Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 4

Effects of activated charcoal and zeolite on serum lipopolysaccharides and some inflammatory biomarkers levels in experimentally induced subacute ruminal acidosis in lambs

Pages
830–837
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion the oral consumption of activated charcoal and zeolite in the lambs with SARA resulted in a significant reduction in serum LPS values during SARA.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS) play a key role in the pathogenesis of subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Fifteen lambs were randomly assigned to 3 groups, each containing 5 lambs: control, activated charcoal, and zeolite.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion the oral consumption of activated charcoal and zeolite in the lambs with SARA resulted in a significant reduction in serum LPS values during SARA.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS) play a key role in the pathogenesis of subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA). Limited attempts have been made to inhibit LPS absorption during SARA. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impacts of oral usage of activated charcoal and zeolite on serum LPS and acute phase proteins (APPs) levels in lambs with SARA. Fifteen lambs were randomly assigned to 3 groups, each containing 5 lambs: control, activated charcoal, and zeolite. In all groups, SARA was induced for 7 days through increasing the crushed corn ration to 52.8% and reducing the rumen pH to the range of 5.7–5.6. In the control group, no additive was added to the ration while the other 2 groups received 1 gr/kg BW activated charcoal and 1 gr/kg BW zeolite daily, respectively. Immediately prior to induction (0 day) and during SARA, blood samples were taken to analyze the lactate, bicarbonate, LPS, and APPs values. During SARA, activated charcoal and zeolite groups showed significant decreasing trends in serum LPS levels (P ˂ 0.01). However, no significant changes were observed in serum CRP value in all SARA groups (P > 0.05). Moreover, plasma fibrinogen level significantly increased on days 1, 2, and 3 of SARA compared to day 0 in all groups (P < 0.01). In conclusion the oral consumption of activated charcoal and zeolite in the lambs with SARA resulted in a significant reduction in serum LPS values during SARA. Factors other than LPS might play a role in inducing inflammatory responses.

🔖

Cite This Article

NIKVAND, A. A., NOUR, M., JALALI, M. R., AZADBAKHT, M. R. T. (2022). Effects of activated charcoal and zeolite on serum lipopolysaccharides and some inflammatory biomarkers levels in experimentally induced subacute ruminal acidosis in lambs. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 4, 830–837. https://ajindex.com/articles/614666

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bramley E, Lean IJ, Fulkerson WJ, Stevenson MA, Rabiee AR et al. The definition of acidosis in dairy herds predominantly fed on pasture and concentrates. Journal of Dairy Science 2008; 91 (1): 308-21
  2. Kleen JL, Hooijer GA, Rehage J, Noordhuizen JPTM. Subacute ruminal acidosis in Dutch dairy herds. Veterinary Record 2009; 164 (22): 618-684
  3. Plaizier JC, Li S, Tun HM, Khafipour E. Nutritional models of experimentally-induced subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) differ in their impact on rumen and hindgut bacterial communities in dairy cows. Frontiers in Microbiology 2017; 7: 21-28
  4. Constable PD, Hinchcliff KW, Done SH, Grunberg W. Veterinary Medicine, a text book of the disease of cattle, sheep, pigs and horses. 11th ed. London, UK: W.B. Saunders; 2017
  5. Plaizier JC, Krause DO, Gozho GN, McBride BW. Subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows: the physiological causes, incidence and consequences. Veterinary Journal 2008; 176 (1): 21-31
  6. Kleen JL, Cannizzo C. Incidence, prevalence and impact of SARA in dairy herds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 2012; 172 (1-2): 4-8
  7. Olson JD. The relationship between nutrition and management to lameness in dairy cattle. Bovine Practitioner 1997; 31: 65-68
  8. Gozho GN, Krause DO, Plaizier JC. Rumen lipopolysaccharide and inflammation during grain adaptation and subacute ruminal acidosis in steers. Journal of Dairy Science 2006; 89 (11): 4404-4413
  9. Li S, Gozho GN, Gakhar N, Khafipour E, Krause DO et al. Evaluation of diagnostic measures for subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 2012; 92 (3): 353-364
  10. Morgante M, Gianesella M, Casella S, Ravarotto L, Stelletta C et al. Blood gas analyses, ruminal and blood pH, urine and fecal pH in dairy cows during subacute ruminal acidosis. Comparative Clinical Pathology 2009; 18 (3): 229-232
  11. Sharma R, Munns K, John SJ, Penner G, Oba M et al. Commensal fecal Escherichia coli diversity in dairy cows at high and low risk for incurring subacute ruminal acidosis. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 2009; 6 (8): 973-980
  12. Plaizier JC, Khafipour E, Li S, Gozho GN, Krause DO. Subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA), endotoxins and health consequences. Animal Feed Science and Technology 2012; 172 (1-2): 9-21
  13. Pulina G. Dairy sheep nutrition. King’s Lynn, UK: CAB, Biddles Ltd; 2004. pp. 166-170
  14. Guo J, Chang G, Zhang K, Xu L, Jin D et al. Rumen-derived lipopolysaccharide provoked inflammatory injury in the liver of dairy cows fed a hig