Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1

Assessment of low doses of Eimeria tenella sporulated oocysts on the biochemical parameters and intestinal microflora of chickens

Pages
76–81
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Statistical differences were not observedwhen average weight gains between the infected and noninfected groups were compared.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to evaluate the biochemical parameters and intestinal microflora in broilers with low doses ofEimeria tenella.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Birds from the experimental groups were orally infected with 500 (GI) or 1000 (GII) sporulated oocysts of E. tenellaand then examined for weight gain, biochemical indicators, and microbiota on day 9 and 16 after infection.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Statistical differences were not observedwhen average weight gains between the infected and noninfected groups were compared.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study was carried out to evaluate the biochemical parameters and intestinal microflora in broilers with low doses ofEimeria tenella. Birds from the experimental groups were orally infected with 500 (GI) or 1000 (GII) sporulated oocysts of E. tenellaand then examined for weight gain, biochemical indicators, and microbiota on day 9 and 16 after infection. Experimental infection ofE. tenella on day 9 post infection (pi) increased concentrations of uric acid, cholesterol, triacylglycerols, and glucose; however, thesemeasurements did not differ from those of the control group on day 16 pi. On day 16 pi, bifidobacteria counts were lower in bothinfected groups, whereas E. coli counts were higher in GII than in GI and the control group. Statistical differences were not observedwhen average weight gains between the infected and noninfected groups were compared.

🔖

Cite This Article

CADKOVA, Z., JANKOVSKA, I., NECHYBOVA, S., HORAKOVA, B., LANGROVA, I., CHODOVA, D., KREJCIROVA, R., SASKOVA, M., TUMOVA, E., VADLEJCH, J., SVEJSTIL, R., KNIZKOVA, I. (2022). Assessment of low doses of Eimeria tenella sporulated oocysts on the biochemical parameters and intestinal microflora of chickens. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1, 76–81. https://ajindex.com/articles/614898

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Williams RB. A compartmentalised model for the estimation of the cost of coccidiosis to the world’s chicken production industry. Int J Parasitol 1999; 29: 1209-1229
  2. Allen P. Nitric oxide production during Eimeria tenella infections in chickens. Poultry Sci 1997; 76: 810-813
  3. Zulpo DL, Peretti J, Ono LM, Longhni E, Oliveira MR, Guimarães IG, Headley SA, da Silva Guimarães J Jr, Garcia JL. Pathogenicity and histopathological observations of commercial broiler chicks experimentally infected with isolates of Eimeria tenella, E. acervulina and E. maxima. Ciênc Agrár 2007; 28: 97-104
  4. Conway DP, McKenzie ME. Poultry Coccidiosis: Diagnostic and Testing Procedures. 3rd ed. Ames, IA, USA: Blackwell Publishing; 2007
  5. Sarı B, Çakmak A. Preventive effects of anticoccidial drug supplementation in chicken feed against coccidiosis in broiler farming. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal 2008; 1: 1-10 (in Turkish with abstract in English)
  6. Haug A, Gjevre AG, Skjerve E, Kaldhusdal M. A survey of the economic impact of subclinical Eimeria infections in broiler chickens in Norway. Avian Pathol 2008; 37: 333-341
  7. Marshall RN, Taylor MA, Green JA, Catchpole J. The pathogenic effects of a UK field isolate of Eimeria tenella in modern broiler and layer chickens. J Protozool Res 1995; 5: 66-76
  8. Long CW, Henderson LE, Oroszlan S. Isolation and characterization of low-molecular-weight DNA-binding proteins from retroviruses. Virology 1980; 104: 491-496
  9. Jatau ID, Muhammad ST, Umaru-Sule B, Yusuf KH, Owolabi YH. Comparative infectivity and pathogenicity of Kano and Sokoto (Northern Nigeria) isolates of Trypanosoma evansi in rabbits. B Anim Health Prod Africa 2013; 61: 7-15
  10. Witlock DR, Ruff MD, Chute MB. Physiological basis of Eimeria tenella-induced mortality in individual chickens. J Parasitol 1981; 67: 65-69
  11. Conway DP, Sasai K, Gaafar SM, Smothers CD. Effects of different levels of oocyst inocula of Eimeria acervulina, E. tenella and E. maxima on plasma constituents, packed cell volume, lesion scores, and performance in chickens. Avian Dis 1993; 37: 118-123
  12. Fukata T, Komba Y, Sasai K, Baba E, Arakawa A. Evaluation of plasma chemistry and haematological studies on chickens infected with Eimeria tenella and E. acervulina. Vet Rec 1997; 141: 44-46
  13. Giannenas I, Papadopoulos E, Tsalie E, Triantafillou E, Henikl S, Teichmann K, Tontis D. Assessment of dietary supplementation with probiotics on performance, intestinal morphology and microflora of chi