Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 6

The effect of year, month, region, and herd size on bulk tank somatic cell and standard plate count, and the determination of optimum herd size in the intensive Holstein Friesian dairy farms in the Turkish Republic of Cyprus

Pages
1232–1242
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The number of bulk tank SPC was found to be significantly higher in flocks with

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of this study was to determine the effects of mount, year, region, and herd size on the bulk tank somatic cell count (SCC) and standard plate count (SPC) and total milk production of Holstein Friesian cows and to decide for optimum herd size in Northern Cyprus.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The total number of cattle was 64,450 heads and the number of enterprises was 168 in 2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The number of bulk tank SPC was found to be significantly higher in flocks with
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of mount, year, region, and herd size on the bulk tank somatic cell count (SCC) and standard plate count (SPC) and total milk production of Holstein Friesian cows and to decide for optimum herd size in Northern Cyprus. The total number of cattle was 64,450 heads and the number of enterprises was 168 in 2016. The milk samples were collected once or twice a month from each herd. SCC and SPC were determined with the Fluoro-opto-electronic counter method. Herd sizes were described from small to extra-large enterprises for Northern Cyprus conditions and six groups were created. The least squares means were compared among the herd size, region, month, and year for the data set. From 2012 to 2016, there was a significant amount (39.49%) of increase in milk production. While the total share of the enterprises which sold chilled milk was 22.36–28.82% in 2012–2016, the chilled milk production corresponded to 71.7–79% of all the dairy market. Bulk tank SCC numbers were found to be significantly higher in herds smaller than 40 and larger than 200 heads (P < 0.05). In the medium-sized enterprises (40–150 heads, Groups 2, 3, and 4), the number of bulk tank SCC was below the threshold level (400,000 cells/mL). The number of bulk tank SPC was found to be significantly higher in flocks with

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSOY, H. D. (2022). The effect of year, month, region, and herd size on bulk tank somatic cell and standard plate count, and the determination of optimum herd size in the intensive Holstein Friesian dairy farms in the Turkish Republic of Cyprus. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 6, 1232–1242. https://ajindex.com/articles/614711

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Smith JW, Guthrie LD, Ely LO. Effect of herd size on management variables in Holstein herds. Journal of Dairy Science 1995; 98 ( Suppl. 1 ): 318
  2. Bailey K, Hardin D, Spain J, Garrett J, Hoehne J et al. An economic simulation study of large-scale dairy units in the Midwest. Journal of Dairy Science1997; 80: pp. 205-214
  3. Oleggini GH, Ely LO, Smith JW. Effect of region and herd size on dairy herd performance parameters. Journal of Dairy Science 2001; 84: pp. 1044-1050 4. Hill DL, Wall E. Dairy cattle in a temperate climate: the effects of weather on milk yield and composition depend on management. Animal2015; 9(1): 138-49 doi: 10.1017/ S1751731114002456 5. Quintão LC, Cunha AF, da Bragança LJ, Coelho KS, Nunes MF et al. Evolution and factors influencing somatic cell count in raw milk from farms in Viçosa, state of Minas Gerais. Acta Science, Animal Science 2017; 39 (4) doi: 10.4025/ actascianimsci.v39i4.35364 6. Archer SC, McCoy F, Wapenaar W, Green MJ. Association of season and herd size with somatic cell count for cows in Irish, English, and Welsh dairy herds. Veterinary Journal 2013; 196: pp. 515-521
  4. Ingham SC, Hu Y, Anet C. Comparison of bulk-tank standard plate count and somatic cell count for Wisconsin dairy farms in three size categories. Journal of Dairy Science 2011; 94: 4237- 424. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4310
  5. Srairi MT, Benhouda H, Kuper M, Le Gal PY. Effect of cattle management practices on raw milk quality on farms operating in a two-stage dairy chain. Tropical animal health and production 2009; 41 (2): 259-272
  6. Seegers H, Fourichon C, Beaudeau F. Production effects related to mastitis and mastitis economics in dairy cattle herds. Veterinary Research 2003; 34 (5): 475-491. doi: 10.1051/ vetres:2003027 10. Murphy SC, Boor KJ. Trouble-shooting sources and causes of high bacteria counts in raw milk. Dairy Food Environment Sanitation 2000; 20: 606- 611
  7. Schukken YH, Wilson DJ, Welcome F, Garrison-Tikofsky L, Gonzalez RN. Monitoring udder health and milk quality using somatic cell counts. Veterinary Research 2003; 34 (5): 579-596. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2003028 12. Neave FK, Dodd FH, Kingwill RG, Westgarth DR. Control of mastitis in the dairy herd by hygiene and management. Journal of Dairy Science 1969; 52: pp: 696-707
  8. Reneau JK, Schukken YH, Wilson DJ, Barkema HW. Somatic cell counts: meausures of farm management and milk quaility. In: Proceedings of National Mastits Council, Regional Meeting, Syracuse, New York 2002; pp. 1-10