Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1

Influence of rearing conditions and birth season on calf welfare in the first month of life

Pages
102–109
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, average body mass ofcalves was significantly higher on farm B than of those on farm A at all ages (on birth, at 8 days, and 30 days).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of farm conditions and season of birth on body mass, respiratory systemdiseases and diarrhea occurrence, and mortality during the first month of calves’ life.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the first consumption, they take 1–2 L of colostrum produced by their mother or by another cow (farm A), or 2.5–3 L ofcolostrum produced by their mother or by another cow or frozen colostrum (farm B).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, average body mass ofcalves was significantly higher on farm B than of those on farm A at all ages (on birth, at 8 days, and 30 days).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of farm conditions and season of birth on body mass, respiratory systemdiseases and diarrhea occurrence, and mortality during the first month of calves’ life. The study was conducted on two tie-stall–systemfarms with intensive milk production and similar nutrition of dairy cows, but with differences in rearing conditions of calves in the firstweek of life. The calves were tied on lying area with straw as bedding material (farm A) or free in individual boxes with straw bedding(farm B). In the first consumption, they take 1–2 L of colostrum produced by their mother or by another cow (farm A), or 2.5–3 L ofcolostrum produced by their mother or by another cow or frozen colostrum (farm B). According to the results, average body mass ofcalves was significantly higher on farm B than of those on farm A at all ages (on birth, at 8 days, and 30 days). Mortality rate and diarrheaoccurrence in calves were higher on farm B, while respiratory system diseases incidence was higher on farm A. All observed welfareindicators were very significantly (P < 0.01) influenced by farm conditions and birth season.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAMOLOVAC, L., ZLATANOVIC, Z., MALETIC, R., STANKOVIC, B., HRISTOV, S., RELIC, R. (2022). Influence of rearing conditions and birth season on calf welfare in the first month of life. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1, 102–109. https://ajindex.com/articles/614824

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Anon. Welfare Quality: Assessment protocol for cattle. 6th Framework Research, FOOD-CT-2004-506508. 2009
  2. Anon. EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW). Scientific opinion on the welfare of cattle kept for beef production and the welfare in intensive calf farming systems. EFSA Journal 2012; 10: 2669
  3. Anon. Animal welfare and dairy cattle production systems, Chapter 7.11. In: Terrestrial Animal Health Code, 2017. pp. 1-14
  4. Vasseur E, Rushen J, De Passillé AM, Lefebvre D, Pellerin D. An advisory tool to improve management practices affecting calf and heifer welfare on dairy farms. J Dairy Sci 2010; 92: 4414-4426
  5. Relić R, Bojkovski J. Housing conditions in calves’ welfare risk assessment. J Agric Sci 2010; 55: 283-292
  6. Hristov S, Stanković B, Todorović-Joksimović M, Mekić C, Zlatanović Z, Ostojić-Andrić D, Maksimović N. Welfare problems in dairy calves. Biotech Anim Husbandry 2011; 27: 1417-1424
  7. Bojkovski J, Pavlović I, Relić R, Bugarski D, Savić B, Panousis N. Giadinis N, Stanković B, Petrujkić T. Health problems and welfare of calves in intensive production. In: Zbornik XXVI Savetovanja Agronoma, Veterinara, Tehnologa I Agroekonomista, 22–23. February, 2012. Belgrade, Serbia 18: 85-91 (article in Serbian with an English abstract)
  8. Stanek S, Zink V, Doležal O, Štolc L. Survey of preweaning dairy calf-rearing practices in Czech dairy herds. J Dairy Sci 2014; 97: 3973-3981
  9. Hepola H, Hänninen L, Pursiainen P, Tuure V-M, Syrjälä -Qvist L, Pyykkönen M, Saloniemi H. Feed intake and oral behaviour of dairy calves housed individually or in groups in warm or cold buildings. Livest Sci 2006; 105: 94-104
  10. Borderas FT, De Passillé AMB, Rushen J. Temperature preferences and feed level of the newborn dairy calf. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2009; 120: 56-61
  11. Hadživuković S. Planiranje eksperimenata. Beograd, Privredni pregled, 1977 (in Croatian)
  12. Cohen JW. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988
  13. Olson KM, Cassell BG, Mcallister AJ, Washburn SP. Dystocia, stillbirth, gestation length, and birth weight in Holstein, Jersey, and reciprocal crosses from a planned experiment. J Dairy Sci 2009; 92: 6167-6175
  14. Ballou M, Cobb CJ, Earleywine TJ, Obeidat BS. Breed and plane of milk-replacer nutrition influence the performance of pre-and postweaned dairy calves. PAS 2013; 29: 116-123
  15. Heins BJ, Hansen LB, Hazel AR, Seykora AJ, Johnson DG, Linn JG. Birth tr