Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation of larval culture and conventional PCR methods for the detection of Strongylus vulgaris in equines of Iran

Pages
814–820
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that the shedding eggs of strongylid nematodes were observed in 85%, 27.58%, and 50% of the donkeys in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari, Isfahan, and Khuzestan provinces and 12% of the horses in the Khuzestan province.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Strongylus vulgaris (S. vulgaris) is known as the equine’s most pathogenic nematode due to the extraintestinal migration in mesenteric arterial vessels.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To this aim, fresh fecal samples were obtained from 42 horses and 71 donkeys in different provinces of Iran.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that the shedding eggs of strongylid nematodes were observed in 85%, 27.58%, and 50% of the donkeys in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari, Isfahan, and Khuzestan provinces and 12% of the horses in the Khuzestan province.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Strongylus vulgaris (S. vulgaris) is known as the equine’s most pathogenic nematode due to the extraintestinal migration in mesenteric arterial vessels. Since a few kinds of S. vulgaris can threat the animals’ health and working efficiency, high precision and early detection of strongylid nematodes is essential. Traditionally, the larval coproculture method was used frequently for identification of strongylid species.The technique of larval culture is costly, time consuming, and does not have sufficient accuracy and reliability. Here, we critically evaluated the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with larval culture methods for the detection of S. vulgaris eggs in fecal samples. To this aim, fresh fecal samples were obtained from 42 horses and 71 donkeys in different provinces of Iran. All samples containing strongyle form eggs were individually cultured and third–stage (L3 ) S. vulgaris larvae were harvested from Baermann apparatus. The collected strongyle form eggs were individually kept in ethanol for molecular study. The L3 strongyle larvae were identified by morphological characteristics. The genomic DNA of strongyle eggs extracted and the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS-2) region was amplified using PCR technique. Then, the phylogenetic tree was drawn based on sequenced products. The results showed that the shedding eggs of strongylid nematodes were observed in 85%, 27.58%, and 50% of the donkeys in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari, Isfahan, and Khuzestan provinces and 12% of the horses in the Khuzestan province. Also, S. vulgaris was identified in 10 (8.85%) and 11 (9.73%) of the donkeys by larval culture and PCR methods, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis showed the Iranian S. vulgaris isolates found in clusters in other countries, and isolates of this parasite have recorded. Molecular findings of the PCR method are closer to the realistic values of S. vulgaris infection and detect a higher rate of positive samples. So, it can be applied for large scale screening programs of equine population

🔖

Cite This Article

LARKI, S., ALBORZ, A., ZEINAL, A. (2022). Evaluation of larval culture and conventional PCR methods for the detection of Strongylus vulgaris in equines of Iran. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 4, 814–820. https://ajindex.com/articles/614695

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Lichtenfels JR, Kharchenko VA, Dvojnos GM. Illustrated identification keys to strongylid parasites (Strongylidae: Nematoda) of horses, zebras and asses (Equidae). Veterinary Parasitology 2008
  2. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.04.026 2. Lichtenfels JR. Helminths of Domestic Equids: Illustrated keys to genera and species with emphasis on North American forms (Volume 42). Washington, DC, USA: The Helminthological Society of Washington
  3. Hartwich G. On the Strongylus tetracanthus problem and the systematics of the Cyathostominea (Nematoda: Strongyloidea). Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin 1986
  4. 102 (in Germany with an abstract in English). doi: 10.1002/mmnz.19860620107 4. Zhang LP, K’ung FY. Parasitic Nematodes from Equus spp. Beijing, China: China Agriculture Press, 2002 (in Chinese). 5. Tolliver SC, Lyons ET, Drudge JH. Prevalence of internal parasites in horses in critical tests of activity of parasiticides over a 28-year period (1956-1983) in Kentucky. Veterinary Parasitology 1987
  5. 23 (3-4): 273-284. doi: 10.1016/0304- 4017(87)90013-6 6. Lloyd S, Smith J, Connan RM, Hatcher MA, Hedges TR et al. Parasite control methods used by horse owners: factors predisposing to the development of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes. Veterinary Record 2000
  6. 146 (17): 487-492. doi: 10.1136/vr.146.17.487 7. O’Meara B, Mulcahy G. A survey of helminth control practices in equine establishments in Ireland. Veterinary Parasitology 2002
  7. 109 (1-2): 101-110. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(02)00249-2 8. Matthee S, Dreyer FH, Hoffmann WA, Niekerk FE. An introductory survey of helminth control practices in South Africa and anthelmintic resistance on Thoroughbred study farms in the Western Cape Province. Journal of the South African Veterinary Association 2002
  8. 73 (4): 195-200. 9. Hinney B, Wirtherle NC, Kyule M, Miethe N, Zessin K-H et al. A questionnaire survey on helminth control on horse farms in Brandenburg, Germany and the assessment of risks caused by different kinds of management. Parasitology Research 2011
  9. 109 (6): 1625-1635. doi: 10.1007/s00436-011-2362-z 10. Krecek RC, Guthrie AJ. Alternative approaches to control of cyathostomes: an African perspective. Veterinary Parasitology 1999
  10. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(99)000 95-3 11. Matthee S, Krecek RC, Milne SA. Prevalence and biodiversity of helminth parasites in donkeys from South Africa. Journal of parasitology 2000
  11. doi: 10.1645/0022- 3395(2000)086[0756PABOHP]2.0.C