Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 4

Serodiagnostic potential of Brucella outer membrane and periplasmic proteins

Pages
486–493
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, the development of reliable ELISA tests for the diagnosisof brucellosis requires further comprehensive study of the recombinant proteins in order to design a multiprotein antigen that consistsof a combination of several proteins with diagnostic potential.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to evaluate the serological diagnostic potential of the Brucella recombinant outer membrane(rOMP25, rOMP31) and periplasmic proteins (rBP26, rSOD) in a comparative way using an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbentassay (i-ELISA).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thus, the presence ofanti-Brucella antibodies was confirmed by i-ELISA/rSOD in 79% of cows from endemic conditions with positive results by conventionalserological tests (RBPT and/or CFT).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, the development of reliable ELISA tests for the diagnosisof brucellosis requires further comprehensive study of the recombinant proteins in order to design a multiprotein antigen that consistsof a combination of several proteins with diagnostic potential.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the serological diagnostic potential of the Brucella recombinant outer membrane(rOMP25, rOMP31) and periplasmic proteins (rBP26, rSOD) in a comparative way using an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbentassay (i-ELISA). Rabbit and/or mouse antibodies to Brucella whole cell and/or soluble protein preparations recognized all recombinantproteins used, which confirms the expression of target antigens in E. coli in active form. The recombinant proteins showed differentantigenicity to antibodies of cattle kept on a brucellosis-affected (endemic) farm and/or a new focus of infection. Thus, the presence ofanti-Brucella antibodies was confirmed by i-ELISA/rSOD in 79% of cows from endemic conditions with positive results by conventionalserological tests (RBPT and/or CFT). However, antibodies specific to this protein were detected in only 14% of seropositive animals keptin the hotbed of a new brucellosis infection. Moreover, rSOD-specific antibodies were not detected in the sera of vaccinated cattle froma brucellosis-free farm, whereas antibodies to other recombinant proteins were found in 2%–8% of animals. Using recombinant proteinsin immunoassays significantly reduced the number of cows positive for brucellosis. Furthermore, there was not a single protein amongthe rOMPs that would show the total positive results of all proteins used. Thus, the development of reliable ELISA tests for the diagnosisof brucellosis requires further comprehensive study of the recombinant proteins in order to design a multiprotein antigen that consistsof a combination of several proteins with diagnostic potential.

🔖

Cite This Article

SURANSHIYEV, Z., AKIBEKOV, O., INGIRBAY, B., ESKENDIROVA, S., BULASHEV, A. (2022). Serodiagnostic potential of Brucella outer membrane and periplasmic proteins. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 4, 486–493. https://ajindex.com/articles/614895

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Franc K, Krecek R, Häsler B, Arenas-Gamboa A. Brucellosis remains a neglected disease in the developing world: a call for interdisciplinary action. BioMed Central Public Health 2018
  2. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-5016-y 2. Pappas G, Papadimitriou P, Akritidis N, Christou L, Tsianos EV. The new global map of human brucellosis. Lancet Infectious Diseases 2006
  3. 6 (2): 91-99. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70382-6 3. Al Dahouk S, Tomaso H, Nockler K, Neubauer H, Frangoulidis D. Laboratory-based diagnosis of brucellosis–a review of the literature. Part II: Serological tests for brucellosis. Clinical Laboratory 2003
  4. Mandal SS, Duncombe L, Ganesh NV, Sarkar S, Howells L et al. Novel solutions for vaccines and diagnostics to combat brucellosis. ACS Central Science 2017
  5. 3 (3): 224-231. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.7b00019 5. Erdenebaatar J, Bayarsaikhan B, Watarai M, Makino S, Shirahata T. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to differentiate the antibody responses of animals infected with Brucella species from those of animals infected with Yersinia enterocolitica O:9. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology 2003
  6. 10 (4): 710-714. 6. Bonfini B, Chiarenza G, Paci V, Sacchini F, Salini R et al. Crossreactivity in serological tests for brucellosis: a comparison of immune response of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 vs Brucella spp. Veterinaria Italiana 2018
  7. 54 (2): 107-114. doi: 10.12834/VetIt.1176.6539.2 7. Corbel M, Stuart F, Brewer R. Observations on serological cross-reactions between smooth Brucella species and organisms of other genera. Developments in Biological Standardization 1984
  8. Ko K, Kim J, Her M, Kang S, Jung S et al. Immunogenic proteins of Brucella abortus to minimize cross reactions in brucellosis diagnosis. Veterinary Microbiology 2012
  9. 156 (3-4): 374-380. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.11.011 9. Sowa B, Kelly K, Ficht T, Frey M, Adams L. SDS-soluble and peptidoglycan-bound proteins in the outer membranepeptidoglycan complex of Brucella abortus. Veterinary Microbiology 1991
  10. 27 (3-4): 351-369. 10. Cloeckaert A, Vizcaíno N, Paquet J, Bowden R, Elzer P. Major outer membrane proteins of Brucella spp.: past, present and future. Veterinary Microbiology 2002
  11. 90 (1-4): 229-247. 11. Navarro-Soto M, Morales-Loredo A, Álvarez-Ojeda G, Ramírez-Pfeiffer C, Tamez-Guerra P et al. Recombinant proteins as antigens in serological diagnosis of brucellosis. In: Baddour MM (editor). Updates on Brucellosis. Rijeka,