Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 3

Morphological and carcass traits of three chicken genotypes under free-range, semiintensive, and intensive housing systems

Pages
342–352
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Regarding females, drumstick length (11.66 ± 0.25 vs. 10.47 ± 0.23and 10.36 ± 0.31 cm; P = 0.0007), drumstick weight (124.93 ± 13.70 vs. 93.41 ± 2.91 and 86.43 ± 2.51 g; P < 0.0001), and thigh weight(132.85 ± 13.23 vs. 107.68 ± 2.05 and 97.13 ± 3.42 g; P < 0.0001) were higher in intensive birds than free-range and semiintensive systems.In conclusion, RNN and BNN chickens of both sexes had better morphological and carcass traits during the growing stage as comparedto NN.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study evaluated the effect of housing system on morphometric and carcass traits of 3 chicken genotypes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In total,180 cockerels and 180 pullets of 6 weeks old were studied.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Regarding females, drumstick length (11.66 ± 0.25 vs. 10.47 ± 0.23and 10.36 ± 0.31 cm; P = 0.0007), drumstick weight (124.93 ± 13.70 vs. 93.41 ± 2.91 and 86.43 ± 2.51 g; P < 0.0001), and thigh weight(132.85 ± 13.23 vs. 107.68 ± 2.05 and 97.13 ± 3.42 g; P < 0.0001) were higher in intensive birds than free-range and semiintensive systems.In conclusion, RNN and BNN chickens of both sexes had better morphological and carcass traits during the growing stage as comparedto NN.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The present study evaluated the effect of housing system on morphometric and carcass traits of 3 chicken genotypes. In total,180 cockerels and 180 pullets of 6 weeks old were studied. A randomized complete block design in factorial arrangement, with 18experimental units of 20 birds each, was applied. Treatments consisted of 3 genotypes consisting of purebred Naked Neck (NN) birdsand two crossbreeds (Rhode Island Red × Naked Neck = RNN, Black Australorp × Naked Neck = BNN) and 3 housing systems (freerange,semiintensive, and intensive). Regarding males, RNN chickens had the highest weight at slaughter (1491.12 ± 64.10 vs. 1390.30 ±49.15 and 1333.76 ± 37.54 g; P = 0.0009), dressed weight (870.12 ± 32.32 vs. 794.07 ± 24.75 and 724.51 ± 10.50 g; P < 0.0001), and breastweight (158.35 ± 8.03 vs. 128.26 ± 11.06 and 118.37 ± 8.18 g; P < 0.0001) as compared to BNN and NN. In terms of housing system,keel length (10.66 ± 0.15 and 10.42 ± 0.11 vs. 9.93 ± 0.15 cm; P < 0.0004), weight at slaughter (1482.78 ± 50.15 and 1498.02 ± 33.65 vs.1234.37 ± 19.95 g; P < 0.0001), and dressed weight (829.78 ± 37.63 and 829.05 ± 24.74 vs. 729.87 ± 15.49 g; P = 0.0007) were higher insemiintensive and intensive birds as compared to free-range birds. Regarding females, drumstick length (11.66 ± 0.25 vs. 10.47 ± 0.23and 10.36 ± 0.31 cm; P = 0.0007), drumstick weight (124.93 ± 13.70 vs. 93.41 ± 2.91 and 86.43 ± 2.51 g; P < 0.0001), and thigh weight(132.85 ± 13.23 vs. 107.68 ± 2.05 and 97.13 ± 3.42 g; P < 0.0001) were higher in intensive birds than free-range and semiintensive systems.In conclusion, RNN and BNN chickens of both sexes had better morphological and carcass traits during the growing stage as comparedto NN.

🔖

Cite This Article

HUSSAIN, J., AHMAD, S., MAHMUD, A., JAVED, K. (2022). Morphological and carcass traits of three chicken genotypes under free-range, semiintensive, and intensive housing systems. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 3, 342–352. https://ajindex.com/articles/615176

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Khawaja T, Khan SH, Mukhtar N, Parveen A, Ahmed T. Comparative study of growth performance, meat quality and haematological parameters of three-way crossbred chickens with reciprocal F1 crossbred chickens in a subtropical environment. Journal of Applied Animal Research 2013
  2. 41 (3): 300-308. doi: 10.1080/09712119.2013.782869 2. Adebambo AO, Ikeobi CON, Ozoje MO, Oduguwa OO, Adebambo OA. Combining abilities of growth traits among pure and crossbred meat type chickens. Archivos de Zootecnia 2011
  3. Khawaja T, Khan SH, Mukhtar N, Parveen A. Comparative study of growth performance, meat quality and haematological parameters of Fayoumi, Rhode Island Red and their reciprocal crossbred chickens. Italian Journal of Animal Science 2012
  4. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2012.e39 4. Zhao Z, Li J, Li X, Bao J. Effects of housing systems on behaviour, performance and welfare of fast-growing broilers. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 2014
  5. 27 (1): 140-146. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13167 5. Bizeray D, Estevez I, Leterrier C, Faure JM. Influence of increased environmental complexity on leg condition, performance, and level of fearfulness in broilers. Poultry Science 2002
  6. doi: 10.1093/ps/81.6.767 6. Fanatico AC, Pillai PB, Cavitt LC, Emmert JL, Meullenet JF et el. Evaluation of slower growing broiler genotypes grown with and without outdoor access: sensory attributes. Poultry Science 2006
  7. doi: 10.1093/ps/85.2.337 7. Dal Bosco A, Mugnai C, Rosati A, Paoletti A, Caporali S et al. Effect of range enrichment on performance, behavior and forage intake of free-range chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 2014
  8. https:// doi.org/10.3382/japr.2013-00814 8. Fanatico AC, Brewer VB, Owens-Hanning CM, Donoghue DJ, Donoghue AM. Free-choice feeding of free-range meat chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 2013
  9. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2012-00687 9. Castellini C, Berri C, Le Bihan-Duval E, Martino G. Qualitative attributes and consumer perception of organic and free range poultry meat. World’s Poultry Science Journal 2008
  10. 500– 513. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933908000172 10. Batkowska J, Brodacki A, Zieba G, Horbanczuk JO, Lukaszewicz M. Growth performance, carcass traits and physical properties of chicken meat as affected by genotype and production system. Archives Animal Breeding 2015
  11. doi: 10.5194/ aab-58-325-2015 11. Gondwe TN, Wollny CBA. Evaluation of the growth potentia