Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 5

Effects of the addition of essential oils cumimaldehyde, eugenol, and thymol on the in vitro gas production and digestibility of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) silage

Pages
395–401
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, this study showed that the addition of different amounts of cuminaldehyde, eugenol, and thymol to alfalfasilage reduced the amount of in vitro gas production.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to investigate the in vitro effects of the addition of three essential oils, mainly cuminaldehyde,eugenol, and thymol to alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) silage on gas production, digestibility, and metabolic energy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The essential oils wereadded at 0 ppm (controls) and 100 ppm (group 1), 200 ppm (group 2), and 300 ppm (group 3) with three replications.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, this study showed that the addition of different amounts of cuminaldehyde, eugenol, and thymol to alfalfasilage reduced the amount of in vitro gas production.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the in vitro effects of the addition of three essential oils, mainly cuminaldehyde,eugenol, and thymol to alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) silage on gas production, digestibility, and metabolic energy. The essential oils wereadded at 0 ppm (controls) and 100 ppm (group 1), 200 ppm (group 2), and 300 ppm (group 3) with three replications. The cumulativeamount of gas resulting from the addition of the three essential oils at the 96th h of incubation was significantly lower than that of thecontrol group (P < 0.05). The cumulative amount of gas production at the 96th h of incubation with thymol ranged from 184.63 mL/g to217.38 mL/g. In conclusion, this study showed that the addition of different amounts of cuminaldehyde, eugenol, and thymol to alfalfasilage reduced the amount of in vitro gas production. Therefore, these treatments can potentially reduce environmental pollution fromruminal digestion. However, the use of increasing levels of essential oils reduced the amounts of digestible organic matter and metabolicenergy. Additional studies are necessary to reveal the effects of these essential oils on in vivo ruminal fermentation by measuringchanges in feed consumption and productivity

🔖

Cite This Article

SALMAN, M., MURUZ, H., ÇETİNKAYA, N., SELÇUK, Z., KAYA, İ. (2022). Effects of the addition of essential oils cumimaldehyde, eugenol, and thymol on the in vitro gas production and digestibility of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) silage. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 5, 395–401. https://ajindex.com/articles/614987

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ensminger ME, Oldfield JE, Heinemann WW. Feed and Nutrition. 2nd ed. Clovis, CA, USA: Ensminger Publishing Company; 1990
  2. Mathot KJ, Wright J, Kempenaers B, Dingemanse NJ. Adaptive strategies for managing uncertainty may explain personalityrelated differences in behavioural plasticity. Oikos 2012; 121: 1009-1020
  3. Macheboeuf D, Morgavi DP, Papon Y, Mousset JL, ArturoSchaan M. Dose-response effects of essential oils on in vitro fermentation activity of the rumen microbial population. Anim Feed Sci Tech 2008; 145: 335-350
  4. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories; Greenhouse Gas Inventory Reference Manual. IPCC WGI Technical Support Unit, Bracknell, UK; 1996
  5. Johnson KA, Johnson DE. Methane emissions from cattle. J Anim Sci 1995; 73: 2483-2492
  6. Boadi D, Benchaar C, Chiquette J, Masse D. Mitigation strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: update review. Can J Anim Sci 2004; 84: 319-335
  7. Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, De Haan C. Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options. Rome, Italy: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations; 2006
  8. Castillejos L, Calsamiglia S, Ferret A. Effect of essential oils active compounds on rumen microbial fermentation and nutrient flow in in vitro systems. J Dairy Sci 2006; 89: 2649- 2658
  9. Burt S. Essential oils: their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods-a review. Int J Food Microbiol 2004; 94: 223-253
  10. Wallace RJ, McEwan NR, McIntosh FM, Teferedegne B, Newbold CJ. Natural products as manipulators of rumen fermentation. Asian Austral J Anim Sci 2002; 15: 1458-1468
  11. Busquet M, Calsamiglia S, Ferret A, Kamel C. Plant extracts affect in vitro rumen microbial fermentation. J Dairy Sci 2006; 89: 761-771
  12. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis.19th ed. Arlington, VA, USA: AOAC; 2012
  13. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991; 74: 3583
  14. Goering HK, Van Soest PJ. Forage Fiber Analysis (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures and Some Applications). Agricultural Handbook. Washington, DC: ARS-USDA; 1970. 15. Ørskov ER, McDonald I. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurement weighed according to rate of passage. J Agric Sci 1979; 92: 499- 503
  15. Menke KH,