SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 5

In vitro antibiotic resistance of Staphylococci isolated from different animal species

Nurdan KARACAN SEVER
Mehmet AKAN
Pages
1055–1062
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Additionally, the presence of high oxacillin resistance and multidrug resistance in the Staphylococcus strains revealed the importance of determination of antimicrobial susceptibility before treatment and for rational use of antibiotics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to investigate resistance to antibiotics of Staphylococcus species isolated from various samples belonging to different animal species.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Among 48 Staphylococcus spp. strains, Staphylococcus intermedius was the most common species, followed by S. aureus, S. epidermidis, S. hyicus, S. saprophyticus.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Additionally, the presence of high oxacillin resistance and multidrug resistance in the Staphylococcus strains revealed the importance of determination of antimicrobial susceptibility before treatment and for rational use of antibiotics.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate resistance to antibiotics of Staphylococcus species isolated from various samples belonging to different animal species. Among 48 Staphylococcus spp. strains, Staphylococcus intermedius was the most common species, followed by S. aureus, S. epidermidis, S. hyicus, S. saprophyticus. In a total of 48 Staphylococcus strains, the highest antibiotic resistance was observed to oxacillin (79.17%), tetracycline (39.58%), and ampicillin and cefoxitin (31.25%). Of 48 Staphylococcus strains, 42 showed resistance to at least one antimicrobial agent, while 23 of the strains had multidrug resistance. Antimicrobial resistance to tetracycline and ampicillin, erythromycin, streptomycin was detected frequently in S. aureus,S. intermedius, and S. epidermidis, respectively. Resistance rates for ampicillin, cefoxitin, and enrofloxacin were determined as 66.67% in S. hyicus strains. S. saprophyticus was determined to show resistance to 13 antibiotics other than meropenem. The highest antibiotic resistance was determined in S. aureus, S. intermedius, S. epidermidis, and in 48 Staphylococcus strains to oxacillin. Consequently, this study revealed resistance to various antibiotics in Staphylococcus species. Additionally, the presence of high oxacillin resistance and multidrug resistance in the Staphylococcus strains revealed the importance of determination of antimicrobial susceptibility before treatment and for rational use of antibiotics.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEVER, N. K., AKAN, M. (2022). In vitro antibiotic resistance of Staphylococci isolated from different animal species. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 5, 1055–1062. https://ajindex.com/articles/614778

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Rich M. Staphylococci in animals: prevalence, identification and antimicrobial susceptibility, with an emphasis on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. British Journal of Biomedical Science 2005; 62 (2): 98-105
  2. Markey B, Leonard F, Archambault M, Cullinane A, Maguire D. Staphylococcus species. In: Edwards R, Hewat C (editor). Clinical Veterinary Microbiology. 2th. ed. Missouri, USA: Mosby Elsevier; 2013. pp. 105-119
  3. Smeltzer MS, Beenken KE. Staphylococcus. In: McVey DS, Kennedy M, Chengappa MM (editor). Veterinary Microbiology. 3th. ed. Iowa, USA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. pp. 184-193
  4. Bond R, Loeffler A. What’s happened to Staphylococcus intermedius? Taxonomic revision and emergence of multi‐drug resistance. Journal of Small Animal Practice 2012; 53 (3): 147- 154. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2011.01165.x 5. Ross Fitzgerald J. The Staphylococcus intermedius group of bacterial pathogens: species re‐classification, pathogenesis and the emergence of methicillin resistance. Veterinary Dermatology 2009; 20 (5-6): 490-495. doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 3164.2009.00828.x 6. Hermans K, Devriese LA, Haesebrouck F. Staphylococcus. In: Gyles CL, Presscott JF, Songer G, Thoen CO (editor). Pathogenesis of Bacterial Infections in Animals. 4th. ed. Iowa, USA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. pp.75-89
  5. Devriese LA, Vancanneyt M, Baele M, Vaneechoutte M, De Graef E, et al. Staphylococcus pseudintermedius sp. nov., a coagulase-positive species from animals. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 2005; 55 (4): 1569-1573. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63413-0 8. Van Duijkeren E, Catry B, Greko C, Moreno MA, Pomba MC, et al. Review on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2011; 66 (12): 2705- 2714. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr367 9. Akan M. Staphylococcusİnfeksiyonları. In: Aydın N, Paracıkoğlu J (editor). VeterinerMikrobiyoloji (BakteriyelHastalıklar). 1th. ed. Ankara, TÜRKİYE: İlke-EmekYayınları; 2006. pp. 5-13
  6. Simoons-Smit A, Savelkoul P, Stoof J, Starink T, VandenbrouckeGrauls C. Transmission of Staphylococcus aureus between humans and domestic animals in a household. The European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 2000; 19 (2): 150- 152. doi: 10.1007/s100960050450 11. Tanner MA, Everett CL, Youvan DC. Molecular phylogenetic evidence for noninvasive zoonotic transmission of Staphylococcus intermedius from a canine pet to a human. The Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2000; 38 (4): 1628-1