Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 6

Production and egg quality traits of organic hens in a laying period under commercial conditions in Turkey

Pages
1188–1195
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conversely, yolk index significantly increased with age (P < 0.01).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The productive performance and egg quality traits of hens in an organic production system in Turkey were executed in this paper.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 6000 hens were reared in an organic system for 72 weeks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conversely, yolk index significantly increased with age (P < 0.01).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The productive performance and egg quality traits of hens in an organic production system in Turkey were executed in this paper. A total of 6000 hens were reared in an organic system for 72 weeks. Two organic certified houses each with a capacity of 3000 hens were used in the study. Mean egg production during the laying period was 303 eggs per hen. Laying rate was 80.24% for 72 weeks, while mortality was 8.85%. The internal and external egg quality traits were determined between 25 and 72 weeks. Mean egg weight was 63.03 g and shell thickness was 0.35 mm. Shape index was significantly decreased with age (P < 0.01). Mean shape index value was 76.34%. Shell breaking strength was highest (3.60 kg/cm2 ) at peak production and decreased with age (P < 0.01). Haugh unit was 98.19 and highest at 25 weeks and significantly decreased with age (P < 0.01). Mean Haugh unit was 80.39. Albumen index was highest at 25 weeks and significantly decreased (P < 0.01). Conversely, yolk index significantly increased with age (P < 0.01).

🔖

Cite This Article

SARIBAŞ, O., YAMAK, U. S. (2022). Production and egg quality traits of organic hens in a laying period under commercial conditions in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 6, 1188–1195. https://ajindex.com/articles/614694

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Elmacıoğlu F, Emiroğlu E. Hayvansal kaynaklı proteinlerin insan beslenmesindeki önemi. In: Yamak US (editor). Zootekni Hayvan Yetiştirme ve Besleme. 2.ed. Samsun, Turkey: Ceylan Ofset; 2018. pp: 17-34. (in Turkish
  2. Yum-Bir. Turkish Association of Egg producers. Annual report. Ankara, Turkey; 2018. pp. 38
  3. Elson A. The laying hen: systems of egg production. In: Perry GC (editor). Welfare of the Laying Hen. Oxfordshire, UK. CABI Publishing; 2004. pp. 67-81
  4. Sirri F, Castellini C, Banchi M, Petracci M, Meluzzi A et al. Effect of fast-, medium-, and slow-growing strains of meat quality of chickens reared under the organic farming method. Animal 2011; 5 (2): 312-319
  5. Nechaev V, Mikhailushkin P, Alieva A. Trends in demand on the organic food market in the European Countries. MATEC Web of Conferences; 2018. Pp. 212
  6. Augere-Granier ML. The EU poultry meat and egg sector. Main features, challenges and prospects. European Parliamentary Research Service. Report no: PE 644.195; 2019
  7. Eurostat.Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery Statistics. 2019 edition. ISBN: 978-92-76-13193-9; 2019. pp. 2012. doi:10.2785/798761 8. Stadelman WJ. Quality identification of shell eggs. In: StadelmanWJ and Cotterill OJ (editors) Egg Science and Technology, Chapter 3; 1995. pp. 39-66
  8. Peebles ED, McDaniel CD. A practical manual for understanding the shell structure of broiler hatching eggs and measurements of their quality. Mississippi Agric. & Forestry Experiment Station, Bulletin 1139; 2004. pp.16
  9. SPSS. IBM Corp. Released 2012. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp 11. Sarıca M, Erensayın C. Poultry Products. In: Turkoglu M, andSarıcaM (editors): Poultry Science. Bey-Ofset, Ankara, Turkey; 2018. pp. 89-138. (in Turkish
  10. Ragheb G, Al-Nasser A, Abdullah FK, Al-Bahouh ME, AlSaffar A et al. Comparative study on production efficiency of two strains of brown and white egg laying hens in Kuwait. International Journal of Poultry Science 2013; 12 (7): 383-389
  11. Lohmann Tierzuht, Management guide for alternative systems. Cuxhaven, Germany; 2020. pp: 6
  12. Leenstra F, Maurer V, Bestman M, Van Sambeek F, Zeltner E, et al. Performance of commercial laying hen genotypes on free range and organic farms in Switzerland, France and The Netherlands, British Poultry Science 2012; 53 (3): 282-290, doi: 10.1080/00071668.2012.703774 15. Türker İ, Alkan S. Yerli ve yabancı ticari kahverengi yumurtacı tavukların serbest (Free-Range) yetiştirme sist