Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2

Certain behavioral characteristics and stress responses of out-of-breeding ewes and rams during an intensive fattening program

Pages
97–102
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, the behavioral repertoire ofHemsin and Karakul breeds in intensive fattening does not reveal any stress responses.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim was to investigate behaviors and stress responses of rams and ewes in an intensive fattening period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Out-of-breedingrams (Hemsin = 10, Karakul = 10) and ewes (Hemsin = 8, Karakul = 10) were used in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, the behavioral repertoire ofHemsin and Karakul breeds in intensive fattening does not reveal any stress responses.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim was to investigate behaviors and stress responses of rams and ewes in an intensive fattening period. Out-of-breedingrams (Hemsin = 10, Karakul = 10) and ewes (Hemsin = 8, Karakul = 10) were used in the study. Sheep and rams belonging to each breedwere placed into four different pens. Behavioral observations (individual, feeding, abnormal self-grooming behaviors) were performed2 days a week for two groups a day for 1 h. Blood samples were collected at the beginning, at the 4th week, and at the end of the fatteningperiod. Karakul ewes displayed significantly more feeding and rumination behavior than Hemsin ewes, while there was no significantdifference between ram groups. Ewes displayed more lying and rumination behavior than rams in the current study. On the other hand,rams were more active than ewes and also showed more abnormal behavior (butting other animals) during the fattening period. Sheepbreed had no influence on packed cell volume (PCV), hemoglobin (Hb) concentration, or cortisol level at any sampling time. PCV,Hb, and cortisol levels at the middle of the fattening period were higher in ewes than rams. In conclusion, the behavioral repertoire ofHemsin and Karakul breeds in intensive fattening does not reveal any stress responses.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, A., KOÇAK, Ö., EKİZ, B., YALÇINTAN, H., EKİZ, E. E., BALA, D. A. (2022). Certain behavioral characteristics and stress responses of out-of-breeding ewes and rams during an intensive fattening program. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2, 97–102. https://ajindex.com/articles/614980

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. FAO. Food and Agriculture Databases. Rome, Italy: FAO; 2016
  2. TÜİK. I., II., III. ve IV. Çeyrek kırmızı et üretim istatistikleri. TÜİK Haber Bülteni. Ankara, Turkey: TÜİK; 2016 (in Turkish)
  3. Ergul Ekiz E, Yalcintan H. Comparison of certain haematological and biochemical parameters regarding preslaughter stress in Saanen, Maltese, Gokceada and hair goat kids. Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Istanbul University 2013; 39: 189-196
  4. Broom DM. The effects of land transport on animal welfare. Rev Sci Tech OIE 2005; 24: 683-691
  5. Karaağaç F, Özcan M, Savaş T. Some behaviour traits observed on the Kıvırcık and crossbred lambs raised in intensive conditions. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2005; 29: 803-809
  6. Sevi A, Casamassima D, Pulina G, Pazzona A. Factors of welfare reduction in dairy sheep and goats. Ital J Anim Sci 2007; 8: 81-101
  7. Bogner H. Verhaltensbeobachtungen, versuchsanlage und auswertungen. In: Bogner H, editor. Verhalten landwirtschaftlicher Nutztiere. Stuttgart, Germany: Verlag Eugen Ulmer; 1984. pp. 61-74
  8. Ekiz B, Ergül Ekiz E, Yalçıntan H, Koçak Ö, Yılmaz A, Güneş H. The effect of transport stress on certain welfare parameters and behaviours in Red Karaman, Imroz, Sakız and Karakul rams. Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Istanbul University 2012; 38: 15-28
  9. Kent JE. Stress in transported sheep. Comp Haematol Int 1997; 7: 163-166
  10. Hall SJG, Bradshaw RH. Welfare aspects of the transport by road of sheep and pigs. J App Anim Wel Science 1998; 1: 235- 254
  11. Jones ML, Allison RW. Evaluation of the ruminant complete blood cell count. Vet Clin Food Anim 2007; 23: 377-402
  12. Nowak R, Porter RH, Blache D, Dwyer CM. Behaviour and the welfare of the sheep. In: Dwyer C, editor. The Welfare of Sheep. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2008. pp. 81-134
  13. Schirmann K, Chapinal N, Weary DM, 12. Nowak R, Porter RH, Blache D, Dwyer CM. Behaviour and the welfare of the sheep. In: Dwyer C, editor. The Welfare of Sheep. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2008. pp. 81-134
  14. Schirmann K, Chapinal N, Weary DM, Heuwieser W, von Keyserlingk MAG. Rumination and its relationship to feeding and lying behavior in Holstein dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2012; 95: 3212-3217
  15. Grant RJ, Albright JL. Feeding behaviour. In: D’Mello JPF, editor. Farm Animal Metabolism and Nutrition. Wallingford, UK: CABI; 2006. pp. 365-382
  16. EEC. Council Directive 98/58/EC of 20 July 1998 Concerning the Protection of Animals Kept for Farming Purposes; OJ L 221, 8.