Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3

Differences in physico-chemical parameters of goat milk depending on breed type, physiological and environmental factors

Pages
720–728
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Analysed factors and their interactions play an important role in shaping the chemical composition of goatmilk and determine its technological usefulness.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:: The objective of the research was to analyse the technological parameters of milk and assess the impact of selected factors,i.e. the genetic group of goats (improved goats—Saanen crosses vs various crossbreds of unknown genetic origin—breedless goats withdifferent coat for which no breeding books were kept), production season (winter, spring/summer, and autumn), which was associatedwith the stage of lactation (1, 2, and 3), the region where the goats were raised (upland or mountainous areas) and daily yield ( 2.0 kg).
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 480 milk samples were evaluated (203 milk samples from Saanen crosses and 277 from variouscrossbreds of unknown genetic origin).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Analysed factors and their interactions play an important role in shaping the chemical composition of goatmilk and determine its technological usefulness.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

: The objective of the research was to analyse the technological parameters of milk and assess the impact of selected factors,i.e. the genetic group of goats (improved goats—Saanen crosses vs various crossbreds of unknown genetic origin—breedless goats withdifferent coat for which no breeding books were kept), production season (winter, spring/summer, and autumn), which was associatedwith the stage of lactation (1, 2, and 3), the region where the goats were raised (upland or mountainous areas) and daily yield ( 2.0 kg). A total of 480 milk samples were evaluated (203 milk samples from Saanen crosses and 277 from variouscrossbreds of unknown genetic origin). The milk was tested for proximate chemical composition, casein content, active and potentialacidity, coagulation time, and heat stability. All factors analysed were found to significantly affect daily milk yield, potential acidity andcomposition (contents of fat, nonfat dry matter, total protein, and casein). Goat crossbreds of unknown genetic origin produced milkwith better chemical composition, i.e. higher contents of fat, nonfat dry matter, total protein, and casein, and technological parameters—higher heat stability (despite lower daily yield) than Saanen crosses, especially in autumn (end of lactation). The region of production wasalso significant. Goats raised in mountainous areas produced milk with a more favourable chemical composition, i.e. higher content ofdry matter and protein, including casein, but with lower heat stability, in most cases irrespective of the production season. As daily milkyield increased, there was a decrease in the content of fat and nonfat dry matter, including total protein and casein, as well as a reductionin the rennet clotting time. Analysed factors and their interactions play an important role in shaping the chemical composition of goatmilk and determine its technological usefulness.

🔖

Cite This Article

BARLOWSKA, J., PASTUSZKA, R., KROL, J., BRODZIAK, A., TETER, A., LITWINCZUK, Z. (2022). Differences in physico-chemical parameters of goat milk depending on breed type, physiological and environmental factors. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3, 720–728. https://ajindex.com/articles/615130

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. FAOSTAT: Statistics Division (Internet). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2019. Available from: http://faostat.fao.org/. Accessed August 20, 2019
  2. Strzałkowska N, Bagnicka E, Jóźwik A, Krzyżewski J. Concentration of total cholesterol in milk of Polish White Improved goats during the whole lactation. Archiv Tierzucht 2006; 49: 166-173
  3. Biadała A, Konieczny P. Goat’s milk-derived bioactive components – a review. Mljekarstvo 2018; 68 (4): 239-253
  4. Ribeiro AC, Ribeiro SDA. Specialty products made from goat milk. Small Ruminant Research 2010; 89: 225-233
  5. Silanikove N, Leitner G, Merin U, Prosser CG. Recent advances in exploiting goat’s milk: Quality, safety and production aspects. Small Ruminant Research 2010; 89: 110-124
  6. Barłowska J, Litwińczuk Z, Wolanciuk A, Szmatoła T. Chemical composition and selected parameters of technological suitability of caprine milk produced in organic and conventional farms. Italian Journal of Food Science 2013; 25 (1): 105-108
  7. Micari P, Sarullo V, Sidari R, Carid A. Physico-chemical and hygienic characteristics of the calabrian raw milk cheese, Caprino d’Aspromonte. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciiences 2007; 31 (1): 55-60
  8. Vacca GM, Stocco G, Dettori ML, Summer A, Cipolat-Gotet C et al. Cheese yield, cheese-making efficiency, and daily production of six breeds of goats. Journal of Dairy Science 2018; 101: 7817-7832
  9. Cecchinato, A., Bittante G. Genetic and environmental relationships of different measures of individual cheese yield and curd nutrients recovery with coagulation properties of bovine milk. Journal of Dairy Science 2016; 99: 1975-1989
  10. Stocco G, Pazzola M, Dettori ML, Paschino P, Bittante G et al. Effect of composition on coagulation, curd firming, and syneresis of goat milk. Journal of Dairy Science 2018; 101: 9693-9702
  11. Banjare K, Kumar M, Kumar R, Kartikyen S, Goel BK et al. Perspective role of goat milk and products: A review. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2017; 5 (4): 1328-1338
  12. Faka M. Lewis MJ, Grandison AS, Deeth H. The effect of free Ca2+ on the heat stability and other characteristics of low-heat skim milk powder. International Dairy Journal 2009; 19: 386- 392
  13. Park YW, Juárez M, Ramos M, Haenlein GFW. Physicochemical characteristics of goat and sheep milk. Small Ruminant Research 2007; 68: 88-113
  14. Pastuszka R, Barłowska J, Litwińczuk Z. Nutritional value and health-promoting properties of goat milk. Medycyna Wet