Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 6

The effects of dietary fish protein hydrolysate-based supplementation on sensory properties and meat quality of broiler chicken

Pages
1041–1051
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results could be helpful in application of FPHS in the poultry farming especially in the countries looking for local feed protein products as soybean meal replacement.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of supplement fish protein hydrolysate-based to broiler feed on sensory properties and meat quality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 400 pieces of 1-day-old male broiler chicks (Ross 308) received 4 dietary levels (0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5%) of fish protein hydrolysate-based supplement (FPHS) in the basal diet mix for 42 days.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results could be helpful in application of FPHS in the poultry farming especially in the countries looking for local feed protein products as soybean meal replacement.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of supplement fish protein hydrolysate-based to broiler feed on sensory properties and meat quality. A total of 400 pieces of 1-day-old male broiler chicks (Ross 308) received 4 dietary levels (0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5%) of fish protein hydrolysate-based supplement (FPHS) in the basal diet mix for 42 days. Quality index-derived method (QIM) was used for assessment of chicken carcass. Quantitative descriptive analysis method was applied to study sensory properties of the chicken fillets. Water holding capacity (WHC), cook loss, color, meat texture were also determined. The carcass odor and flavor in broilers received 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5% FPHS were significantly different from those of control. The highest intensity of darkness, reddish pink, and yellowness of the legs and breast was observed in the carcass of control treatment. The highest fat content (1.34%) and WHC (70.36%) were reported in treatments received 7.5% FPHS. The umami taste was detected in chicken broth and cooked fillets of broilers fed received FPHS, which was not detected in the control treatment. The umami (a pleasant savory taste) was sensed more strongly in the cooked fillet followed by chicken broth. Breast fillet of birds received FPHS had a better texture, which was confirmed by shear stress measurement. The results could be helpful in application of FPHS in the poultry farming especially in the countries looking for local feed protein products as soybean meal replacement.

🔖

Cite This Article

SHAVIKLO, A. R., ALIZADEH-GHAMSARI, A. H., ETEMADIAN, Y., RAFIPOUR, F. (2022). The effects of dietary fish protein hydrolysate-based supplementation on sensory properties and meat quality of broiler chicken. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 6, 1041–1051. https://ajindex.com/articles/614590

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Haščík P, Garlík J, ElaminElimam IO, Kňazovická V, Bobko M, Kačániová M. Influence of propolis extract in Hubbard JV chickens nutrition on oxidative stability of meat. Actafytotech Zootech 2014; 17: 47-51. doi: 10.15414/afz.2014.17.02.47–51 2. Ayseli Mt, Filik G, Selli S. Evaluation of volatile compounds in chicken breast meat using simultaneous distillation and extraction with odour activity value. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research 2014; 53 (2): 137-142. 3. Iran’s Ministry of Agriculture, Deputy of Livestock Production, Animal Products Statistics, Tehran, Iran, 2021. 4. Khan S, Khan RU, Alam W, Sultan A. Evaluating the nutritive profile of three insect meals and their effects to replace soya bean in broiler diet. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 2018; 102: e662-e668. doi:10.1111/ jpn.12809 5. del Bosque CIE, Altmann BA, Ciulu M, Halle I, Jansen S et al. Meat quality parameters and sensory properties of one highperforming and two local chicken breeds fed with Vicia faba. Foods 2020; 9: 1052.doi:10.3390/foods9081052 6. Kristinsson HG, Rasco BA. Fish protein hydrolysates: production, biochemical, and functional properties. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 2000; 40: 43-81. doi:10.1080/10408690091189266 7. Siddik MAB, Howieson J, Fotedar R, Partridge GJ. Enzymatic fish protein hydrolysates in finfish aquaculture: a review. Reviews in Aquaculture 2021; 13: 406-430. doi:10.1111/ raq.12481 8. Ahuja K, Mamtani K. Fish Protein Hydrolysate Market Size. Global Market Insights, Report ID: GMI3071. Inc. USA. 2020. Accessible from https://www.gminsights.com. 9. Etemadian Y, Ghaemi V, Shaviklo AR, Pourashouri P, Sadeghi Mahoonak, A et al. Development of animal/ plant-based protein hydrolysate and its application in food, feed and nutraceutical industries: state of the art. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021; 278:123219. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123219 10. Niu J, Zhang YQ, Liu YJ, Tian LX, Lin HZ et al. Effects of graded replacement of fishmeal by fish protein hydrolysate on growth performance of early post-larval Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeusvannamei, Boone). Journal of Applied Animal Research 2014; 42: 6-15. doi:10.1080/ 09712119.2013.795897 11. Perez-Alvarez JA, Sendra-Nadal E, Sanchez-Zapata EJ, ViudaMartos, M. Poultry flavour: general aspects and applications. In: Guerrero Legarreta I, Hui YH (editors) Handbook Of Poultry Science And Technology: Secondary Processing. New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2010. 12. Tejpal CS,