Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1

Radiographic examination of hip joint geometry in healthy Sivas Kangal dogs

Pages
85–92
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, normal ranges in healthySKDs of proximal femoral and acetabular parameters related to certain hip joint pathologies in humans were presented.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to determine the normal ranges of proximal femoral and acetabular parameters in 26 adult healthySivas Kangal dogs (SKDs).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Significant differences were observed between the sexes in hip axis length (HAL) of 8.03 ± 0.82 cm and 7.47± 0.40 cm, femoral neck axis length-a (FNALa) of 6.40 ± 0.55 cm and 6.09 ± 0.27 cm, FNALb of 5.09 ± 0.47 cm and 4.78 ± 0.31 cm,acetabular width (AW) of 1.62 ± 0.35 cm and 1.37 ± 0.24 cm, femoral shaft diameter (FSD) of 3.11 ± 0.31 cm and 2.88 ± 0.21 cm, andacetabular angle (ACM) of 44.04 ± 3.32° and 42.16 ± 2.94° in males and females, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, normal ranges in healthySKDs of proximal femoral and acetabular parameters related to certain hip joint pathologies in humans were presented.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the normal ranges of proximal femoral and acetabular parameters in 26 adult healthySivas Kangal dogs (SKDs). Significant differences were observed between the sexes in hip axis length (HAL) of 8.03 ± 0.82 cm and 7.47± 0.40 cm, femoral neck axis length-a (FNALa) of 6.40 ± 0.55 cm and 6.09 ± 0.27 cm, FNALb of 5.09 ± 0.47 cm and 4.78 ± 0.31 cm,acetabular width (AW) of 1.62 ± 0.35 cm and 1.37 ± 0.24 cm, femoral shaft diameter (FSD) of 3.11 ± 0.31 cm and 2.88 ± 0.21 cm, andacetabular angle (ACM) of 44.04 ± 3.32° and 42.16 ± 2.94° in males and females, respectively. No significant differences were observedbetween the sexes in femoral shaft cortex width, femoral head diameter, femoral neck diameter, head-neck index, trochanteric width,femoral inclination angle, external acetabular angle, and acetabulum-head index. Males had longer HAL (P < 0.01), FNALa and FNALb(P < 0.05), and AW (P < 0.01) and thicker FSD (P < 0.01) and wider ACM (P < 0.05) than bitches. In this study, normal ranges in healthySKDs of proximal femoral and acetabular parameters related to certain hip joint pathologies in humans were presented.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKIN, İ., SARIERLER, M., YAYGINGÜL, R., DERİNCEGÖZ, O. Ö., TATLI, Z. B. (2022). Radiographic examination of hip joint geometry in healthy Sivas Kangal dogs. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1, 85–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/615249

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Bakır B. Sivas Kangal köpeklerinde kalça ekleminin displazi açısından klinik ve radyolojik değerlendirilmesi. PhD, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey, 1992 (with English abstract)
  2. Güzel N. Kangal köpeklerinde kalça displazisi üzerine çalışmalar. In: Proceedings of the 2nd National Veterinary Surgery Congress; Ankara, Turkey; 1990. pp. 66-69 (with English abstract)
  3. Durmuş AS, Han MC. Hip dysplasia in some breeds of dogs. Doğu An Bölg Araş 2005; 106-109 (in Turkish with English abstract)
  4. Bakır, B, Alkan, İ. Köpeklerde kalça displazisi insidansı. YYÜ Vet Fak Derg 1993; 4: 147-151 (in Turkish)
  5. Koç B. Evaluation of hip dysplasia in Anatolian (Sivas-Kangal) and German Shepherd Dogs. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 1995; 1: 9-21 (in Turkish with abstract in English)
  6. Sarierler M. Comparison of femoral inclination angle measurements in dysplastic and nondysplastic dogs of different breeds. Acta Vet Hung 2004; 52: 245-252
  7. Rowe LJ, Yochum TR. Measurements in skeletal radiology. In: Yochum TR, Rowe LJ, editors. Essentials of Skeletal Radiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005. pp. 197-256
  8. Tönnis D. Congenital Dysplasia and Dislocation of the Hip in Children and Adults. London, UK: Springer-Verlag; 1984
  9. Pulkkinen P, Partanen J, Jalovaara P, Jamsa T. Combination of bone mineral density and upper femur geometry improves the prediction of hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 2004; 15: 274-280
  10. Madsen JS, Svalastoga E. Inclination and antevertion of femoral neck in hip dysplasia and coxarthrosis. Acta Vet Scand 1994; 35: 115-119
  11. Boonen S, Koutri R, Dequeker J, Aerssens J, Lowet G, Nijs J, Verbeke G, Lesaffre E, Geusens P. Measurement of femoral geometry in type I and type II osteoporosis: differences in hip axis length consistent with heterogeneity in the pathogenesis of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 1995; 10: 1908-1912
  12. Delanuay S, Dussault RG, Kaplan PA, Alford BA. Radiographic measurements of dysplastic adult hips. Skeletal Radiol 1997; 26: 75-81
  13. Dueland DJ. Femoral torsion and its possible relations hip to canine hip dysplasia. Vet Surg 1980; 9: 48
  14. Hauptman J, Cardinet III GH, Morgan JP, Guffy M, Wallace LJ. Angles of inclination and anteversion in hip dysplasia in the dog. Am J Vet Res 1985; 46: 2033-2036
  15. Rumph PF, Hathcock JT. A symmetric axis-based method for measuring the projected femoral angle of inclination in dogs. Vet Surg 1990; 19: 328-333
  16. Sarierler M, Güzel