Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1

Effect of light sources on productivity, welfare aspects, and economic evaluation of commercial layers

Pages
176–190
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The present findings suggested that productive parameters and reproductive traits, welfare aspects, hormonal profile as well as overall economics of layer production varied significantly based on light sources, and LEDs positively exceeded the fluorescent as well as incandescent light sources.Key words: Light sources, productive performance, egg quality, hormonal profile, welfare aspects

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract: The present study was aimed to evaluate the influence of incandescent, fluorescent, and light emitting diode (LED) lights on the productive efficiency and economic aspects of laying hens.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this, 216 laying hens were distributed into three groups of light sources with six replicates each.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The present findings suggested that productive parameters and reproductive traits, welfare aspects, hormonal profile as well as overall economics of layer production varied significantly based on light sources, and LEDs positively exceeded the fluorescent as well as incandescent light sources.Key words: Light sources, productive performance, egg quality, hormonal profile, welfare aspects
🔬Design:Experimental Field Trial
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Abstract: The present study was aimed to evaluate the influence of incandescent, fluorescent, and light emitting diode (LED) lights on the productive efficiency and economic aspects of laying hens. For this, 216 laying hens were distributed into three groups of light sources with six replicates each. Each replicate consisted of 12 birds. The data were analyzed in SAS 9.1 (SAS InstituteInc., Cary, NC, USA) by applying one-way ANOVA technique, and significant means were compared through least significant difference test. In the present study, LED light significantly improved the body weight, body weight gain, percentage of egg production, FCR per dozen and FCR per kg egg mass. All parameters for egg quality (excluding egg yolk index and Haugh unit) and egg geometry (including egg shape index, egg surface and volume) were affected by light sources at 24th week, while significant effects were recorded at egg quality (excluding egg Haugh unit and yolk index) and egg geometry (excluding egg volume) at 32nd weeks. Physiological norms (except heartbeat) and welfare aspects (except footpad score) were not affected by light sources; however, footpad score at 32nd week and heartbeat at 17th and 32nd week were significantly better in the pullets under LED lights. Reproductive hormones and metabolic enzymes (T3, T4, GnRH, LH, FSH, and cortisol including catalase enzyme) were significantly better in the birds kept under LED light at the 20th and 32nd weeks. The present findings suggested that productive parameters and reproductive traits, welfare aspects, hormonal profile as well as overall economics of layer production varied significantly based on light sources, and LEDs positively exceeded the fluorescent as well as incandescent light sources.Key words: Light sources, productive performance, egg quality, hormonal profile, welfare aspects

🔖

Cite This Article

JAVED, K., MAHMUD, A., HUSSAIN, J., RAZIQ, F. (2022). Effect of light sources on productivity, welfare aspects, and economic evaluation of commercial layers. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1, 176–190. https://ajindex.com/articles/614636

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Firouzi S, Haghbin NH, Habibi H, Jalali SS, Nabizadeh Y et al. Effects of color lights on performance, immune response and hematological indices of broilers. Journal of World’s Poultry Research 2014; 4 (2): 52-55
  2. Kim CN, Lee SR, Lee SJ. Effects of light color on energy expenditure and behavior in broiler chickens. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 2014; 27 (7): 1044- 1049. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2012.12425
  3. Khalil HA. Productive and physiological responses of Japanese quail embryos to light regime during i n c u b a t i o n period. Slovak Journal of Animal Science 2009; 42 (2): 79-86
  4. Jácome IMDT, Borilla R, Rossi LA. Influence of artificial lighting on the performance and egg quality of commercial layers: A review. Brazilian Journal Poultry Science 2014; 16 (4): 337-344. doi: 10.1590/1516-635X1604337-334
  5. Kristensen HH, Prescott NB, Perry GC, Ladewig J, Ersbøll AK et al. The behavior of broiler chickens in different light sources and illuminances. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2007; 103(1-2):75-89. doi: 10.1016/j.applamin.2006.04.017
  6. Schernhammer ES, Kroenke CH, Dowsett M. Urinary 6-sulfatoxymelatonin levels and their correlation with life style factors and steroid hormone levels. Journal of Pineal Research 2006; 40: 116-124. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-079X.2005.00285.x
  7. Long H, Zhao Y, Xin H, Hansen H, Ning Z, et al. Effect of lightemitting diode (LED) vs. Fluorescent (FL) lighting on laying hens in aviary hen houses: Part 2- Egg quality, shelf life and lipid composition. Poultry Science 2016b; 95 (1): 115-124. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev306
  8. Archer GS. Comparison of incandescent, CFL, LED and bird level LED lighting. Growth, fear and stress. International Journal of Poultry Science 2015; 14 (8): 449-455
  9. Kamanli S, Durmus I, Demir S, Tarim B. Effect of different light sources on performance and egg quality traits in laying hens. European Poultry Science 2015; 79: 1-7. doi: 10.1399/ eps.2015.109
  10. Liu K, Xin H, Sekhon J, Wang T. Effect of fluorescent vs. poultry-specific light-emitting diode lights on production performance and egg quality of W-36 laying hens. Poultry Science 2018; 97 (3): 834-844. doi: 10.3382/ps/pex371
  11. Ahmed SF, El-Hammady HY, Farghly MFA, Madian AH. Impact of some light sources on growth performance and sexual maturity of female Japanese quail. Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2015; 46 (2): 135-147. doi: 10.21608/ ajas.2015.564
  12. Son J, Park J, Kang D, Belal SA, Cha J et al. Effects of white,