Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 6

Identification of Candida strains with nested PCR in bovine mastitis and determination of antifungal susceptibilities

Pages
757–763
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to antifungal test results, the isolates were found to be susceptible to ketoconazole (78.3%) and resistantto flucytosine (91.3%), amphotericin (82.6%), miconazole and nystatin (73.9%), and fluconazole (69.5%).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Mastitis is one of the biggest problems of dairy cattle industries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of260 mastitic milk samples were collected from different farms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to antifungal test results, the isolates were found to be susceptible to ketoconazole (78.3%) and resistantto flucytosine (91.3%), amphotericin (82.6%), miconazole and nystatin (73.9%), and fluconazole (69.5%).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Mastitis is one of the biggest problems of dairy cattle industries. In recent years, fungal agents have been frequently reportedamong the causative agents for mastitis. Among the fungal agents,Candidaspecies are the most common. This study s aims were theisolation, identification, and determination of antifungal susceptibility ofCandidaspecies causing mycotic mastitis in cattle. A total of260 mastitic milk samples were collected from different farms. Identification was conducted by rapid diagnostic tests and nested PCRmethod; 6 different antifungal agents were examined.Candidasp. was detected in 46 (17.7%) of the 260 mastitic milk samples. Based onAPI 20 C AUX and nested PCR test results, 6 different species ofCandidawere identified.C. tropicaliswas the predominant one (26.1%),followed byC. parasilosis(21.7%),C. kefyrandC. krusei(17.4% each),C. rugosa(13%), andC. glabrata(4.4%). A total of 46 strains wereconfirmed by PCR. According to antifungal test results, the isolates were found to be susceptible to ketoconazole (78.3%) and resistantto flucytosine (91.3%), amphotericin (82.6%), miconazole and nystatin (73.9%), and fluconazole (69.5%).

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜKSEL, H. T., PARIN, U., ERBAŞ, G., SAVAŞAN, S., KIRKAN, Ş., ÖZAVCI, M. V. (2022). Identification of Candida strains with nested PCR in bovine mastitis and determination of antifungal susceptibilities. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 6, 757–763. https://ajindex.com/articles/615055

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Krukowski H, Lisowski A, Rózański P, Skórka A. Yeasts and algae isolated from cows with mastitis in the southeastern part of Poland. Pol J Vet Sci 2006; 9: 181-184
  2. Dworecka-Kaszak B, Krutkiewicz A, Szopa D, Kleczkowski M, Bieganska M. High prevalence of Candida yeast in milk samples from cows suffering from mastitis in Poland. Scientific World Journal 2012; 2012: 196347
  3. Costa EO, Gandra CR, Pires MF, Coutinho SD, Castilho W, Teixeira CM. Survey of bovine mycotic mastitis in dairy herds in the state of Săo Paulo, Brazil. Mycopathologia 1993; 124: 13- 17
  4. Staroniewicz Z, Włodarczak A, Florek M, Król J. Fungal flora in cows with mastitis and its susceptibility to antimycotics. Med Mycol 2007; 14: 257-259
  5. Şeker E, Özenç E. In vitro biofilm activity of Candida species isolated from Anatolian buffaloes with mastitis in Western Turkey. Vet Arh 2011; 81: 723-730
  6. Sartori LCA, Santos RC, Marin JM. Identification of Candida species isolated from cows suffering mastitis in four Brazilian states. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 2014; 66: 1615-1617
  7. Kano R, Hattori Y, Okuzumi K, Miyazaki Y, Yamauchi R, Koie H, Watari T, Hasegawa A. Detection and identification of the Candida species by 25S ribosomal DNA analysis in the urine of candidal cystitis. J Vet Med Sci 2002; 64: 115-117
  8. Dieffenbach CW, Lowe TMJ, Veksler GS. General concepts for PCR primer design. PCR Methods Appl 1993; 3: 30-37
  9. Kanbe T, Horii T, Arishima T, Ozeki M, Kikuchi A. PCR-based identification of pathogenic Candida species using primer mixes specific to Candida DNA topoisomerase II genes. Yeast 2002; 19: 973-989
  10. Kanbe T, Arishima T, Horii T, Kikuchi A. Improvements of PCR-based identification targeting the DNA topoisomerase ii gene to determine major species of the opportunistic fungi Candida and Aspergillus fumigatus. Microbiol Immunol 2003; 47: 631-638
  11. Kato M, Ozeki M, Kikuchi A, Kanbe T. Phylogenetic relationship and mode of evolution of yeast DNA topoisomerase II gene in the pathogenic Candida species. Gene 2001; 272: 275-281
  12. Krukowski H. Mycotic mastitis in cows. Med Weter 2001; 57: 18-20
  13. Quinn PJ, Markey B, Carter ME, Donnelly WJ, Leonard FC. Veterinary Microbiology and Microbial Disease. Ames, IA, USA: Blackwell Publishing Professional; 2002
  14. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Method for Antifungal Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts: Approved Guidelines. Second Edition. CLSI Document M44-A2. Wayne, PA, USA: Clinical Laborat