.B. Saunders Company, 631-697, 1990.