Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2014 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1

Isolation and molecular identifcation of Avibacterium paragallinarum in suspected cases of infectious coryza

Pages
46–49
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Hence, the culture-PCR method can be a practical and simple approach, especially in laboratories with limited specialty inidentifcation of this fastidious organism.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Isolation and identifcation of Avibacterium paragallinarum , the causative agent of infectious coryza, is considered achallenging task in laboratories with limited specialties.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the present study, 14 commercial layer fowls showing the typical symptomsof infectious coryza were subjected to primary isolation followed by polymerase chain reaction confrmation of suspect colonies(culture-PCR).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Hence, the culture-PCR method can be a practical and simple approach, especially in laboratories with limited specialty inidentifcation of this fastidious organism.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Isolation and identifcation of Avibacterium paragallinarum , the causative agent of infectious coryza, is considered achallenging task in laboratories with limited specialties. In the present study, 14 commercial layer fowls showing the typical symptomsof infectious coryza were subjected to primary isolation followed by polymerase chain reaction confrmation of suspect colonies(culture-PCR). Direct PCR assays on infraorbital sinus swab samples were also carried out. Tirty-fve suspected cases of infectiouscoryza in commercial broiler chickens were also screened using direct PCR on infraorbital sinus swabs. In culture-PCR, only 1 of the4 suspected isolates was confrmed as Av. paragallinarum . In comparison, in direct PCR, 5 layer samples were shown to be positive forAv. paragallinarum . All of the broiler samples were negative in the direct PCR assay. Our fndings indicate that primary isolation incombination with PCR can be a simple method for diagnosis of infectious coryza, although with a lower sensitivity than direct PCR.While direct PCR is comparably the more rapid and sensitive test, there will be instances in which the bacterial isolate is needed forfurther use. Hence, the culture-PCR method can be a practical and simple approach, especially in laboratories with limited specialty inidentifcation of this fastidious organism.

🔖

Cite This Article

AZAD, N., MADADGAR, O., ASKARI, M. B., SADRZADEH, A., BLACKALL, P., CHARKHKAR, S. (2022). Isolation and molecular identifcation of Avibacterium paragallinarum in suspected cases of infectious coryza. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1, 46–49. https://ajindex.com/articles/615286

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Blackall PJ, Christensen H, Beckenham T, Blackall LL, Bisgaard M. Reclassifcation of Pasteurella gallinarum, [ Haemophilus] paragallinarum, Pasteurella avium and Pasteurella volantium as Avibacterium gallinarum gen nov., Avibacterium avium comb. Nov. and Avibacterium volanium comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55: 353–362
  2. Hinz KH. Haemophilus paragallinarum (infectious coryza, fowl coryza). In: Jordan FTW and Pattison M, editors. Poultry Diseases. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Saunders, 2002, pp. 52–56
  3. Blackall PJ. Infectious coryza: overview of the disease and new diagnostic options. Clin Microbiol Rev 1999; 12: 627–632
  4. Blackall PJ, Soriano EV. Infectious coryza and related diseases. In: Saif YM, Barnes HJ, Glisson JR, Fadly AM, McDougald LR, Swayne DA, editors. Diseases of Poultry. 12th ed. Ames, IA, USA: Iowa State University Press, 2008, pp. 155–159
  5. Titisak W, Janviriyasopak O, Morris RS, Srihakim S, Kruedener RV. Causes of death found in an epidemiological study of native chickens in Tai villages. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, 1988, pp. 200–202
  6. Blackall PJ, Yamamoto R. Infectious coryza. In: HG Purchase, CH Domermuth, JE Pearson, editors. A Laboratory Manual for the Isolation and Identifcation of Avian Pathogens. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: American Association of Avian Pathologists, 1990, pp. 29–34
  7. Chen X, Mifin JK, Zhang P, Blackall PJ. Development and application of DNA probes and PCR tests for Haemophilus paragallinarum. Avian Dis 1996; 40: 398–407
  8. Corney BG, Diallo IS, Wright L, Hewitson G, De Jong A, Tolosa X, Burrell P, Dufy P, Rodwell B, Boyle DB et al. Rapid and sensitive detection of Avibacterium paragallinarum in the presence of other bacteria using a 5’ Taq nuclease assay: a new tool for diagnosing infectious coryza. Avian Pathol 2008; 37: 599–604
  9. Terzolo HR, Paoltcchi FA, Sandoval VE, Blackall PJ, Yamaguchi T, Iritani Y. Characterization of isolates of Hae mophilus paragallinarum from Argentina. Avian Dis 1993; 37: 310–314
  10. Newton CR. Nucleic acid substrates. In: Newton CR, editor. PCR: Essential Data. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 1995, pp. 24–26
  11. Chen X, Chen Q, Zhang P, Feng W, Blackall PJ. Evaluation of a PCR test for the detection of Haemophilos paragallinarum in China. Avian Pathol 1998; 27: 296–300
  12. Chen X, Song C, Gong Y, Blackall PJ. Further studies on the use of a polymerase chain reaction test for