Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2

Survey of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs from Sivas Province in the Central Anatolia Region of Turkey

Pages
130–134
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This research provides thefirst data on D. immitis infections in dogs from Sivas Province by using the combined identification techniques.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this research, we investigate the prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis infection in dogs using microscopical, serological, andmolecular methods from the Central Anatolia Region (Sivas) of Turkey and reveal the associated risk factors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Whole blood and serumsamples were obtained from 306 dogs older than 7 months.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This research provides thefirst data on D. immitis infections in dogs from Sivas Province by using the combined identification techniques.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this research, we investigate the prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis infection in dogs using microscopical, serological, andmolecular methods from the Central Anatolia Region (Sivas) of Turkey and reveal the associated risk factors. Whole blood and serumsamples were obtained from 306 dogs older than 7 months. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and the modified Knott’s method (Knott)were used for detecting the microfilaria and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was applied for the presence of D. immitisantigens. The prevalence of D. immitis in dogs was detected as 2.9% (9/306) by PCR and ELISA and as 1.3% (4/306) by Knott. All Knottpositive samples were also found positive by both PCR and ELISA. According to ELISA and PCR results, no statistically significantdifference was found between the prevalence in males (4.2%) and females (1.5%); dogs 0.7–2 years old (2.5%), 3–5 years old (2.2%); andmore than 6 years old (7.1%); or stray (3.7%) and owned (1.7%) dogs (P > 0.05). One of the PCR products was selected for sequenceanalyses of the 16S small subunit rRNA gene and the obtained sequence was submitted to GenBank (KJ183078). The 16S rRNA sequenceexhibited 100% identity to other D. immitis sequences available in GenBank (FJ799911, FJ799917, FJ799916). This research provides thefirst data on D. immitis infections in dogs from Sivas Province by using the combined identification techniques.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKAN, E., ALİM, A., ALTAY, K., ATAŞ, A. D. (2022). Survey of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs from Sivas Province in the Central Anatolia Region of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2, 130–134. https://ajindex.com/articles/614922

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Genchi C, Mortarino M, Rinaldi L, Cringoli G, Traldi G, Genchi M. Changing climate and changing vector-borne disease distribution: the example of Dirofilaria in Europe. Vet Parasitol 2011; 176: 295-299
  2. Furtado AP, Melo FTV, Giese EG, dos Santos JN. Morphological redescription of Dirofilaria immitis. J Parasitol 2010; 96: 499- 504
  3. Yaman M, Guzel M, Koltas IS, Demirkazik M, Aktas H. Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs from Hatay province, Turkey. J Helminthol 2009; 83: 255-260
  4. Furtado AP, Do Carmo ES, Giese EG, Vallinoto ACR, Lanfredi RM, dos Santos JN. Detection of dog filariasis in Marajo Island, Brazil by classical and molecular methods. Parasitol Res 2009; 105: 1509-1515
  5. Simsek S, Ozkanlar YE, Balkaya I, Aktas MS. Microscopic, serologic and molecular surveys on Dirofilaria immitis in stray dogs, Turkey. Vet Parasitol 2011; 183: 109-113
  6. Rishniw M, Barr SC, Simpson KW, Frongillo MF, Franz M, Dominguez-Alpizar JL. Discrimination between six species of canine microfilariae by a single polymerase chain reaction. Vet Parasitol 2006; 135: 303-314
  7. Öncel T, Vural G. Seroprevalence of Dirofilaria immitis in stray dogs in İstanbul and İzmir. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2005; 29: 785- 789
  8. Ağaoğlu Z, Akgül Y, Ceylan E, Akkan H. The incidence of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs in Van Province. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 2000; 11: 41-43 (in Turkish with abstract in English)
  9. Simsek S, Utuk AE, Koroglu E, Rishniw M. Serological and molecular studies on Dirofilaria immitis in dogs from Turkey. J Helminthol 2008; 82: 181-186
  10. Yildirim A, Ica A, Atalay O, Duzlu O, Inci A. Prevalence and epidemiological aspects of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs from Kayseri Province, Turkey. Res Vet Sci 2007; 82: 358-363
  11. Ataş AD, Özçelik S, Saygı G. The occurence of helminth species in stray dogs, their prevalence and significance of public health in Sivas. Türkiye Parazitoloji Dergisi 1997; 21: 305-309 (in Turkish with abstract in English)
  12. Pantchev N, Etzold M, Daugschies A, Dyachenko V. Diagnosis of imported canine filarial infections in Germany 2008–2010. Parasitol Res 2011; 109: 61-76
  13. Vezzani D, Mesplet M, Eiras DF, María F, Fontanarrosa MF, Schnittger L. PCR detection of Dirofilaria immitis in Aedes aegypti and Culex pipiens from urban temperate Argentina. Parasitol Res 2011; 108: 985-989
  14. Song KH, Park JE, Lee DH, Lee SH, Shin HJ. Serological update and molecular characterization of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs,