Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of the in vivo efficacy of pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) seeds against gastrointestinal helminths of chickens

Pages
206–211
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicate that comparedto mebendazole, pumpkin seed was moderately effective in reducing worm counts of Ascaridia spp. and Raillietina spp., marginallyactive in reducing worm counts of Heterakis spp., and moderately effective in reducing egg output of the worms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study was conducted to evaluate the in vivo efficacy of pumpkin seeds as an alternative natural anthelmintic forchickens.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ninety Philippine Jolo native chickens of mixed sexes, aged 4–5 months and weighing 1–2 kg, were randomly distributed intothree treatment groups with 30 chickens per group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicate that comparedto mebendazole, pumpkin seed was moderately effective in reducing worm counts of Ascaridia spp. and Raillietina spp., marginallyactive in reducing worm counts of Heterakis spp., and moderately effective in reducing egg output of the worms.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The present study was conducted to evaluate the in vivo efficacy of pumpkin seeds as an alternative natural anthelmintic forchickens. Ninety Philippine Jolo native chickens of mixed sexes, aged 4–5 months and weighing 1–2 kg, were randomly distributed intothree treatment groups with 30 chickens per group. Control group A was fed basic mash feed, group B received feed mixed with groundpumpkin seeds (2 g/bird per day), and group C received mebendazole-medicated feed (30 mg/kg body weight). Fifteen randomlyselected chickens from each group were euthanized and necropsied before treatment, and the remaining fifteen in each group wereeuthanized and necropsied at 3 days after the end of the treatment. Gastrointestinal worm and fecal egg counts were determined. Threegenera of helminths were identified from necropsy: Ascaridia spp., Heterakis spp., and Raillietina spp. Results indicate that comparedto mebendazole, pumpkin seed was moderately effective in reducing worm counts of Ascaridia spp. and Raillietina spp., marginallyactive in reducing worm counts of Heterakis spp., and moderately effective in reducing egg output of the worms. The results suggest thatpumpkin seed has the potential to be used as an alternative anthelmintic for chickens

🔖

Cite This Article

ACORDA, J. A., MANGUBAT, I. Y. E. C., DIVINA, B. P. (2022). Evaluation of the in vivo efficacy of pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) seeds against gastrointestinal helminths of chickens. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 2, 206–211. https://ajindex.com/articles/614852

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Squires S, Fisher M, Gladstone O, Rogerson S, Martin P, Martin S, Lester H, Sygall R, Underwood N. Comparative efficacy of flubendazole and a commercially available herbal wormer against natural infections of Ascaridia galli, Heterakis gallinarum and intestinal Capillaria spp. in chickens. Vet Parasitol 2012; 185: 352-354
  2. Matthews KK, O’Brien DJ, Whitley NC, Burke JM, Miller JE, Barczewski RA. Investigation of possible pumpkin seeds and ginger effects on gastrointestinal nematode infection indicators in meat goat kids and lambs. Small Ruminant Res 2016; 136: 1-6
  3. Tariq KA, Tantry MA. Preliminary studies on plants with anthelmintic properties in Kashmir - The North-West Temperate Himalayan Region of India. Chinese Med 2012; 3: 106-112
  4. Shalaby HA. Anthelmintics resistance: how to overcome it? Iran J Parasitol 2013; 8: 18-32
  5. Rahmann, G, Siep H. Alternative strategies to prevent and control endoparasite diseases in organic sheep and goat farming systems – a review of current scientific knowledge. Sonderhefte der Landbauforschung Völkenrode 2006; 298: 49-90
  6. Feitosa TF, Vilela VLR, Athayde AC, Braga FR, Dantas ES, Vieira VD, de Melo LR. Anthelmintic efficacy of pumpkin seed (Cucurbita pepo Linnaeus, 1753) on ostrich gastrointestinal nematodes in a semiarid region of Paraíba State, Brazil. Trop Anim Health Prod 2013; 45: 123-127
  7. Grzybek M, Kukula-Koch W, Strachecka A, Jaworska A, Phiri AM, Paleolog J, Tomczuk K. Evaluation of anthelmintic activity and composition of pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) seed extracts – in vitro and in vivo studies. Int J Mol Sci 2016; 17: 1456
  8. Ullah S, Khan MN, Sajid MS, Muhammad G. Comparative anthelmintic efficacy of Curcuma longa, Citrullus colocynthis and Peganum harmala. Global Vet 2013; 11: 560-567
  9. Groot M, van Asseldonk T, IP van der Kamp IP. Natural Poultry Health. Wageningen, the Netherlands: BioKennis; 2001
  10. Permin A, Hansen JW. Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Control of Poultry Parasites. FAO Animal Health Manual. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 1998
  11. Nolan T, Church M, Knight D, Gilson D, Dykhouse C, Mah K. McMaster Egg Counting Technique. VPTH 603 Veterinary Parasitology. Philadelphia, PA, USA: University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine; 2006
  12. Henderson CF, EW Tilton EW. Tests with acaricides against brown wheat mite. J Econ Entomol 1955; 48: 157-161
  13. Yazwinski TA, Chapman HD, Davis RB, Letonja T, Pote L, Maes L, Vercruysse J, Jac