Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2

First molecular characterization of the facultative myiasis agent Eristalis tenax in Turkey using mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I DNA barcoding sequences

Pages
449–455
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Interspecific genetic differences between E. tenax and otherEristalis species were in the range of 5.7% to 7.9%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This report is the first molecular characterization of the facultative myiasis agent Eristalis tenax collected from cattle barnsin Kayseri province of Central Anatolia, Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 10 adult fly specimens were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Interspecific genetic differences between E. tenax and otherEristalis species were in the range of 5.7% to 7.9%.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This report is the first molecular characterization of the facultative myiasis agent Eristalis tenax collected from cattle barnsin Kayseri province of Central Anatolia, Turkey. A total of 10 adult fly specimens were included in the study. All flies were identified asfemale adults of E. tenax by morphologic characteristics under a stereomicroscope. The barcode region of the mitochondrial cytochromeoxidase 1 (CO1) gene was amplified with PCR from the genomic DNA extracts of E. tenax specimens for molecular identificationand phylogenetic analyses. There was no polymorphism among the CO1 sequences of all isolates leading to the detection of a singlehaplotype for E. tenax. Haplotype and nucleotide diversities in the CO1 data set comprised of the sequence of the detected haplotypeand the published sequences of E. tenax from different countries in GenBank were determined as 0.775 and 0.002, respectively. Thenewly characterized haplotype in this study clustered with the haplotypes from Australia and Canada in a monophyletic clade andexhibited a 100.0% identity to the Australian E. tenax isolate (JN991985). Interspecific genetic differences between E. tenax and otherEristalis species were in the range of 5.7% to 7.9%.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, A., İNCİ, A., OKUR, M. (2022). First molecular characterization of the facultative myiasis agent Eristalis tenax in Turkey using mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I DNA barcoding sequences. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2, 449–455. https://ajindex.com/articles/614785

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Thompson FC, Rotheray G. Family Syrphidae. In: Papp L, Darvas B (editors). Manual of Palaearctic Diptera. 3rd ed. Budapest, Hungary: Science Herald; 1998. pp. 81-139
  2. Francuski L, Djurakic M, Ludoški J, Milankov V. Landscape genetics and spatial pattern of phenotypic variation of Eristalis tenax across Europe. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 2013; 51 (3): 227-238. doi: 10.1111/ jzs.12017 3. Guo Y, Zhang X, Shao Y, Li J. Evaluation of diversity and abundance of pollinating insects on oilseed rape in major planting area of China. International Journal of Agricultural Policy and Research 2017; 5 (6): 117-124. doi: 10.15739/ IJAPR.17.013 4. Buckton GB. The Natural History of Eristalis tenax or the Drone-fly. London, UK: Macmillan; 1895
  3. Mehrabi R, Ssymank A. Species composition and flower visiting by Syrphidae (Diptera) in north-eastern Iran. Zoology in the Middle East 2008; 45 (1): 73-78. doi: 10.1080/09397140.2008.10638309 6. Patnaik H, Satapathy C, Panda N. Prevalence, species richness and diversity of flower visiting insects at Bhubaneswar (Odisha). Journal of Plant Protection and Environment 2012; 9 (1): 1-10
  4. Howlett BG, Gee M. The potential management of the drone fly (Eristalis tenax) as a crop pollinator in New Zealand. New Zealand Plant Protection 2019; 72: 221-230. doi: 10.30843/ nzpp.2019.72.304 8. Golding Y, Edmunds M. Behavioural mimicry of honeybees (Apis mellifera) by droneflies (Diptera: Syrphidae: Eristalis spp.). Proceedings of the Royal Society B. Biological sciences 2000; 267 (1446): 903-909. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1088 9. Golding YC, Ennos AR, Edmunds M. Similarity in flight behaviour between the honeybee Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and its presumed mimic, the dronefly Eristalis tenax (Diptera: Syrphidae). The Journal of Experimental Biology 2001; 204: 139-145
  5. Howarth B, Edmunds M, Gilbert F. Does the abundance of hoverfly (Syrphidae) mimics depend on the numbers of their hymenopteran models? Evolution 2004; 58 (2): 367-375. doi: 10.1554/02-491 11. Pérez-Bañón C, Rojo S, Ståhls G, Marcos-García M. Taxonomy of European Eristalinus (Diptera: Syrphidae) based on larval morphology and molecular data. European Journal of Entomology 2003; 100 (3): 417-428. doi: 10.14411/eje.2003.064 12. Riedel L, Lunau K. Limitations of the innate proboscis reflex in Eristalis tenax L. (Diptera: Syrphidae) by the spatial resolution of the compound eye. Entomologie Heute 2015; 27: 45-54
  6. Gerhardt RR, Hrib