Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2

Effects of age and body region on wool characteristics of Merino sheep crossbreds in Turkey

Pages
235–247
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, all three crossbreds were suggested to be considered for the development of new agricultural policies and increasing breeder’s awareness to reintroduce these crossbreds in the textile industry.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim of this study was to comparatively investigate the wool characteristics of Central Anatolian Merino, Karacabey Merino and Ramlıç sheep, which are common crossbred sheep breeds in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 360 wool samples were equally collected from the shoulder, rib, and rump of each lamb (3–6 months-age), yearlings (1–1.5-year age), primiparous ewes (2–2.5-year age) and multiparous ewes (3–3.5-year age) were used for analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, all three crossbreds were suggested to be considered for the development of new agricultural policies and increasing breeder’s awareness to reintroduce these crossbreds in the textile industry.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim of this study was to comparatively investigate the wool characteristics of Central Anatolian Merino, Karacabey Merino and Ramlıç sheep, which are common crossbred sheep breeds in Turkey. A total of 360 wool samples were equally collected from the shoulder, rib, and rump of each lamb (3–6 months-age), yearlings (1–1.5-year age), primiparous ewes (2–2.5-year age) and multiparous ewes (3–3.5-year age) were used for analysis. Each sample was analyzed to determine fibre diameter, length, clean fleece yield, elasticity, and strength. Also, live weight after shearing and greasy fleece weights were recorded for each animal. Statistical analysis of this study was performed using SPSS software. Normality hypothesis tested using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Homogeneity of the variance for each trait was tested with the Levene’s test. Descriptive statistics of the traits were given as mean ± standard error. Observed means for greasy fleece weight were 3.6 ± 0.09 kg, 2.5 ± 0.09 kg, and 2.2 ± 0.08 kg for Karacabey Merino, Central Anatolian Merino and Ramlıç sheep, respectively. Average diameter, length, clean fleece yield, elasticity, and strength measurements of Karacabey Merino were 23.9 ± 0.11 µ, 59.2 ± 0.64 mm, 56.2 ± 0.35%, 20.2 ± 0.23 cN / tex, and 12.6 ± 0.09 cN / tex, whereas 24.7 ± 0.12 µ, 50.6 ± 0.71 mm, 55.2 ± 0.60%, 21.6 ± 0.23 cN / tex, 13.8 ± 0.14 cN / tex in Central Anatolian Merino and 24.1 ± 0.12 µ, 53.2 ± 1.05 mm, 62.9 ± 0.53%, 22.3 ± 0.26 cN / tex, 13.4 ± 0.12 cN / tex were observed in Ramlıç sheep, respectively. This study suggests that observed wool characteristics for each of three crossbreds were within the standard range of the textile industry. Therefore, all three crossbreds were suggested to be considered for the development of new agricultural policies and increasing breeder’s awareness to reintroduce these crossbreds in the textile industry.

🔖

Cite This Article

BEHREM, S., GÜL, S. (2022). Effects of age and body region on wool characteristics of Merino sheep crossbreds in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2, 235–247. https://ajindex.com/articles/614553

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Anonymous 2020. IWTO Specifications for Wool Sheep Welfare. International Wool Textile Organisation (IWTO), Rue de l’Industrie, 4 Brussels, 1000, Belgium
  2. Sönmez R, Kaymakçı M, Eliçin A, Tuncel E, Wassmuth R et al. Improvement studies in Turkey sheep husbandry. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Uludag University 2009; 23 (2): 43-65. (in Turkish with an abstract in English)
  3. TUİK (Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu), Hayvansal üretim istatistikleri, 2019. Erişim tarihi 5 Mayıs
  4. Yalçın BC, Müftüoğlu S, Yurtçu B. Possibilities of improving important production characteristics of Konya Merino sheep through selection. I. performance levels for different characteristics. Journal of Ankara University Veterinary Faculty 1972; 19 (1-2): 227-255. (in Turkish with an abstract in English)
  5. Akçapınar H. Alman Et Merinosu ve Karacabey Merinoslarının canlı ağırlık, beden yapısı ve yapağı verimi yönünden karşılaştırılması. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 1983; 30 (11): 201-205
  6. Demir H. Ramlıç ve Dağlıç koyunlarının melezlenmesi ile elde edilen çeşitli genotiplerin karşılaştırılması. İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 1995; 21 (1): 131-141
  7. Koyuncu M, Tuncel E, Ferik A. Anadolu Merinosu, Kıvırcık, Türkgeldi koyunlarının yapağı verim ve özellikleri üzerine bir araştırma. Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 1996; 12: 101-108
  8. Dellal G, Söylemezoğlu F, Etikan S, Erdoğan Z. A Research on some wool characteristics of Anatolian merino ewes. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 2000; 6 (2): 48-53. (in Turkish with an abstract in English)
  9. Yıldız N, Denk H. Some of production traits of Akkaraman ewes raised by farmers in Van region II. fleece yield, fleece length, body measurements, birth weights of lambs and lamb survival. Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2006; 20 (1): 29-37. (in Turkish with an abstract in English)
  10. Uzun Kara HŞ. Türkiye yerli koyun ırkları ile bazı melez koyun genotiplerinin yapağı özellikleri ve yapağının sanayide kullanılabilirliği üzerine bir araştırma. Doktora Tezi, Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Zootekni Anabilim Dalı, Bursa, Türkiye, 2008
  11. Peşmen G, Yardımcı M. Menemen koyununa ait yapağı özellikleri: I. Morfolojik ve fiziksel özellikler. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences 2012; 28 (2): 99-105
  12. Tuncer SS. Sireli HD, Dellal G. Comparative analysis of various fleece characteristics of Norduz and Zom sheep. Journal of Animal and Plant Science 2017; 27: 763-770
  13. Bağkes