SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 4

Determination of nutritional value of some quinoa varieties

Tugay AYAŞAN
Pages
950–954
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the study, it was found that there were statistically significant differences between the quinoa varieties in terms of dry matter (DM), crude ash (CA), crude protein (CP), crude fat (CF), neutral-detergent fiber (NDF), acid-detergent fiber (ADF), crude cellulose (CC), hemicellulose (HC), total digestible nutrients (TDN), digestible energy (DE), metabolizable energy (ME), and net energy lactation (NEL) (P < 0.05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to determine the nutritive value of 5 quinoa varieties (Inia431- Altiplano, White, Titicaca, Illpa Inia, and Carmen).
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of the study, it was found that there were statistically significant differences between the quinoa varieties in terms of dry matter (DM), crude ash (CA), crude protein (CP), crude fat (CF), neutral-detergent fiber (NDF), acid-detergent fiber (ADF), crude cellulose (CC), hemicellulose (HC), total digestible nutrients (TDN), digestible energy (DE), metabolizable energy (ME), and net energy lactation (NEL) (P < 0.05).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In vivo and vitro studies are required.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the nutritive value of 5 quinoa varieties (Inia431- Altiplano, White, Titicaca, Illpa Inia, and Carmen). As a result of the study, it was found that there were statistically significant differences between the quinoa varieties in terms of dry matter (DM), crude ash (CA), crude protein (CP), crude fat (CF), neutral-detergent fiber (NDF), acid-detergent fiber (ADF), crude cellulose (CC), hemicellulose (HC), total digestible nutrients (TDN), digestible energy (DE), metabolizable energy (ME), and net energy lactation (NEL) (P < 0.05). This is a preliminary study. In vivo and vitro studies are required.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYAŞAN, T. (2022). Determination of nutritional value of some quinoa varieties. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 4, 950–954. https://ajindex.com/articles/614792

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Demir MK, Kılınç M. Quinoa: Nutritional and anti-nutritional characteristics. Journal of Food and Health Science 2016; 2 (3): 104-111. doi: 10.3153/jfhs16011 2. İnan S, Ayaşan T. Anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer effects of kinoa as future food. In: International Eurasian Congress on Natural Nutrition and Healthy Life; Ankara, Turkey; 2018. pp. 143-14 3. Geren H, Güre E. A preliminary study on the effect of different N and P levels on the grain yield and other yield components of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.). Ege University Agricultural Faculty Journal 2017; 54 (1): 1-8. 4. Sharma G, Lakhawat S. Nutrition facts and functional potential of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa), an ancient Andean grain: A review. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2017; 6 (4): 1488-1489. 5. Dağ ŞRO, Özkan AMG. A review on quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.) Journal of Faculty Pharmacy of Ankara University 2019; 43 (3): 309-333. doi: 10.33483/jfpau.487757 6. Ayaşan Ş, Ayaşan T. Using quinoa in human and animal nutrition. In: Central Anatolia Region 3rd Agriculture and Food Congress; Sivas, Turkey; 2017. pp. 409-410. 7. James LEA. Quinoa composition, chemistry, nutritional and functional properties. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research 2009; 58 (1): 1-31. doi: 10.1016/s1043-4526(09)58001-1 8. Kaya E, Karaer M. Kinoa growing and the importance of health. Turkish Journal of Scientific Reviews 2017; 10 (2): 21- 26. 9. Turp GY, Sucu Ç. Köfte üretiminde gluten içermeyen bir katkı olarak kinoa kullanımı. In: Türkiye 12. Gıda Kongresi; Edirne, Turkey; 2016. pp. 1-26 (in Turkish). 10. Geren H, Kavut YT, Topçu GD, Ekren S, İştipliler D. Effects of different sowing dates on the grain yield and some yield components of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.) grown under Mediterranean climatic conditions. Ege University Agricultural Faculty Journal 2014; 51 (3): 297-305. 11. Sezen SM, Tekin S, Yıldız M. Water-yield relations and economic evaluation of quinoa irrigated with drainage water in the Cukurova Region. Derim 2018; 35 (2): 173-185. 12. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed. Washington, DC: Association Official Analytical Chemists; 1990. 13. Van-Soest PJ, Robertson JD, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 1991; 74 (10): 3583-3597. 14. Pinkerton B. Forage quality. Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service. Forage Fact Sheet; 2005. 15. Tekce