Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3

Effect of Osteopontin gene variants on milk production traits in Holstein Friesian crossbred cattle of Kerala

Pages
695–701
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The OPN gene polymorphism (g.8514C > T) can be suggested for marker assisted selection(MAS) for future breeding programmes for dairy cattle only after extensive association studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Osteopontin gene (OPN) is located in the quantitative trait loci (QTL) for milk production traits in bovine chromosome 6.In the present study the impact of cytosine to thymine transition in the intron-4 of OPN gene (g.8514C > T) on milk production traitswas analysed in the Holstein Friesian crossbred cattle of Kerala.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Genomic DNA was isolated and a fragment of 290 bp enclosing thepolymorphic site was amplified and genotyped by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) using endonuclease, BSeN1.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The OPN gene polymorphism (g.8514C > T) can be suggested for marker assisted selection(MAS) for future breeding programmes for dairy cattle only after extensive association studies.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Osteopontin gene (OPN) is located in the quantitative trait loci (QTL) for milk production traits in bovine chromosome 6.In the present study the impact of cytosine to thymine transition in the intron-4 of OPN gene (g.8514C > T) on milk production traitswas analysed in the Holstein Friesian crossbred cattle of Kerala. Genomic DNA was isolated and a fragment of 290 bp enclosing thepolymorphic site was amplified and genotyped by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) using endonuclease, BSeN1. Thegenetic variants were distributed according to Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The T allele was found to be the major one (T/0.76, C/0.24)and the genotype frequencies were TT/0.60, CT/0.32, and CC/0.08. The amplicons of genotypes were sequenced by sangers dideoxytermination technique and confirmed the mutation. Association study using the General Linear Model-Analysis of Variance (GLMANOVA) considering marker, season of calving, parity and herd as fixed factors and dairy trait as dependent variable revealed that noneof the yield traits (305 day milk yield, peak yield, fat yield, protein yield, solids not fat yield, lactose yield, daily milk yield) or compositiontraits (fat percent, protein percent, solids not fat percent and lactose percent) of milk production analysed were significantly differedbetween CT and TT genotyped animals. The OPN gene polymorphism (g.8514C > T) can be suggested for marker assisted selection(MAS) for future breeding programmes for dairy cattle only after extensive association studies.

🔖

Cite This Article

LALI, F. A., ANILKUMAR, K., ARAVINDAKSHAN, T. (2022). Effect of Osteopontin gene variants on milk production traits in Holstein Friesian crossbred cattle of Kerala. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3, 695–701. https://ajindex.com/articles/614687

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 2001; 157: 1819-1829
  2. Blasco A, Toro MA. A short critical history of the application of genomics to animal breeding. Livestock Science 2014; 166: 4-9
  3. Dekkers JCM. Commercial application of marker- and geneassisted selection in livestock: Strategies and lessons. Journal of Animal Science 2004; 82: 313-328
  4. Schmid M, Bennewitz J. Invited review: Genome-wide association analysis for quantitative traits in livestock–a selective review of statistical models and experimental designs. Archives Animal Breeding 2017; 60: 335-346
  5. Olsen HG, Lien S, Gautier M, Nilsen H, Roseth A et al. Mapping of a milk production quantitative trait locus to a 420-kb region on bovine chromosome 6. Genetics 2005; 169: 275-283
  6. Sodek J, Ganss B, McKee MD. Osteopontin. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine 2000; 11: 279-303
  7. Schack L, Lange A, Kelsen J, Agnholt J, Christensen B et al. Considerable variation in the concentration of osteopontin in human milk, bovine milk, and infant formulas. Journal of Dairy Science 2009; 92: 5378-5385
  8. Dudemaine PL, Thibault C, Alain K, Bissonnette N. Genetic variations in the SPP1 promoter affect gene expression and the level of osteopontin secretion into bovine milk. Animal Genetics 2014; 45: 629-640
  9. Bissonnette N. Short communication: Genetic effect of variations in the osteopontin gene (SPP1) with lactation persistency in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 2018; 101: 456-461
  10. Prokesch A, Smorlesi A, Perugini J, Manieri M, Ciarmela P et al. Molecular aspects of adipoepithelial trans-differentiation in mouse mammary gland. Stem Cells 2014; 32: 2756-2766
  11. Lali FA, Anilkumar K. Crossbreeding of cattle population in India. Journal of Indian Veterinary Association 2019; 17: 16- 24
  12. Lali FA, Bindu KA. Microsatellite BM1500 polymorphism and milk production traits in Vechur and crossbred cattle of Kerala. Veterinarski Arhiv 2011; 81: 35-42
  13. The International Committee for Animal Recording. The Global Standard for Livestock Data Procedure 2, Section 2 ICAR Guidelines for Computing Accumulated Lactation Yield. Rome, Italy: ICAR; 2020
  14. Joseph BA. Assessment and alleviation of environmental stress on productive performance of rabbits. PhD, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Pookode, India, 2011
  15. Sambrook J, Russell DW. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 3rd ed. Ne