Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 5

Characterization and relationship between bulk tank milk composition and compost bedded variables from dairy barns in Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil

Pages
890–900
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicated a heterogeneous BTM composition and CB management among dairy farms, besides a strong relationship between the two sets of variables (1st pair, rc = 0.972; p = 0.0253).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Studies with compost bedded pack dairy barn system (CBDB) are still recent in Brazil.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data are from 8 dairy farms comprising August to October 2018, in the northwest region of Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicated a heterogeneous BTM composition and CB management among dairy farms, besides a strong relationship between the two sets of variables (1st pair, rc = 0.972; p = 0.0253).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Studies with compost bedded pack dairy barn system (CBDB) are still recent in Brazil. Thus, we used principal component and canonical correlation analysis to characterize and verify the relationship between compost bedded variables (CB) and bulk tank milk variables (BTM). Data are from 8 dairy farms comprising August to October 2018, in the northwest region of Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil. Results indicated a heterogeneous BTM composition and CB management among dairy farms, besides a strong relationship between the two sets of variables (1st pair, rc = 0.972; p = 0.0253). Linear combination of CB variables explained 31.2% of the BTM variation. Protein (– 0.53) and total bacterial count (TBC) (0.91) were the principal variables in BTM set, while compost bedded TBC (0.51), temperature at surface (– 2.28) and 20 cm depth (1.83), barn spacing per cow (– 0.53), and pH value (– 0.55) were the principal variables in CB set. A significant effect of CB management on BTM was found where bedding temperature should be the principal variable for monitoring.

🔖

Cite This Article

NOGARA, K. F., BUSANELLO, M., HAYGERT-VELHO, I. M. P., ALMEIDA, P. S. G., FRIGERI, K. D. M., ZOPOLLATTO, M. (2022). Characterization and relationship between bulk tank milk composition and compost bedded variables from dairy barns in Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 5, 890–900. https://ajindex.com/articles/614593

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Aleixo SS, Souza JG, Ferraudo AS. Multivariate analysis that can be used to determine of dairy producers homogeneous groups. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 2020; 36 (6): 2168- 2175 (in Portuguese with an abstract in English). doi: 10.1590/ S1516-35982007000900029 2. Barberg AE, Endres MI, Janni KA. Compost dairy barns in Minnesota: a descriptive study. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 2007; 23 (2): 231-238. 3. Mota VC, Damasceno FA, Soares EA, Leite DF. Fuzzy clustering methods applied to the evaluation of compost bedded pack barns. In: IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE); Naples, Italy; 2017. pp. 1-6. 4. Black RA, Taraba JL, Day GB, Damasceno FA, Newman MC et al. The relationship between compost bedded pack performance, management, and bacterial counts. Journal of Dairy Science 2014; 97 (5): 2669-2679. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013- 6779 5. Albino RL, Taraba JL, Marcondes MI, Eckelkamp EA, Bewley JM. Comparison of bacterial populations in bedding material, on teat ends, and in milk of cows housed in compost bedded pack barns. Animal Production Science 2017; 58 (9): 1686- 1691. doi: 10.1071/AN16308 6. Leso L, Barbari M, Lopes MA, Damasceno FA, Galama P et al. Invited review: Compost-bedded pack barns for dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 2020; 103 (2): 1072-1099. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16864 7. Black RA, Taraba JL, Day GB, Damasceno FA, Bewley JM. Compost bedded pack dairy barn management, performance, and producer satisfaction. Journal of Dairy Science 2013; 96 (12): 8060-8074. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-6778 8. Barberg AE, Endres MI, Salfer JA, Reneau JK. Performance and welfare of dairy cows in an alternative housing system in Minnesota. Journal of Dairy Science 2007; 90 (3): 1575-1583. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71643-0 9. Lobeck KM, Endres MI, Shane EM, Godden SM, Fetrow J. Animal welfare in cross-ventilated, compost-bedded pack, and naturally ventilated dairy barns in the upper Midwest. Journal of Dairy Science 2011; 94 (11): 5469-5479. doi: 10.3168/ jds.2011-4363 10. Van Gastelen S, Westerlaan B, Houwers DJ, Van Eerdenburg FJCM. A study on cow comfort and risk for lameness and mastitis in relation to different types of bedding materials. Journal of Dairy Science 2011; 94 (10): 4878-4888. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-4019 11. Oliveira VC, Damasceno FA, Oliveira CEA, Ferraz PFP, Ferraz GAS et al. Compost-bedded pack barns in the state of Minas Gerais: architectural and technological characterization. Agronomy Research 2019; 17 (5): 2016