Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1

Effect of age, stocking density, genotype, and cage tier on feather score of layer pure lines

Pages
115–123
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that age, stocking density, cage tiers, and genotypes have a significant effect on the feather score of the head, neck, breast, back, wings, and tail; feather score significantly decreased at an increasing age and stocking density (p < 0.01).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of the study was to investigate the effect of genotype, age, stocking density, and cage tier on the feather score of egg-laying pure lines.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The trial was carried out with five white (BLACK, BLUE, MARON, BROWN, and D229) and six brown (RIR1, RIR2, BAR1, BAR2, COL, and LINE54) eggshell lines as classified by the Ankara poultry research institute.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that age, stocking density, cage tiers, and genotypes have a significant effect on the feather score of the head, neck, breast, back, wings, and tail; feather score significantly decreased at an increasing age and stocking density (p < 0.01).
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The objective of the study was to investigate the effect of genotype, age, stocking density, and cage tier on the feather score of egg-laying pure lines. The trial was carried out with five white (BLACK, BLUE, MARON, BROWN, and D229) and six brown (RIR1, RIR2, BAR1, BAR2, COL, and LINE54) eggshell lines as classified by the Ankara poultry research institute. In the experiment, 162 chicks were randomly selected from each of the 11 lines; thus, a total of 1782 chicks (810 and 972 white and brown layer pure lines, respectively). At 17 weeks of age, pullets were chosen at random and placed in 3- tiered battery-type cages. Each tier housed 99 chickens (11 lines, 3 different stocking densities, 3 replications). The stocking density was 5 birds, 6 birds, and 7 birds per cage cell that corresponded to 720 cm2 , 600 cm2 , and 514.28 cm2 of floor space per bird, respectively. Feeding was ad libitum during the growth and egg production periods. Feather scores of the head, neck, breast, back, wings, and tail regions of the chickens were taken at the 30th, 40th, 50th, and 60thweek of age. The results indicated that age, stocking density, cage tiers, and genotypes have a significant effect on the feather score of the head, neck, breast, back, wings, and tail; feather score significantly decreased at an increasing age and stocking density (p < 0.01). It was observed that the feather score of the chickens on the top tier was significantly increased (p < 0.01). It was found that RIR2, BLACK, and COL pure lines had the best feather score. These findings suggest that chickens placed in top cage tiers with low stocking density (5 chickens/ cage cell) and RIR2, BLACK and COL pure line genotypes improve feather score.

🔖

Cite This Article

DUMAN, M., TOK, S., TAINIKA, B., ŞEKEROĞLU, A. (2022). Effect of age, stocking density, genotype, and cage tier on feather score of layer pure lines. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1, 115–123. https://ajindex.com/articles/614519

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Scherer LA, Verburg PH, Schulp CJ. Opportunities for sustainable intensification in European agriculture. Global Environmental Change 2018
  2. doi: 10.1016/j. gloenvcha.2017.11.009 2. Mottet A, Tempio G. Global poultry production: current state and future outlook and challenges. World’s Poultry Science Journal 2017
  3. 73 (2): 245-256. doi: 10.1017/S0043933917000071 3. Stratmann A, Fröhlich EK, Gebhardt-Henrich SG, HarlanderMatauschek A, Würbel H, et al. Genetic selection to increase bone strength affects prevalence of keel bone damage and egg parameters in commercially housed laying hens. Poultry Science 2016
  4. 95 (5): 975-984. doi: 10.3382/ps/pew026 4. Preisinger R. Innovative layer genetics to handle global challenges in egg production. British poultry science 2018
  5. 59 (1): 1-6. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2018.1401828 5. Liu Z, Yang N, Yan Y, Li G, Liu A, et al. Genome-wide association analysis of egg production performance in chickens across the whole laying period. BMC genetics 2019
  6. 20 (1): 67. doi: 10.1186/s12863-019-0771-7. 6. Karaman S, Sekeroglu A, Duman M. Physical characteristics and performance of Laying hens caged in different tiers and environmental parameters of each tier. Transactions of the ASABE 2013
  7. 56 (1):321-328. doi: 10.13031/2013.42588 7. Şekeroğlu A, Duman M, Tahtalı Y, Yıldırım A, Eleroğlu H. Effect of cage tier and age on performance, egg quality and stress parameters of laying hens. South African Journal of Animal Science 2014
  8. 44 (3): 288-297. doi: 10.4314/sajas.v44i3.11 8. Tünaydın G, Yilmaz Dikmen B. Impact of light-emitting diode and compact fluorescent light source type and cage tier on layers reared in an enriched cage system Part 1: Production performance and egg quality. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 2019
  9. 43 (5): 615-626. doi: 10.3906/vet-1903- 74 9. Weimer SL, Robison CI, Tempelman RJ, Jones DR, Karcher DM. Laying hen production and welfare in enriched colony cages at different stocking densities. Poultry Science 2019
  10. 98 (9): 3578-8356. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez107. 10. Jensen L. The effects of stocking density on the growth, behaviour, and welfare of layer pullets in two cage systems. MSc, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada, 2019. 11. Widowski TM, Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL, Rault JL. Laying hen welfare I. Social environment and space. World’s Poultry Science Journal 2016
  11. 72 (2): 333-342. doi: 10.1017/S0043933916000027 12. Benyi K, Norris D, Tsatsinyane PM. Effects of stocking density and group si