Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 4

Some histological reveals on reproduction of one of the lessepsian species, Nemipterus randalli in Antalya (Turkey)

Pages
621–631
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to this data, N. randalli may be described to have a Batch spawner characteristic.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the reproduction of Nemipterus randalli, one of the lessepsian fish catch from the Gulf of Antalya, Turkey was interpreted histologically.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Regarding the fish used in this study (N = 1715), it is noteworthy to mention that male individuals are larger than females.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to this data, N. randalli may be described to have a Batch spawner characteristic.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the reproduction of Nemipterus randalli, one of the lessepsian fish catch from the Gulf of Antalya, Turkey was interpreted histologically. Regarding the fish used in this study (N = 1715), it is noteworthy to mention that male individuals are larger than females. The first sexual maturity in males was determined 17 cm TL and 60 g in BW, whereas 13 cm TL and 25 g BW in females. Females reached sexual maturity at age I+ and males at the age of II+. Seven different stages (O1–O7) were identified in oocyte maturation in the ovaries. The spawning time of N. randalli in the Gulf of Antalya extended from June to October (Peak on July– August), given the histological interpretation of the development in gonads and the GSI % data. According to this data, N. randalli may be described to have a Batch spawner characteristic.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZEN, M. R. (2022). Some histological reveals on reproduction of one of the lessepsian species, Nemipterus randalli in Antalya (Turkey). Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 4, 621–631. https://ajindex.com/articles/614659

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Por FD. The Canuellidae (Copepoda, Harpacticoide) in the waters around the Sinai Peninsula and the problem of “Lessepsian” Migration of this family. Israel Journal of Zoology 1969
  2. 178 2. Shakman EA. Lessepsian migrant fish species of the Coastal Water of Libya: Status, Biology, Ecology. PhD, Rostock University, Rostock, Germany, 2008. 3. Lelli S, Colloca F, Carpentieri P, Russel BC. The threadfin bream N. randalli (Perciformes: Nemipteridae) in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. Journal of Fish Biology 2008
  3. 73 (3): 740- 745 doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.01962.x 4. Golani D, Sonin O. The Japanese threadfin bream N. japonicus, a new Indo-Pacific fish in the Mediterranean Sea. Journal of Fish Biology 2006
  4. 68 (3): 940-943. doi: 10.1111/j.0022- 1112.2006.00961.x 5. Bilecenoğlu M, Russel B. Record of N. randalli Russell, 1986. (Nemipteridae) from İskenderun Bay, Turkey. Cybium 2008
  5. 32(3): 279-280. 6. Gökoğlu M, Güven O, Balcı BA, Çolak H, Golani D. First records of Nemicthyis scolopaceus and Nemipterus randalli and second record of Apterichthus caecus from Antalya Bay. Marine Biodiversity Records 2009
  6. 2 (29): 1-3. doi: 10.1017/ S175526720800033X 7. Cassel M, Mehanna M, Mateus L, Ferreira A. Gametogenesis and reproductive cycle of Melanorivulusaff punctatus (Boulenger,1985) (Cyprinodontiformes Rivulidae) in Chapoda dos Guimerães, MatoGrosso, Brasil. Neotropical Ichthyology 2013
  7. 11 (1): 179-192. 8. Lowerre-Barbieri SK, Brown-Peterson NJ, Murua H, Tomkiewicz J, Wyannski DM et al. Emerging issues and methodological advances in fisheries reproductive biology. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management and Ecosystem. Science 2011
  8. 3 (1): 32-51 doi: 10.1080/ 19425120 2011.555725 9. Fournie JW, Krol RM, Hawkins WE. Fixation of Fish Tissues. A Hartcourt Sci. and Tech. Co.UK. Academic Press
  9. Bancroft JD, Stevens A. 1996. Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. Churchill Livingstone, Medical Div. Longman Group Ltd. Edinburgh, London and New York. pp.436 11. Luna GL. 1982. Manual of histologic staining methods. American Registry of Pathology, Mc Graw-Hill Co. NewYork. 251pp. 12. Timur G, 2013. Balık Histolojisi ve Embriyolojisi. İstanbul, Turkey. Yazın Basın Matb. Tic. Ltd. Şti. (In Turkish). 13. De Vlaming V, Grossman G, Chapman F. On the use of the Gonosomatic Index. Comparative Biochemical Physiology 1982
  10. 73A (1): 31-39. 14. Brown-Peterson NJ, Wyanski DM, Saborido-Rey F, Macewichz BJ, Lowerre-Barbieri SK. A Standard Terminology for