SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2

Determination of quality of working life of private veterinarians: validity and reliability study

Mustafa Agah TEKİNDAL
Gökhan ASLIM
Aşkın YAŞAR
Pages
346–353
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the data obtained from the study, it is stated that the “Quality of Working Life Scale” is reliable and valid for private veterinarians, and it can be used to determine the quality of working life of private veterinarians, as well as it is a scale that can be used to evaluate the quality of working life of veterinarians working in other fields and other professions in the field of health.Key words: Factor analysis, private veterinarian, quality, working life, scale, veterinarian

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract: With this study, it was aimed to determine the factors affecting the quality of working life of private veterinarians.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study included 367 people who work as private veterinarians in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the data obtained from the study, it is stated that the “Quality of Working Life Scale” is reliable and valid for private veterinarians, and it can be used to determine the quality of working life of private veterinarians, as well as it is a scale that can be used to evaluate the quality of working life of veterinarians working in other fields and other professions in the field of health.Key words: Factor analysis, private veterinarian, quality, working life, scale, veterinarian
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Abstract: With this study, it was aimed to determine the factors affecting the quality of working life of private veterinarians. In addition, it was aimed to develop a scale (Quality of Working Life Scale) that enables the evaluation of quality of working life of private veterinarians. The study included 367 people who work as private veterinarians in Turkey. For the structure validity, Cronbach alpha (α) coefficient was used for reliability analysis. Factor analysis was used for validity analysis. As a result of the data obtained from the study, it is stated that the “Quality of Working Life Scale” is reliable and valid for private veterinarians, and it can be used to determine the quality of working life of private veterinarians, as well as it is a scale that can be used to evaluate the quality of working life of veterinarians working in other fields and other professions in the field of health.Key words: Factor analysis, private veterinarian, quality, working life, scale, veterinarian

🔖

Cite This Article

TEKİNDAL, M. A., ASLIM, G., YAŞAR, A. (2022). Determination of quality of working life of private veterinarians: validity and reliability study. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2, 346–353. https://ajindex.com/articles/614564

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Martel JP, Dupuis G. Quality of work life: Theoretical and methodological problems, and presentation of a new model and measuring instrument. Social Indicators Research 2006
  2. doi: 10.1007/s11205-004-5368-4 2. Wyatt TA, Wah CY. Perceptions of QWL: A study of Singaporean employees development. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management 2001
  3. 9 (2): 59-76. doi: 10.1.1.730.424 3. Turkish Veterinary Medical Association (TVMA). 3rd ed. Turkish Veterinary Medicine Congress Commission Reports Book, TVMA, Ankara, Turkey
  4. 2010 (in Turkish). 4. Official Gazette. The Law Regarding Practicing The Profession of Veterinary Medicine, Organisation of Turkish Veterinary Medical Association and Chambers and Their Activities. 18 March 1954 dated and 8661 numbered
  5. 1954 (in Turkish). 5. Official Gazette. Regulation on Veterinary Clinic and Polyclinic. 05 October 2011 dated and 28085 numbered
  6. 2011 (in Turkish). 6. Turkish Veterinary Medical Association (TVMA). 4th ed. Turkish Veterinary Medicine Congress Commission Reports Book (in Turkish), TVMA, Ankara, Turkey
  7. Efraty D, Sirgy J. The effects of quality of working life (QWL) on employee behavioural responses. Social Indicator Research 1990
  8. doi: 10.1007/BF00286389 8. Aslım G. The Evaluation of the Quality of Working Life of Veterinarians in Ministry of Food Agriculture and Livestock. PhD, Selçuk University Health Sciences Institute Konya, Turkey, 2013 (in Turkish with an abstract in English). 9. Özaslan G. Evaluation of the Quality of Working Life of Research Assistants. PhD, Selçuk University, Institute of Education Sciences, Department of Educational Sciences, Konya, Turkey, 2010 (in Turkish with an abstract in English). 10. Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for testing and estimating coefficient alpha. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 2002
  9. doi: 10.3102/10769986027004335 11. Feldt, LS, Woodruff DJ, Salih FA. Statistical inference for coefficient alpha. Applied Psychological Measurement 1987
  10. doi: 10.1177/014662168701100107 12. Walton RE. Quality of working life: What is it? Sloan Management Review 1973
  11. doi: 10.12691/ education-4-20-3 13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ 1997
  12. 314 (7080): 572. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572 14. Allen MJ, Yen WM. Introduction to measurement theory. IL, USA: Waveland Press, Long Grove
  13. Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for comparing two alpha reliability co