SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 1

The clinical outcome of three procedures for extraarticular stabilization of cranial cruciate ligament injuries in dogs

Roxana DASCALU
Cornel IGNA
Daniel BUMB
Bogdan SICOE
Cristian ZAHA
Larisa SCHÜSZLER
Pages
131–141
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall complication rate was 16.3% and the documentedcomplication rate requiring implant removal was 0%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament injury in which thestifle was stabilized with lateral suture stabilization, lateral suture stabilization-modified, or Securos lateral bone anchor tibial suture andmonofilament nylon sutures placed at quasi-isometric points of the stifle.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is a retrospective study comprising a sample population of49 client-owned dogs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall complication rate was 16.3% and the documentedcomplication rate requiring implant removal was 0%.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2014–2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament injury in which thestifle was stabilized with lateral suture stabilization, lateral suture stabilization-modified, or Securos lateral bone anchor tibial suture andmonofilament nylon sutures placed at quasi-isometric points of the stifle. It is a retrospective study comprising a sample population of49 client-owned dogs. Medical records from 2014–2016 were reviewed to identify dogs that had a cranial cruciate ligament rupture inwhich the stifle was stabilized using one of the aforementioned methods. The overall complication rate was 16.3% and the documentedcomplication rate requiring implant removal was 0%. Owners reported full or acceptable function in 96% of cases. There were nosignificant statistical differences between the 3 techniques. Stabilization of cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifles in dogs withlateral suture stabilization, lateral suture stabilization-modified, or Securos lateral bone anchor tibial suture is reliable with acceptablecomplication rates. The 3 procedures tested may be appropriate in medium-sized nonathletic dogs whose owners have limited budgets.

🔖

Cite This Article

DASCALU, R., IGNA, C., BUMB, D., SICOE, B., ZAHA, C., SCHÜSZLER, L. (2022). The clinical outcome of three procedures for extraarticular stabilization of cranial cruciate ligament injuries in dogs. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 1, 131–141. https://ajindex.com/articles/614795

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. DeAngelis M, Lau RE. A lateral retinacular imbrication technique for the surgical correction of anterior cruciate ligament rupture in the dog. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 1970; 157 (1): 79-84
  2. Flo GC. Modification of the lateral retinacular imbrication technique for stabilizing cruciate ligament injuries. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 1975; 11: 570-576
  3. Brinker WO, Piermattei DL, Flo GL. Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Treatment. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Saunders; 1990
  4. Singer MJ, Pijanowski G, Wiley R, Johnson AL, Siegel AM. Biomechanical evaluation of a veterinary suture anchor in the canine cadaver pelvis and femur. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2005; 18 (1): 31-36. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1632925 5. Robb JL, Cook JL, Carson W. In vitro evaluation of screws and suture anchors in Metaphyseal bone of the canine Tibia. Veterinary Surgery 2005; 34 (5): 499-508. doi: 10.1111/j.1551- 2916.2005.00075.x 6. Giles JT 3rd, Coker D, Rochat MC, Payton ME, Subramarian V et al. Biomechanical analysis of suture anchors and suture materials in the canine femur. Veterinary Surgery 2008; 37 (1): 12-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2007. 00341.x 7. Choate CJ, Pozzi A, Lewis DD, Hudson CC, Conrad BP. In vitro comparison of construct elongation associated with the lateral circumfabellar suture, Tightrope Ccl and Swivelock bone anchor for extracapsular stabilization of the cranial cruciate ligamentdeficient stifle in dogs. Veterinary Surgery 2011; 40 (7): E23. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00896.x 8. Edwards M, Taylor RA, Franceschi RA. Clinical case applications of Mitek tissue anchors in veterinary orthopedics. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 1993; 6 (4): 208-212. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1633060 9. Guenego L, Zahra A, Madelenat A, Gautier R, Marcellin-Little DJ et al. Cranial cruciate ligament rupture in large and giant dogs. A retrospective evaluation of a modified lateral extracapsular stabilization. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2007; 20 (1): 43-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1616587 10. Hulse D, Saunders B, Beale B, Kowaleski M. Extra-articular stabilization of the cranial cruciate deficient stifle with anchor systems. Tierarztliche Praxis Ausgabe K: Kleintiere - Heimtiere 2011; 39 (5): 363-367. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1623601 11. D’Amico LL, Lanz OI, Aulakh KS, Butler JR, McLaughlin RM et al. The effects of a novel lateral extracapsular s