Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 6

Abdominal ultrasonographic findings in dogs with mammary tumors: association with tumor characteristics and survival

Pages
808–816
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, the presence of intraabdominal lymph nodeenlargement identified by ultrasound may be associated with regional metastasis and shorter survival rates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abdominal ultrasound is frequently performed as part of initial staging of canine mammary tumors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The medical records of 201 female dogs diagnosed with mammarytumors that had abdominal ultrasonography performed as part of their initial clinical evaluation were reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, the presence of intraabdominal lymph nodeenlargement identified by ultrasound may be associated with regional metastasis and shorter survival rates.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Abdominal ultrasound is frequently performed as part of initial staging of canine mammary tumors. The aims of this studywere to describe abdominal ultrasonographic findings present at diagnosis of mammary tumors in dogs and to assess their value forassociations with histopathological results and treatment outcome. The medical records of 201 female dogs diagnosed with mammarytumors that had abdominal ultrasonography performed as part of their initial clinical evaluation were reviewed. Histopathologicaldiagnosis of malignant mammary tumors was obtained in most cases (86%; 172 cases). One hundred and fifty-seven animals (78%)had some ultrasonographic abnormality. A total of 338 ultrasonographic changes were identified, and the spleen was the organ with thehighest frequency of ultrasonographic changes (20%), followed by the uterus (18%) and the liver (16%). Abdominal ultrasonographyabnormalities were not associated with mammary tumor malignancy (OR = 1.7; P = 0.27). Ultrasonographic evidence of enlargedintraabdominal lymph nodes was associated with metastases in surface regional lymph nodes (P < 0.05). Dogs with regional metastasiswere more likely to present some abdominal ultrasonographic change (OR = 6.1; P = 0.04). Animals with ultrasonographic evidence ofintraabdominal lymph node enlargement presented shorter survival after mastectomy. Abdominal ultrasonographic abnormalities arecommon in dogs with mammary tumors and are not associated with malignancy. However, the presence of intraabdominal lymph nodeenlargement identified by ultrasound may be associated with regional metastasis and shorter survival rates.

🔖

Cite This Article

RIBEIRO, C. L., FILHO, J. R. E., FROES, T. R., JULIANI, A. I., GUERIOS, S. D., SILVA, D. M. D. (2022). Abdominal ultrasonographic findings in dogs with mammary tumors: association with tumor characteristics and survival. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 6, 808–816. https://ajindex.com/articles/614834

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Sorenmo K. Canine mammary gland tumors. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice 2003
  2. doi: 10.1016/S0195-5616(03)00020-2 2. Meuten DJ. Tumors in Domestic Animals. 5th ed. Ames, IA, USA: John Wiley & Sons
  3. Owen LN. TNM Classification of Tumors in Domestic Animals. 1st ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization
  4. Otoni CC, Rahal SC, Vulcano LC, Ribeiro SM, Hette K et al. Survey radiography and computerized tomography imaging of the thorax in female dogs with mammary tumors. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 2010
  5. doi: 10.1186/1751-0147- 52-20 5. Sorenmo KU, Rasotto R, Zappulli V, Goldschmidt MH. Development, anatomy, histology, lymphatic drainage, clinical features, and cell differentiation markers of canine mammary gland neoplasms. Veterinary Pathology 2011
  6. 48 (1): 85-97. doi: 10.1177/0300985810389480 6. Clemente M, Pérez-Alenza MD, Peña L. Metastasis of canine inflammatory versus non-inflammatory mammary tumours. Journal of Comparative Pathology 2010
  7. 143 (2-3): 157-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2010.02.002 7. Sacornrattana O, Dervisis NG, McNiel EA. Abdominal ultrasonographic findings at diagnosis of osteosarcoma in dogs and association with treatment outcome. Veterinary and Comparative Oncology 2013
  8. 11 (3): 199-207. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5829.2011.00312.x 8. Bigio Marcello A, Gieger TL, Jiménez DA, Granger LA. Detection of comorbidities and synchronous primary tumours via thoracic radiography and abdominal ultrasonography and their influence on treatment outcome in dogs with soft tissue sarcomas, primary brain tumours and intranasal tumours. Veterinary and Comparative Oncology 2015
  9. 13 (4): 433-442. doi: 10.1111/vco.12063 9. Warland J, Amores-Fuster I, Newbury W, Brearley M, Dobson J. The utility of staging in canine mast cell tumours. Veterinary and Comparative Oncology 2014
  10. 12 (4): 287-298. doi: 10.1111/ vco.12012 10. Tong NM, Zwingenberger AL, Blair WH, Taylor SL, Chen RX et al. Effect of screening abdominal ultrasound examination on the decision to pursue advanced diagnostic tests and treatment in dogs with neurologic disease. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 2015
  11. 29 (3): 893-899. doi: 10.1111/jvim.12602 11. Secchi P, Pöppl AG, Ilha A, Kunert Filho HC, Lima FE et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and biochemical markers in dogs with ultrasound-diagnosed biliary sludge. Research in Veterinary Science 2012
  12. 93 (3): 1185-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2012.03.009 12. Webb JA, Kirby GM, Nykamp SG