Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 3

Forage turnip (Brassica rapa) harvested in different phases of vegetative stage and ensiled with the additives of molasses and barley and the effects of additives on silage quality, in vitro digestibility, and energy content

Pages
475–482
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, in parallel with the progression of the vegetative stage, the DMD, OMD, DE, ME, and NEL values of the silages decreased, increasing with the addition of the additives, and the obtained silages were of high-quality as alternative quality roughage in ruminant feeding.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to determine the silage quality, in vitro digestibility and energy content of forage turnip (Brassica rapa) ensiled with molasses or ground barley.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Forage turnip was harvested at three different stages: the beginning, middle and end of the flowering period, and it was ensiled with no additive (control), 5% molasses or 4% ground barley.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, in parallel with the progression of the vegetative stage, the DMD, OMD, DE, ME, and NEL values of the silages decreased, increasing with the addition of the additives, and the obtained silages were of high-quality as alternative quality roughage in ruminant feeding.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the silage quality, in vitro digestibility and energy content of forage turnip (Brassica rapa) ensiled with molasses or ground barley. Forage turnip was harvested at three different stages: the beginning, middle and end of the flowering period, and it was ensiled with no additive (control), 5% molasses or 4% ground barley. In the trial, pH, nutrient contents, ammonia nitrogen (NH3 -N) contents, volatile fatty acid (VFA) contents, Fleig scores, in vitro digestibility and energy content were determined. It was observed that the effect of the vegetative stage on the difference between the groups was significant (p < 0.05). Accordingly, with the progression of the vegetative stage, the contents of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), ether extract (EE), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) showed an increase while a decrease was observed in crude protein (CP). The effects of the additives on the difference between the groups were found to be significant except for the CP parameter (p < 0.05). Molasses and barley addition to the silages increased DM, OM and EE contents and reduced the levels of NDF and ADF. With the progression of the vegetative stage, lactic acid (LA) and acetic acid (AA) values decreased while pH values and Fleig scores increased. The effects of additives were found to be insignificant for all parameters except for AA and Fleig scores. As the vegetative stage progressed, the dry matter digestibility (DMD), organic matter digestibility (OMD), digestible energy (DE), metabolic energy (ME) and net energy for lactation (NEL ) values of the silages decreased significantly (p < 0.05). The addition of molasses or barley, compared to the control, resulted in a significant increase in the levels of DMD, OMD, DE, ME, and NEL (p < 0.05). In conclusion, in parallel with the progression of the vegetative stage, the DMD, OMD, DE, ME, and NEL values of the silages decreased, increasing with the addition of the additives, and the obtained silages were of high-quality as alternative quality roughage in ruminant feeding.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, S., KALE, Ç., DENİZ, S., ÖZKAN, F. (2022). Forage turnip (Brassica rapa) harvested in different phases of vegetative stage and ensiled with the additives of molasses and barley and the effects of additives on silage quality, in vitro digestibility, and energy content. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 3, 475–482. https://ajindex.com/articles/614505

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Yıldız S, Erdoğan S, Demirel M. Effect of silage volatile fatty acid content on some milk and meat yield and quality properties. Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of the Institute of Science. 2019; 24 (19): 64-71
  2. Kiliç U. Using canola forage as roughage source in ruminant nutrition. Journal of Lalahan Livestock Research Institute. 2009; 49 (2): 125-135
  3. Kılıç U, Erişek A. Effects of additive use on silage quality and ın vitro digestibility of some Brassica silages. Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 2019; 6 (11): 163-171
  4. Sefali A. The economic importance of biology and brassica species found in Turkey. In: Gıdık B and Serencam H (editors). Iksad Publications. ISBN 978-625-7029-15-5. An Overview of the Economic Importance of Plants. 2019. (pp.4-39)
  5. Doğan Daş B, Denek N. Effect of wheat straw and molasses supplementation on quality, lamb performance, and digestibility of forage turnip (Brassica rapa) silage. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science 2021; 11 (3): 547-555
  6. Tiryakioglu H, Türk M. Effects of different sowing and harvesting times on yield and quality of forage turnip (Brassica rapa l.) Grown as a second crop. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 2012; 17 (2): 166-170
  7. Gemalmaz E, Bilal T. Alternative roughage sources. Journal of Lalahan Livestock Research Institute. 2016; 56 (2): 63-69
  8. Çetin I and Duru Arslan A. Determination of some quality properties of ensiled forage turnip (Brassica rapa) with different additives. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 2020; 29: 2766-2771
  9. Polan CE, Starling TM, Huber JT, Miller CN, Sandy RA. Yields, composition and nutritive evaluation of barley silage at three stages of maturity for lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 1968; 51: 1801-1805
  10. Association of Official analytical chemists. Official Methods of Analysis 1990. Vol.1. 15th ed. AOAC, Arlington, VA
  11. Goering MK, Van Soest PJ. Forage fibre analysis. Agricultural Handbook, No.379. Agricultural Research, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1970
  12. Markham P. A steam distilation apparatus suitable for microkjeldahl analyses. Journal Biochemistry 1942. 36: 790-797
  13. Suzuki M, Lund CW. Improved gas-liquid chromatography for simultaneous determination of volatile fatty acids and lactic acid in silage. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1980; 28: 1040-1
  14. Kılıç A. Silo Yemi. 1984. Bilgehan Basımevi. İzmir
  15. Ankom (2002). Operator’s Manual ANKOM ll 200/220 Fiber Analyzer. ANKOM Technology Corp., Fa