SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1

A micromorphometric study on the common bile duct and major duodenal papilla of the domestic swine

Ivaylo STEFANOV
Pages
113–125
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that significant age-dependent differences in the studied parameters exist.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract: The aim of the current study was to perform a comparative micromorphometric study on the thickness of mucosa, fibromuscular layer, glandular zone, serosa, and subserous layer, as well as of the entire wall of extra- and intramural parts of the porcine common bile duct in immature and mature animals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This micromorphometric study also evaluated the height and width of the lining epithelium, glandular epithelium, and goblet cells in 2-month, 6-month, and 3-year old male pigs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that significant age-dependent differences in the studied parameters exist.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the current study was to perform a comparative micromorphometric study on the thickness of mucosa, fibromuscular layer, glandular zone, serosa, and subserous layer, as well as of the entire wall of extra- and intramural parts of the porcine common bile duct in immature and mature animals. This micromorphometric study also evaluated the height and width of the lining epithelium, glandular epithelium, and goblet cells in 2-month, 6-month, and 3-year old male pigs. It was found that significant age-dependent differences in the studied parameters exist. Some differences in the studied parameters were also detected between different parts of the common bile duct, as well as between the common bile duct and major duodenal papilla in pigs of the same age. Immunohistochemical staining with smooth muscle actin, and Van Gieson and Orcein staining were performed to distinguish the smooth muscle cells and collagenous and elastic fibers. In conclusion, age dependent differences in the studied parameters in the porcine common bile duct and major duodenal papilla were detected.Key words: Common bile duct, major duodenal papilla, morphometry, glands, goblet cells, swine

🔖

Cite This Article

STEFANOV, I. (2022). A micromorphometric study on the common bile duct and major duodenal papilla of the domestic swine. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1, 113–125. https://ajindex.com/articles/614640

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Juste C, Corring T, Le Coz Y, Gueugneau A-M, Brachet G.et al. Bile secretion in the fistulated pig: effect of the method used for bile reinfusion. Reproduction Nutrition Development 1983; 23 (4): 765-773
  2. Park P, Bergstro¨m M, Ikeda K, Fritscher-Ravens A, Swain P. Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis (videos). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2005; 61(4):601-606
  3. Gulubova M, Vlaykova T, Manolova I, Hadjipetkov P, Popkharitov A. Implication of adhesionmolecules in inflammation of the common bile duct in patients with secondary cholangitis dueto biliary obstruction. HepatoGastroenterology 2008; 55:840-845
  4. Burden VG. Observations on the histologic and pathologic anatomy of the hepatic, cystic, and common bile ducts. Annals of Surgery, 1925; 82 (4): 584-597 5. Behar J, Corazziari E, Guelrud M, Hogan W, Sherman S et al. Functional gallbladder and sphincter of Oddi disorders. Gastroenterology 2006; 130(5): 1498-1509
  5. Cicala M, Habib FI, Vavassori P, PallottaN, Schillaci O et al. Outcome of endoscopic sphincterotomy in post cholecystectomy patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction as predicted by manometry and quantitative choledochoscintigraphy. Gut 2002; 50(5): 665-668
  6. Geenen JE, Hogan WJ, Dodds WJ, Toouli J, Venu RP. The efficacy of endoscopic sphingerotomy after cholecystectomy in patients with sphincter-of-Oddi dysfunction. New England Journal of Medicine 1989; 320(2): 82-87
  7. Zhang H, Tong, S.Zhang J, Zhang J, Wang H. Laparoscopic cholecystostomy in pigs: technique and comparison with traditional open cholecystostomy for surgical stress. Israel Journal of Veterinary Medicine 2016; 71 (2): 10-18
  8. Lee DK, HS Kim, Kim K-S, Lee WJ, Kim HK.et al. The effect on porcine bile duct of a metallic stent covered with a paclitaxelincorporated membrane. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2005; 61(2):296-301
  9. Ryan JP. Motility of the gall bladder and biliary tree. In: Johnson, L. R. (editor). Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract. New York, USA: Raven Press 1981; 473-494
  10. Baumgarten HG, Lange W. Extrinsic adrenergic innervation of the extrahepatic biliary duct system in guinea-pigs, cats and rhesus monkeys. Zeitschrift fÜr Zellforschung und MikroskopischeAnatomie1969; 100: 606-615
  11. Kyösola K. Structure and innervation of the choledochoduodenal junction. Annales Chirurgiaeet Gynaecologiae 1976; Suppl. 192: 1-135
  12. Onda M, Miyazaki T. The adrenergic and cholinergic innervat