Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 5

Comparative efficiency of five mathematical functions in modelling the first lactation milk yield of Kankrej cattle

Pages
825–832
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The exponential decline function was the least efficient in fitting the lactation curve in Kankrej cattle, followed by inverse polynomial function.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Modelling of first lactation milk yield of Kankrej cattle was done using five different non-linear mathematical functions viz., exponential decline function (EDF), gamma function (GF), inverse polynomial function (IPF), mixed log function (MLF) and parabolic exponential function (PEF).
📊
Key Findings & Data:We compared their efficiency in describing variations in first lactation milk yield of animals maintained under field conditions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The exponential decline function was the least efficient in fitting the lactation curve in Kankrej cattle, followed by inverse polynomial function.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Modelling of first lactation milk yield of Kankrej cattle was done using five different non-linear mathematical functions viz., exponential decline function (EDF), gamma function (GF), inverse polynomial function (IPF), mixed log function (MLF) and parabolic exponential function (PEF). We compared their efficiency in describing variations in first lactation milk yield of animals maintained under field conditions. A total of 3994 fortnightly daily milk records of 203 Kankrej cattle calved during the years between 2011 and 2017 at farmers’ herds in the Banaskantha region of Gujarat State, India were utilized for the study. The PROC NLIN procedure of Statistical Analysis Software (SAS) using Newton method of iteration was applied to generate the model parameters and corresponding standard errors. Different parameters like adjusted R2 -value, root mean square error (RMSE), Durbin–Watson (DW) statistic, Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) were used to compare the efficiency of different models. Results inferred that mixed log function was the best non-linear mathematical function for explaining variations in the first lactation milk yield of Kankrej cattle followed by gamma function and parabolic exponential function. The exponential decline function was the least efficient in fitting the lactation curve in Kankrej cattle, followed by inverse polynomial function.

🔖

Cite This Article

RAJA, T. V., RATHEE, S. K., RATHOD, B. S., PANCHASARA, H., DAS, A. K., SINGH, U., KUMAR, S. (2022). Comparative efficiency of five mathematical functions in modelling the first lactation milk yield of Kankrej cattle. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 5, 825–832. https://ajindex.com/articles/614568

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Pundir RK, Singh PK, Singh KP, Dangi PS. Factor analysis of biometric traits of Kankrej cows to explain body conformation. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 2011; 24: 449- 456
  2. Macciotta N, Vicario D, Cappio-Borlino A. Detection of different shapes of lactation curve for milk yield in dairy cattle by empirical mathematical models. Journal of Dairy Science 2005; 88: 1178-1191
  3. Rathod B S, Patel M P, Chaudhari A B, Gami Y M, Panchasara H H. Conservation and Improvement of Kankrej Cattle (Bos indicus): Status vis-à-vis strategies. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 2020; 90 (8): 102-105
  4. Brody S, Ragsdale AC, Turner CW. The rate of decline of milk secretion with the advance of the period of lactation. Journal of General Physiology 1923; 5: 441-444
  5. Sikka LC. A study of lactation as affected by heredity and environment. Journal of Dairy Research 1950; 17: 231-252
  6. Nelder JA. Inverse polynomials, a useful group of multifactor response functions. Biometrics 1966; 22: 128
  7. Wood PDP. Algebraic model of lactation curve in cattle. Nature 1967; 216: 164-165
  8. Guo Z, Swalve HH. Modelling of the lactation curve as a sub-model in the evaluation of test day records. In: Interbull Meeting Open Session Programme; Pruhonice, Prague, Czech Republic; 1995. No. 11 9. SAS Institute. Getting Started with SAS® Text Miner 4.2. 2010. 1st Edition. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc., pp 84
  9. Bangar YC, Verma MR. Non-linear modelling to describe lactation curve in Gir crossbred cows. Journal of Animal Science Technology 2017; 59: 3
  10. Zadeh GHN. Comparison of the parameters of the lactation curve between normal and difficult calving in Iranian Holstein cows. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 2019; 17 (1): e0401
  11. Boujenane I. Comparison of different lactation curve models to describe lactation curve in Moroccan Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science 2013; 3 (4): 817-822
  12. Bahashwan S. Lactation curve modelling for Dhofari cows breed. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 2018; 13: 226-231
  13. Singh U, Raja TV, Alyethodi RR, Rathod BS, Prakash B et al. Genetic improvement of Kankrej cattle through associated herd progeny testing under field and farm conditions. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 2018; 88 (3): 314-318
  14. Farhangfar H, Rowlinson P. Genetic analysis of Wood`s lactation curve for Iranian Holstein heifers. Journal of Biological Sciences 2007; 7: 127-135
  15. Rashia Banu N. Geneti