Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2

Dental morphometric investigation on the chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera) using a threedimensional reconstruction model

Pages
254–262
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is considered that the results of the study can contribute to anatomical and clinical research, as well as studies and applications in the field of veterinary dentistry.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to reveal the morphometric characteristics of the teeth of the chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera), which are both kept as pet animals and raised for the economic value of their fur, using three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions created from two-dimensional (2D) multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) images and to investigate whether there was a difference between the sexes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 12 chinchillas of both sexes (six males and six females) were used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is considered that the results of the study can contribute to anatomical and clinical research, as well as studies and applications in the field of veterinary dentistry.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to reveal the morphometric characteristics of the teeth of the chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera), which are both kept as pet animals and raised for the economic value of their fur, using three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions created from two-dimensional (2D) multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) images and to investigate whether there was a difference between the sexes. A total of 12 chinchillas of both sexes (six males and six females) were used. The teeth reconstructions of the animals were performed with Mimics. 14.1 3D modeling software on the 2D images was taken in the prone position. According to the statistical results of the linear measurement, surface area, and volume values of the teeth obtained from the created model, sexual dimorphism was detected in all the teeth of the chinchilla. It was observed that the mandibular incisors were larger than the maxillary incisors, and the largest maxillary molar was M1 and the largest mandibular was M2. It is considered that the results of the study can contribute to anatomical and clinical research, as well as studies and applications in the field of veterinary dentistry.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKADİF, S., HALIGÜR, A., EKEN, E. (2022). Dental morphometric investigation on the chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera) using a threedimensional reconstruction model. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2, 254–262. https://ajindex.com/articles/614508

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Mohsenpour K, Gangadhar MR, Samehsalari S. Mandibular and maxillary canine as a tool for sex determination. Journal of Morphological Sciences 2017
  2. 34 (4): 247-250. doi: 10.4322/ jms.114217 2. Millien V, Bovy H. When teeth and bones disagree: body mass estimation of a giant extinct rodent. Journal of Mammalogy 2010
  3. 91 (1): 11-18. doi: 10.1644/08-MAMM-A-347R1.1 3. Gonzalez VT, Ojeda FO, Fonseca GM, Garcia-Ruiz C, Caceres PN et al. A morphological and morphometric dental analysis as a forensic tool to identify the Iberian wolf (Canis lupus signatus). Animals 2020
  4. 10 (6): 975-995. doi: 10.3390/ ani10060975 4. Sang YH, Hu HC, Lu SH, Wu YW, Li WR et al. Accuracy assessment of three-dimensional surface reconstructions of in vivo teeth from cone-beam computed tomography. Chinese Medical Journal 2016
  5. 129 (12): 1464-1470. doi: 10.4103/0366- 6999.183430 5. Sherwood IA, Gutmann JL, Unnikrishnan M. Threedimensional reconstruction and measurement for endodontic assessment of complex root morphologies with an application framework for cone-beam computed tomography images. Dentistry 2020
  6. 10 (564): 1-4. doi: 10.35248/2161- 1122.20.10.564 6. Buchaillard S, Ong SH, Payan Y, Foong K. Reconstruction of 3D tooth images. HAL 2004
  7. hal-00108684. 7. Kupczik KF. Tooth root morphology in primates and carnivores. University College London, United States, 2003. 8. Mancinelli E, Capello V. Anatomy and disorders of the oral cavity of rat-like and quirrel-like rodents. The Veterinary Clinics of North America 2016
  8. doi: 10.1016/j. cvex.2016.04.008 9. Lüps P, Roper TJ. Tooth size in the European badger (Meles meles) with special reference to sexual dimorphism, diet and intraspecific aggression. Acta Theriologica 1988
  9. 33 (2): 21-33. doi: 10.4098/AT.arch.88-2 10. Oishi T, Uraguchi K, Abramov AV, Masuda R. Geographical variations of the skull in the red fox Vulpes vulpes on the Japanese islands: An exception tobergmann’s rule. Zoological Science 2010
  10. 27 (12): 939-945. doi: 10.2108/zsj.27.939. 11. Munkhzul T, Reading RP, Buuveibaatar B, Murdoch JD. Comparative craniometric measurements of two sympatric species of Vulpes in Ikh Nart Nature Reserve, Mongolia. Mongolian Journal of Biological Sciences 2018
  11. 16 (1): 1-10. doi: 10.22353/mjbs.2018.16.03 12. Curth S, Fischer MS, Kupezik K. Patterns of integration in the canine skull: an inside view into the relationship of the skull modules of domestic dogs and wolves. Zoology 2017
  12. doi: 10.1016/j.zool.2017.