Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 5

Complications of ultrasound-guided cystocentesis in companion animals: 21 cases (2005–2016)

Pages
459–466
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings of this study can be useful to promptly identify complications after UGDC and to ensure a propertreatment and follow-up.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Complications of cystocentesis in dogs and cats are seldom reported.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Twenty-one cases met the inclusion criteria (20 animals).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings of this study can be useful to promptly identify complications after UGDC and to ensure a propertreatment and follow-up.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Complications of cystocentesis in dogs and cats are seldom reported. The aim of this study was to describe clinical andultrasonographic features of complications after diagnostic cystocentesis. Medical records of animals that underwent ultrasound-guideddiagnostic cystocentesis (UGDC) were retrospectively reviewed to describe adverse events. The inclusion criteria were: ultrasoundreport describing the complication, signalment, clinical history, urine culture, and surgical exploration or necroscopic findings if present.Images of ultrasonographic examination were reviewed. Complications were classified as minor and major. Minor complications weredefined as self-limited events; major complications were those that led to prolonged hospitalization and required intensive therapy orsurgery, or lead to death. Twenty-one cases met the inclusion criteria (20 animals). Major complications included septic peritonitis (n= 2), big vessel laceration (n = 2), and acute abdomen (n = 1). Death occurred in two cases (septic peritonitis). Minor complicationsincluded nodular fat necrosis (n = 1), abdominal wall abscess formation (n = 1), intraluminal blood clots (n = 2), self-limited bleeding(n = 5), wall bladder hematoma (n = 3), bladder mucosal detachment (n = 1), intraparietal gas bubbles (n = 2), and focal peritonitisadjacent to bladder (n = 1). Findings of this study can be useful to promptly identify complications after UGDC and to ensure a propertreatment and follow-up.

🔖

Cite This Article

MANFREDI, S., CARVAHLO, C., FONTI, P., GNUDI, G., MIDURI, F., FABBI, M., DAGA, E., RAVERA, M., MORABITO, S., AURIEMMA, E., PARROCCINI, I., BONAZZI, M., VOLTA, A. (2022). Complications of ultrasound-guided cystocentesis in companion animals: 21 cases (2005–2016). Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 5, 459–466. https://ajindex.com/articles/614944

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Kruger JM, Osborne CA, Ulrich LK. Cystocentesis. Diagnostic and therapeutic considerations. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Prac 1996; 26: 353-361
  2. Vap LM, Shropshire SB. Urine cytology collection, film preparation, and evaluation. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Prac 2017; 47: 135-149
  3. Odunayo A, Ng ZJ, Holford AL. Probable vasovagal reaction following cystocentesis in two cats. J Feline Med Surg Open Reports 2015; 22: 1-4
  4. Specht A, Chan D, O’Toole T, Kent M, Benson J, Rozanski EA, Rusj JE. Acute staphylococcal peritonitis following cystocentesis in a dog. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2002; 12: 183-187
  5. Hall J, Hall K, Powell LL, Lulich J. Outcome of male cats managed for urethral obstruction with decompressive cystocentesis and urinary catheterization: 47 cats (2009-2012). J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2015; 25: 256-262
  6. Sørensen TM, Jensen AB, Damborg P, Bjørnvad CR, Guardabassi L, Jessen LR. Evaluation of different sampling methods and criteria for diagnosing canine urinary tract infection by quantitative bacterial culture. Vet J 2016; 216: 168- 173
  7. Davis H, Riel Dl, Pappagianis M, Miguel K. Diagnostic sampling and therapeutic techniques. In: Basset JM, Thomas JA, editors. Clinical Textbook for Veterinary Technicians. 8th ed. London, UK: Saunders; 2013. p. 605
  8. Buckley GJ, Aktay SA, Rozanski EA. Massive transfusion and surgical management of iatrogenic aortic laceration associated with cystocentesis in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2009; 235: 288-291
  9. Schwarz T, Morandi F, Gnudi G, Wisner E, Paterson C, Sullivan M, Johston P. Nodular fat necrosis in feline and canine abdomen. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2000; 41: 335-339
  10. Withrow SJ, Vail DM. The biology and pathogenesis of cancer. In: Withrow SJ, Vail DM, editors. Small Animal Oncology. 4th ed. St. Louis, MO, USA: Saunders; 2007. p. 14
  11. Moustaki M, Stefos E, Malliou C, Fretzayas A. Complications of suprapubic aspiration in transiently neutropenic children. Pediatr Emerg Care 2007; 23: 823-825
  12. Datz CA. Noninfectious causes of immunosuppression in dogs and cats. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Prac 2010; 40: 459-467
  13. Sutherland-Smith J, Penninck D. Bladder and urethra. In: Penninck D, D’Anjou MA, editors. Atlas of Small Animal Ultrasonography. 2nd ed. Ames, IA, USA: Wiley Blackwell; 2015. pp. 378-383
  14. O’Brien RT, Wood EF. Urinary bladder mural hemorrhage associated with systemic bleeding disorders in three dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1998; 39: 354-356
  15. Le Boedec L, Pastor ML, Lavouè