SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 4

Replacement of corn and soybean meal with corn gluten meal on rooster’s diet

Sérgio Leandro Costa de ÁVILA
Carolina Oreques de OLIVEIRA
Tiago Araújo RODRIGUES
Amauri Telles TAVARES
Sara Lorandi SOARES
Alexsander FERRAZ
Silvia Maria Lannes de Campos da COSTA
Denise Calisto BONGALHARDO
Marcos Antonio ANCIUTI
Mônica Corrêa LEDUR
Pages
798–804
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results showed that there was no significant difference between treatments, which allows the use of 10% of corn gluten meal in rooster’s diet.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Using alternative feedstuffs to replace corn and soybean in domestic poultry diets, as agroindustry by-products, may reduce production costs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Aiming to evaluate the use of this ingredient in rooster’s diet and its effects on sperm characteristics, 40 roosters with 68 to 72 weeks of age, randomly distributed in individual boxes, were tested.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results showed that there was no significant difference between treatments, which allows the use of 10% of corn gluten meal in rooster’s diet.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Using alternative feedstuffs to replace corn and soybean in domestic poultry diets, as agroindustry by-products, may reduce production costs. Corn gluten meal is a by-product resulting of corn processing to obtain oil and starch. Aiming to evaluate the use of this ingredient in rooster’s diet and its effects on sperm characteristics, 40 roosters with 68 to 72 weeks of age, randomly distributed in individual boxes, were tested. Two treatments were used: treatment 1 (control) – with corn and soybean meal, and treatment 2 – with 10% of corn gluten meal in the diet. Semen collection and body weight verification were performed during 4 weeks. Semen variables evaluated were volume, sperm concentration, motility, membrane integrity, acrosome integrity, and DNA integrity. Results showed that there was no significant difference between treatments, which allows the use of 10% of corn gluten meal in rooster’s diet. Therefore, corn gluten meal can be an alternative diet’s input, especially when there is corn or soybean market restriction

🔖

Cite This Article

ÁVILA, S. L. C. D., OLIVEIRA, C. O. D., RODRIGUES, T. A., TAVARES, A. T., SOARES, S. L., FERRAZ, A., COSTA, S. M. L. D. C. D., BONGALHARDO, D. C., ANCIUTI, M. A., LEDUR, M. C. (2022). Replacement of corn and soybean meal with corn gluten meal on rooster’s diet. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 4, 798–804. https://ajindex.com/articles/614790

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Rizzo PV, Menten JFM, Racanicci AMC, TraldiAB, Silva CS et al. Plant extracts in diets for broilers. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 2010
  2. 39 (4): 801-807 (in Portuguese with abstract in English). doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982010000400015 2. Filardi RS, Junqueira OM, Laurentiz AC, Casartelli EM, Assuena V et al. Rice brain utilization in commercial laying hens diets formulated on total and digestible amino acid basis. Ciência Animal Brasileira 2007
  3. 8 (3): 397-405 (in Portuguese with abstract in English). 3. Soares MB, Fuentes MFF, Freitas ER. Cashew nut meal in laying diets for Japanese quails. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 2007
  4. 36 (4): 1076-1082 (in Portuguese with abstract in English). doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982007000500013 4. Rostagno HS, Albino LFT, Donzele JL, Gomes PC, De Oliveira RF et al. Tabelas Brasileiras para Aves e Suínos: Composição de Alimentos e Exigências Nutricionais. 3rd ed. Viçosa, MG, Brazil: UFV
  5. Freitas AC, Reis JC, Lana GRQ, Fuentes MF, Sampaio IBM et al. Refinazila ingrediente in broilers diet. Revista Cientifica de Produção Animal 2006
  6. 8 (1):11-20 (in Portuguese with abstract in English). doi: 10.15528/401 6. Maggioni D, Rotta PP, Marques JA, Zawardzki F, Prado RM et al. The influence of protein on animal reproduction: a review. Campo Digital 2008
  7. 1 (2):105-110 (in Portuguese with abstract in English). 7. Gonçalves FM, Santos VL, Farina G, Oliveira CO, Anciuti MA et al. Nutritional aspects and reproductive management of roosters in Brazil. World’s Poultry Science Journal 2015
  8. 71 (3): 515-522. doi: 10.1017/S0043933915002238 8. Rutz F, Anciuti MA, Xavier EG, Roll VFB, Rossi P. Advances in physiology of reproduction in poultry. Revista Brasileira Reprodução Animal 2007
  9. 31 (3): 307-317 (in Portuguese with abstract in English). 9. Bongalhardo DC. Desafios da Biologia da Reprodução. In: Macari M, Gonzales E, Patrício IN, Nääs IA, Martins PC. (Org.). Manejo da Incubação. 3rd ed. Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil: FACTA
  10. pp. 87-92. 10. Burrows WH, Quinn JP. The collection of spermatozoa from the domestic fowl and turkey. Poultry Science 1937
  11. 14 (1): 252-254. doi: 10.3382/ps.0160019 11. Van Der Laan GM. Criopreservação de sêmen de galo. MSc, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil, 2007. 12. Merkies K, Chenier T, Plante C, Buhr MM. Assessment of stallion spermatozoa viability by flow cytometry and light microscope analyses. Theriogenology 2000
  12. 54 (8): 1215-1224. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00428-3 13. Kawamoto A, Kazutomo