SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1

Phylogenetic relationships of native Turkish cattle breeds using microsatellite markers

Ayşe IŞIK
Aysun ÇAMLIDAĞ
Yusuf ÖZŞENSOY
Mehmet NİZAMLIOĞLU
Vahdettin ALTUNOK
Zafer BULUT
Müge DOĞAN
Ercan KURAR
Pages
23–29
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The observedgenetic diversities and the results of the phylogenetic analyses were in agreement with evolutionary history and the geographical originsof Turkish native cattle breeds.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A total of 20 microsatellite DNA markers were used for genetic characterization and determination of phylogeneticrelationships of native cattle breeds of Turkey, including the Anatolian Grey (AG), Anatolian Black (AB), South Anatolian Red (SAR),East Anatolian Red (EAR), Southern Anatolian Yellow (SAY), and Zavot (ZAV).
📊
Key Findings & Data:DNA samples were isolated from 271 blood samplesusing an organic method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The observedgenetic diversities and the results of the phylogenetic analyses were in agreement with evolutionary history and the geographical originsof Turkish native cattle breeds.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

A total of 20 microsatellite DNA markers were used for genetic characterization and determination of phylogeneticrelationships of native cattle breeds of Turkey, including the Anatolian Grey (AG), Anatolian Black (AB), South Anatolian Red (SAR),East Anatolian Red (EAR), Southern Anatolian Yellow (SAY), and Zavot (ZAV). DNA samples were isolated from 271 blood samplesusing an organic method. Amplified polymerase chain reaction products were separated by capillary electrophoresis and genotypeswere determined for 20 microsatellites. A total of 269 different alleles were determined. The lowest (7.80) and highest (10.80) meanallele numbers were observed for the ZAV and SAY populations, respectively. TGLA122 was the most polymorphic locus; however,only 7 different alleles were observed for INRA005. A total of 40 different private alleles were determined. The general FIS values werebetween 0.034 and 0.123. Due to the close location to the domestication center, higher genetic diversities were observed. The observedgenetic diversities and the results of the phylogenetic analyses were in agreement with evolutionary history and the geographical originsof Turkish native cattle breeds.

🔖

Cite This Article

IŞIK, A., ÇAMLIDAĞ, A., ÖZŞENSOY, Y., NİZAMLIOĞLU, M., ALTUNOK, V., BULUT, Z., DOĞAN, M., KURAR, E. (2022). Phylogenetic relationships of native Turkish cattle breeds using microsatellite markers. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1, 23–29. https://ajindex.com/articles/614861

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Bruford MW, Bradley DG, Luikart G. DNA markers reveal the complexity of livestock domestication. Nat Rev Genet 2003; 4: 900-910
  2. Loftus RT, Ertuğrul O, Harba MH, El-Barody AA, MacHugh DE, Park SDE, Bradly DG. A microsatellite survey of cattle from a centre of origin: the Near East. Mol Ecol 1999; 8: 2015- 2022
  3. Luikart G, Gielly L, Excoffier L, Vigne JD, Bouvet J, Taberlet P. Multiple maternal origins and weak phylogeographic structure in domestic goats. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 5927-5932
  4. Troy CS, MacHugh DE, Bailey JF, Magee DA, Loftus RT, Cunningham P, Chamberlain AT, Sykes BC, Bradley DG. Genetic evidence for Near-Eastern origins of European cattle. Nature 2001; 410: 1088-1091
  5. Hiendleder S, Kaupe B, Wassmuth R, Janke A. Molecular analysis of wild and domestic sheep questions current nomenclature and provides evidence for domestication from two different subspecies. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 2002; 269: 893- 904
  6. Cymbron T, Freeman AR, Isabel Malheiro M, Vigne JD, Bradley DG. Microsatellite diversity suggests different histories for Mediterranean and Northern European cattle populations. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 2005; 272: 1837-1843
  7. Negrini R, Nijman IJ, Milanesi E, Moazami-Goudarzi K, Williams JL, Erhardt G, Dunner S, Rodellar C, Valentini A, Bradley DG et al. European Cattle Genetic Diversity Consortium. Differentiation of European cattle by AFLP fingerprinting. Anim Genet 2007; 38: 60-66
  8. Felius M, Theunissen B, Lenstra JA. Conservation of cattle genetic resources: the role of breeds. J Agr Sci 2014; 153: 152-162
  9. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989
  10. Hoffmann I, Marsan PA, Barker JSF, Cothran EG, Hanotte O, Lenstra JA, Milan D, Weigend S, Simianer H. New MoDAD marker sets to be used in diversity studies for the major farm animal species: recommendations of a joint ISAG/FAO working group. In: Proceedings of the 29th International Society of Animal Genetics Congress. Tokyo, Japan: ISAG; 2004
  11. Özşensoy Y, Kurar E, Doğan M, Bulut Z, Nizamlıoğlu M, Işık A, Çamlıdağ A, Altunok V. Genetic characterization of Turkish cattle breeds by microsatellite markers: usefulness for parentage testing. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak 2014; 20: 521-526
  12. Peakall R, Smouse PE. GENALEX 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol 2006; 6: 288-295
  13. Nei M. Genetic distance between po