Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2016 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 5

Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of three promising tilmicosin-loaded lipid nanoparticles in comparison with tilmicosin phosphate following oral administrationin broiler chickens

Pages
540–547
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, TLM-LNPs improved drug BA and PK parameters, especially the TLM-LNC formulation, which suggests an efficient delivery system for TLM.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Tilmicosin (TLM) is a semisynthetic antimicrobial agent used mainly in poultry and cattle, but it has relatively poor oral bioavailability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In four treatment groups (n = 10), each bird was given a single oral dose (20 mg/kg) of a TLM formulation after overnight fasting, and in four control groups (n = 5), the vehicles of those formulations or distilled water were given.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, TLM-LNPs improved drug BA and PK parameters, especially the TLM-LNC formulation, which suggests an efficient delivery system for TLM.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Tilmicosin (TLM) is a semisynthetic antimicrobial agent used mainly in poultry and cattle, but it has relatively poor oral bioavailability. This study was conducted to compare the bioavailability (BA) and main pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of TLM after oral administration of tilmicosin phosphate (TLM-PH) and three newly prepared lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) of TLM including solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs), nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs), and lipid-core nanocapsules (LNCs). Sixty broiler chickens were divided into eight groups. In four treatment groups (n = 10), each bird was given a single oral dose (20 mg/kg) of a TLM formulation after overnight fasting, and in four control groups (n = 5), the vehicles of those formulations or distilled water were given. Plasma TLM concentrations were analyzed using an HPLC method and the related PK parameters (Cmax, Tmax, AUC0 ∞, t1/2, kel, ClB/F, MRT, and Vd/F) were obtained by noncompartmental analysis. The relative bioavailability of TLM-SLNs, TLM-NLCs, and TLM-LNCs were 1.7, 2.7, and 3.6 times, respectively, more than the BA of TLM-PH. Mean Cmax values were 1.21, 1.58, 1.76, and 2.17 μg/mL for TLM-PH, TLM-SLN, TLM-NLC, and TLM-LNC, respectively. In conclusion, TLM-LNPs improved drug BA and PK parameters, especially the TLM-LNC formulation, which suggests an efficient delivery system for TLM.

🔖

Cite This Article

RASSOULI, A., QUSHAWI, A. A., ATYABI, F., PEIGHAMBARI, S. M., SHAMS, G. R., ZOGHİ, M. (2022). Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of three promising tilmicosin-loaded lipid nanoparticles in comparison with tilmicosin phosphate following oral administrationin broiler chickens. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 5, 540–547. https://ajindex.com/articles/615148

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abu-Basha EA, Idkaidek NM, Al-Shunnaq AF. Pharmacokinetics of tilmicosin (Provitil powder and Pulmotil liquid AC) oral formulations in chickens. Vet Res Commun 2007; 31: 477-485
  2. Avci T, Elmas M. Milk and blood pharmacokinetics of tylosin and tilmicosin following parenteral administrations to cows. Sci World J 2014; 2014: 869096
  3. Eraslan G. Effects of different doses of tilmicosin on erythrocyte catalase activity and plasma malondialdehyde levels in chicks. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 2007; 51: 145-147
  4. Jordan FTW, Horrocks BK. The minimum inhibitory concentration of tilmicosin and tylosin for Mycoplasma synoviae and a comparison of their efficacy in the control of Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection in broiler chicks. Avian Dis 1996; 40: 326-334
  5. Chen X, Wang T, Lu M, Zhu L, Wang Y, Zhou W. Preparation and evaluation of tilmicosin-loaded hydrogenated castor oil nanoparticle suspensions of different particle sizes. Int J Nanomed 2014; 9: 2655-2664
  6. Han C, Qi CM, Zhao BK, Cao J, Xie SY, Wang SL, Zhou WZ. Hydrogenated castor oil nanoparticles as carriers for the subcutaneous administration of tilmicosin: in vitro and in vivo studies. J Vet Pharmacol Therap 2008; 32: 116-123
  7. Zhang T, Chen J, Zhang Y, Shen Q, Pan W. Characterization and evaluation of nanostructured lipid carrier as a vehicle for oral delivery of etoposide. Eur J Pharmaceut Sci 2011; 43: 174-179
  8. Plapied L, Duhem N, Des Rieux A, Préat V. Fate of polymeric nanocarriers for oral drug delivery. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 2011; 16: 228-237
  9. Beloqui A, Solinís MA, Gascón AR, Del Pozo-Rodríguez A, Des Rieux A, Préa VT. Mechanism of transport of saquinavir-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers across the intestinal barrier. J Controlled Release 2013; 166: 115-123
  10. Tiwari R, Pathak K. Nanostructured lipid carrier versus solid lipid nanoparticles of simvastatin: comparative analysis of characteristics, pharmacokinetics and tissue uptake. Int J Pharmaceut 2011; 415: 232-243
  11. Severino P, Andreani T, Macedo AS, Fangueiro JF, Santana MHA, Silva AM, Souto EB. Current state-of-art and new trends on lipid nanoparticles (SLN and NLC) for oral drug delivery. J Drug Delivery 2012; 2012: 750891
  12. Battaglia L, Gallarate M. Lipid nanoparticles: state of the art, new preparation methods and challenges in drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2012; 9: 497-508
  13. Shah R, Eldrige D, Palombo E, Harding I. Composition and structure. In: Shah R, Eldridge D, Palombo E, Harding I, editors