Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 5

Quality and fertility of extended boar semen after prolonged transport

Pages
920–929
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Fertility of sows was affected by semen quality in terms of concentration and sperm motility parameters, as well as ratio of live sperm cells population with damaged acrosome.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to analyse semen quality parameters of fresh-extended porcine semen imported from Denmark through prolonged importing regulations and transport and to analyse fertility performance in sows inseminated four days post semen collection.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Semen was analysed immediately upon the arrival (4 days post collection) using computer-assisted sperm analyses (CASA), cytomorphology and flow cytometry, and sows were inseminated later the same day.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Fertility of sows was affected by semen quality in terms of concentration and sperm motility parameters, as well as ratio of live sperm cells population with damaged acrosome.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyse semen quality parameters of fresh-extended porcine semen imported from Denmark through prolonged importing regulations and transport and to analyse fertility performance in sows inseminated four days post semen collection. Semen was analysed immediately upon the arrival (4 days post collection) using computer-assisted sperm analyses (CASA), cytomorphology and flow cytometry, and sows were inseminated later the same day. The mean sperm concentration was 1718.09 ± 100.11 × 106 , with average of 1193.40 ± 90.58 × 106 motile cells (69%) and 756.04 ± 70.57 × 106 progressive motile spermatozoa (43.58%) in a dose, which was almost twice lower in value than producer certified-declared number of 2 billion of motile cells. Acrosome and sperm membrane integrity test indicated high percentage of total damaged acrosome. Mean values of semen samples analysed by sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) showed relatively high degree of chromatin damage. Membrane permeability test showed high percentage of sperm with damaged membrane. Prolonged transport negatively affected the sperm quality in terms of both motility and chromatin structure stability. Fertility of sows was affected by semen quality in terms of concentration and sperm motility parameters, as well as ratio of live sperm cells population with damaged acrosome.

🔖

Cite This Article

BARNA, T., MAŠIĆ, A., PAVLOVIĆ, M., MAKSIMOVIĆ, N., LAZAREVIĆ, M., APIĆ, J., MILOVANOVIĆ, A. (2022). Quality and fertility of extended boar semen after prolonged transport. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 5, 920–929. https://ajindex.com/articles/614595

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Avakumović Đ, Primena savremenih naučnih i praktičnih dostignuća u zdravstvenoj zaštiti i reprodukciji svinja. 6th ed. Srbija: Sd Publik; 2006. (In Serbian
  2. Gerrits R, Lunney J, Pursel V, Kraeling R, Gary R et al. Perspectives for artificial insemination and genomics to improve global swine populations. Theriogenology 2005; 63 (2): 283-299
  3. Gadea J. Review: Semen extenders used in the artificial insemination of swine. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 2003; 1 (2): 17-27
  4. Boe-Hansen GB, Christensen P, Vibjerg D. Sperm chromatin structure integrity in liquid stored boar semen and its relationships with field fertility. Theriogenology 2008; 69: 728- 736
  5. Milovanović A, Barna T, Vasiljević T, Milanov D, Bošković N. Boar import - semen quality control and complaint. In: Proceedings of X Symposium on Health Care, Selection and Reproduction of Pigs; Srebrno jezero, Republic of Sebia; 2012. pp. 79-87 (In Serbian with an abstract in English)
  6. Hossain MS, Johannisson A, Wallgren M, Nagy S, Siqueira AP et al. Flow cytometry for the assessment of animal sperm integrity and functionality: state of the art. Asian Journal of Andrology 2011; 13 (3): 406-419
  7. Evenson DP, Larson KL, Jost LK. Sperm chromatin structure assay: its clinical use for detecting sperm DNA fragmentation in male infertility and comparisons with other techniques. Journal of Andrology 2002; 23 (1): 25-43
  8. Tsakmakidis IA, Lymberopoulos AG, Khalifa TAA. Relationship between sperm quality traits and field-fertility of porcine semen. Journal of Veterinary Science 2010; 11 (2): 151-154. 24
  9. Björndahl L, Söderlund I, Kvist U. Evaluation of the one-step eosin-nigrosin staining technique for human sperm vitality assessment. Human Reproduction 2003; 18 (4): 813-6
  10. Graham JK, Kunze E, Hammerstedt RH. Analysis of sperm cell viability, acrosomal integrity and mitochondrial function using flow cytometry. Biology of Reproduction 1990; 43: 55-64
  11. Apić J, Milovanović A, Barna T, Jovičin M. Sperm pathological forms and acrosomal membrane integrity in boar AI dose on pig farms in AP Vojvodina (Serbia). In: Proceedings of 1st International Symposium of Veterinary Medicine “One Healt - New Challenges”; Vrdnik, Republic of Serbia; 2015; pp. 87-91 (In Serbian with an abstract in English)
  12. Gadea J. Sperm factors related to in vitro and in vivo porcine fertility. Theriogenology 2005; 63 (2): 431-444
  13. Milovanović A, Barna T, Milanov D, Lazarević M. Model for cooperation between