Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 3

Isolation and molecular characterization of Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli from poultry samples

Pages
408–422
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

All in all, this study might enlighten somemolecular features of Salmonella and E. coli isolated from chicken products in Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Innumerable foodborne pathogens including Salmonella and Escherichia coli pose a serious threat to human health andfood safety.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Samples belonging to different commercial brands were collected in Ankara in 2015.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:All in all, this study might enlighten somemolecular features of Salmonella and E. coli isolated from chicken products in Turkey.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 · 40 samples
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Innumerable foodborne pathogens including Salmonella and Escherichia coli pose a serious threat to human health andfood safety. As perishable foods, poultry products are considered one of the most common sources of foodborne pathogens includingSalmonella and E. coli due to transmission of drug resistance, dissemination of organisms, and cross-contamination. In our study,phenotypic and genotypic characterizations of Salmonella enterica and E. coli isolated from packaged raw chicken products were carriedout. Samples belonging to different commercial brands were collected in Ankara in 2015. Among 15 out of 19 Salmonella enterica subsp.enterica strains isolated from different and/or same poultry samples were found as Infantis serotype, while 4 of them were identified asEnteritidis serotype by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) footprints. In addition, 19 out of 40 samples gave positive results for E.coli. In addition, PFGE types of Salmonella Infantis isolates were detected as PT 08, 45, and 50. Furthermore, multilocus sequence typingtypes of the samples were identified as ST 32. Results of the phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial resistance profiles of SalmonellaInfantis and E. coli isolates revealed considerable resistance to nalidixic acid, tetracycline, streptomycin, sulfisoxazole and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. On the other hand, 3 E. coli isolates showed antibiotic susceptibility. All in all, this study might enlighten somemolecular features of Salmonella and E. coli isolated from chicken products in Turkey.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULUTAŞ, S. Ö., CESUR, A., SOYER, Y. (2022). Isolation and molecular characterization of Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli from poultry samples. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 3, 408–422. https://ajindex.com/articles/614857

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Thorns CJ. Bacterial food-borne zoonoses. Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizootics) 2000; 19 (1): 226-239
  2. Zaidi MB, Campos FD, Estrada-García T, Gutierrez F, León M et al. Burden and transmission of zoonotic foodborne disease in a rural community in Mexico. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2012; 55 (1): 51-60. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis300 3. Basler C, Nguyen TA, Anderson TC, Hancock T, Behravesh CB. Outbreaks of human Salmonella infections associated with live poultry, United States, 1990-2014. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2016; 22 (10): 1705-1711. doi: 10.3201/ eid2210.150765 4. Dho-Moulin M, Fairbrother JM. Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC). Veterinary Research 1999; 30: 299-316
  3. European Food Safety Authority. Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) O104:H4 2011 outbreaks in Europe: Taking Stock. EFSA Journal 2011; 9 (10): 2390
  4. Santos RL, Zhang S, Tsolis RM, Kingsley RA, Adams GL et al. Animal models of Salmonella infections: Enteritis versus typhoid fever. Microbes and Infection 2001; 3 (14-15): 1335- 1344. doi: 10.1016/S1286-4579(01)01495-2 7. European Food Safety Authority. The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2015. EFSA Journal 2016; 14 (12): 231. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4634 8. USDA-FSIS (2017). Serotypes profile of Salmonella isolates from meat and poultry products January 1998 through December 2014 [online]. Website https://www.fsis.usda.gov/ wps/wcm/connect/3866026a-582d-4f0e-a8ce-851b39c7390f/ Salmonella-Serotype-Annual-2014.pdf?MOD=AJPERES. [accessed 19 March 2019]
  5. European Food Safety Authority, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. The European Union Summary Report on antimicrobial resistance in Antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in the European Union in 2015. EFSA Journal 2017; 15 (2): 4694
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.National Enteric Disease Surveillance: Salmonella Annual Report, 2016. Georgia, GA, USA: National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases; 2018
  7. Gal-Mor O, Valinsky L, Weinberger M, Guy S, Jaffe J et al. Multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis, Israel. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2010; 16 (11): 1754- 1757. doi: 10.3201/eid1611.100100 12. Barco L, Barrucci F, Olsen JE, Ricci A. Salmonella source attribution based on microbial subtyping. International Journal of Food Microbiology 2013; 163 (2