Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 5

Phenotypic and genotypic investigation of the heavy metal resistance in Escherichia coli isolates recovered from cattle stool samples

Pages
684–691
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Using the correct fertilizer to minimize contamination sources or limitingthe use of materials that contain metals may be useful, and new legal rules may be required.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to examine resistance against cadmium (Cd+2), copper (Cu+2), lead (Pb+2), mercury (Hg+2), andmanganese (Mn+2) in Escherichia coli isolates recovered from cattle stool using phenotypic (agar dilution) and genotypic [polymerasechain reaction (PCR)] methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Escherichia coli was isolated and identified from the 100 stool samples that were examined in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Using the correct fertilizer to minimize contamination sources or limitingthe use of materials that contain metals may be useful, and new legal rules may be required.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine resistance against cadmium (Cd+2), copper (Cu+2), lead (Pb+2), mercury (Hg+2), andmanganese (Mn+2) in Escherichia coli isolates recovered from cattle stool using phenotypic (agar dilution) and genotypic [polymerasechain reaction (PCR)] methods. In addition, the isolates were genotyped via enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus polymerasechain reaction (ERIC-PCR). Escherichia coli was isolated and identified from the 100 stool samples that were examined in the study. Itwas determined phenotypically that all isolates were sensitive to mercury; 97% of them showed resistance to cadmium; 69% showedresistance to copper; 24% showed resistance to lead; and 20% showed resistance to manganese. In the isolates found resistant by phenotypicmethod, the presence of the zntA gene provided common resistance for Cd+2 and Pb+2; pcoR gene provided resistance for Cu+2; andmntR gene for Mn+2 in both genomic DNA and plasmid DNA. Since all isolates were sensitive to Hg+2, the presence of merA gene wasnot examined. While the target genes that were examined for lead, cadmium, and manganese were detected in all isolates, the pcoR genefor copper was detected in 53.6% of the phenotypic-resistant isolates. As a result of the statistical analysis, it was determined that thephenotypic resistance rates of the isolates did not vary according to age group, county, or city at a significant level (P > 0.05). The highmetal resistance detected in the present study led us to conclude that heavy metal contamination around cattle farms may be common.Metals are used as an additive substance in animal husbandry. Using the correct fertilizer to minimize contamination sources or limitingthe use of materials that contain metals may be useful, and new legal rules may be required.

🔖

Cite This Article

SİPAHİ, N., KARAKAYA, E., İKİZ, S. (2022). Phenotypic and genotypic investigation of the heavy metal resistance in Escherichia coli isolates recovered from cattle stool samples. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 5, 684–691. https://ajindex.com/articles/614881

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Nies D. Efflux-mediated heavy metal resistance in prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 2003; 27: 313-339
  2. Spain A, Alm E. Implications of microbial heavy metal tolerance in the environment. Undergraduate Research 2003; 2: 1-6
  3. Martins VV, Zanetti MOB, Pitondo-Silva A, Stehling EG. Aquatic environments polluted with antibiotics and heavy metals: a human health hazard. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2014; 21: 5873-5878
  4. Seiler C, Berendonk TU. Heavy metal driven co-selection of antibiotic resistance in soil and water bodies impacted by agriculture and aquaculture. Frontiers in Microbiology 2012; 3: 399
  5. Dell’Amico E, Mazzocchi M, Cavalca L, Allievi L, Andreoni V. Assessment of bacterial community structure in a long-term copper polluted ex-vineyard soil. Microbiological Reserch 2006; 163: 671-683
  6. Waters LS, Sandoval M, Storz G. The Escherichia coli MntR miniregulon includes genes encoding a small protein and an efflux pump required for manganese homeostasis. Journal of Bacteriology 2011; 193, 5887-5897
  7. Yazdankhah S, Rudi K, Bernhoft A. Zinc and copper in animal feed—development of resistance and co-resistance to antimicrobial agents in bacteria of animal origin. Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease 2014; 25: 25862
  8. Hao X, Lüthe FL, Qin Y, McDevitt SF, Lutay N et al. Survival in amoeba—a major selection pressure on the presence of bacterial copper and zinc resistance determinants? Identification of a copper pathogenicity island. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2015; 99: 5817-5824
  9. Abou-Shanab RAI, Berkum VP, Angle JS. Heavy metal resistance and genotypic analysis of metal resistance genes in gram positive and gram negative bacteria present in Ni-rich serpentine soil and in the rhizosphere of Alyssum murale. Chemosphere 2007; 68: 360-367
  10. Hölzel CS, Müller C, Harms KS, Mikolajewski S, Schafer S, Schwaiger S, Bauer J. Heavy metals in liquid pig manure in light of bacterial antimicrobial resistance. Environmental Research 2012; 113: 21-27
  11. Chihomvu P, Stegmann P, Pillay M. Characterization and structure prediction of partial length protein sequences pcoA, pcoR and chrB, genes from heavy metal resistant bacteria from the Klip River, South Africa. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2015; 16: 7352-7374
  12. Staehlin BM, Gibbons JG, Rokas A, O’Halloran TV, Slot JC. Evolution of a heavy metal homeostasis/resistance island reflects increasing copper stress in Enterobacteria. Genome Biology and Evo