SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2017 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 2

Is standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy still the standard treatment modality for renal stones less than three centimeters?

Üç santimetrenin altındaki böbrek taşlarında 'standart perkütan nefrolitotomi' hala standart tedavi modalitesi mi?

Ömer SARILAR
Mehmet Fatih AKBULUT
Faruk ÖZGÖR
Zafer Gökhan GÜRBÜZ
Metin SAVUN
Burak UÇPINAR
Onur KÜÇÜKTOPÇU
Murat BİNBAY
Pages
165–170
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mean operation time was significantly shorter in the sPNL group(p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of study was to compare the efficiency and safety of standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy(sPNL) and miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPNL) in lower calyx and/or pelvicstones smaller than three centimeters.Material and methods: From October 2010 to August 2015, 108 mPNL and 176 sPNL procedures wereperformed for renal stones smaller than three cm and located in the lower calyx and/or renal pelvis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Postoperative success wasdefined as complete stone clearance and/or clinically insignificant residual fragments at 3rd month.Results: Preoperative characteristics were similar between sPNL and mPNL groups except previous renalstone operation history and gender.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mean operation time was significantly shorter in the sPNL group(p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of study was to compare the efficiency and safety of standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy(sPNL) and miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPNL) in lower calyx and/or pelvicstones smaller than three centimeters.Material and methods: From October 2010 to August 2015, 108 mPNL and 176 sPNL procedures wereperformed for renal stones smaller than three cm and located in the lower calyx and/or renal pelvis. Allpatients were evaluated preoperatively with intravenous pyelography and/or computed tomography. Intraoperativeparameters, post-operative results and complications were recorded. Postoperative success wasdefined as complete stone clearance and/or clinically insignificant residual fragments at 3rd month.Results: Preoperative characteristics were similar between sPNL and mPNL groups except previous renalstone operation history and gender. The mean operation time was significantly shorter in the sPNL group(p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmadaki amacımız; alt kaliks ve/veya pelvis yerleşimli 3 santimetreden küçük böbrek taşlarının tedavisinde standart perkütan nefrolitotomi (sPNL) ve mini perkütan nefrolitotomi (mPNL) operasyonlarının etkinliği ve güvenirliğini karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve yöntemler: Ekim 2010 ve Ağustos 2015 tarihleri arasında, alt kaliks ve/veya pelvis yerleşimli 3 santimetreden küçük böbrek taşları nedeniyle 108 hastaya mPNL ve 176 hastaya sPNL prosedürleri uygulandı. Tüm hastalar işlem öncesi intravenöz pyelografi ve/veya bilgisayarlı tomografi ile değerlendirildi. Operasyon esnasındaki parametreler, operasyon sonrası sonuçlar ve komplikasyonlar kaydedildi. Operasyon sonrası 3. ayda yapılan görüntülemelerde taşsızlık sağlanmışsa ve/veya klinik olarak önemsiz fragmanlar mevcut ise işlem başarılı kabul edildi. Bulgular: İki grup arasında geçirilmiş böbrek cerrahisi hikayesi ve cinsiyet dışında belirgin farklılık yoktu. Operasyon süresi sPNL grubunda belirgin olarak daha kısaydı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

SARILAR, Ö., AKBULUT, M. F., ÖZGÖR, F., GÜRBÜZ, Z. G., SAVUN, M., UÇPINAR, B., KÜÇÜKTOPÇU, O., BİNBAY, M. (2022). Is standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy still the standard treatment modality for renal stones less than three centimeters?. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 2, 165–170. https://ajindex.com/articles/614438

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. El-Nahas AR, Shokeir AA, El-Assmy AM, Mohsen T, Shoma AM, Eraky I, et al. Post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy extensive hemorrhage: a study of risk factors. J Urol 2007;177:576-9. [CrossRef] Richstone L, Reggio E, Ost MC, Seideman C, Fossett LK, Okeke Z, et al. Hemorrhage following percutaneous renal surgery’ characterization of angiographic findings. J Endourol 2008;22:1129-35. [CrossRef] Patterson DE, Segura JW, Leroy AJ, Benson RC Jr, May G. The etiology and treatment of delayed bleeding following percutaneous lithotripsy. J Urol 1985;133:447-51.
  2. Abdelhafez MF, Amend B, Bedke J, Kruck S, Nagele U, Stenzi A, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative study of the management of small and large renal stones. Urology 2013;81:241-5. [CrossRef] Cheng F, Yu W, Zhang X, Yang S, Xia Y, Ruan Y. Minimally invasive tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones. J Endourol 2010;24:1579-82. [CrossRef] Srivastava A, Singh KJ, Suri A, Dubey D, Kumar A, Kapoor R, et al. Vascular complications after Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: are there any predictive factors? Urology 2005;66:38-40.
  3. Clayman RV, Surya V, Miller RP, Castaneda-Zuniga WR, Smith AD, Hunter DH, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: extraction of renal and ureteral calculi from 100 patients. J Urol 1984;131:868-71
  4. Stoller ML, Wolf JS Jr, St Lezin MA. Estimated blood loss and transfusion rates associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 1994;152:1977-81.
  5. Guohua Z, Zhong W, Li X, Wu K, Chen W, Lei M, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: a novel single session approach via multiple 14-18 Fr tracts. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2007;17:124-8. [CrossRef] Wang Y, Jiang F, Wang Y, Hou Y, Zhang H, Chen Q, et al. Postpercutaneous nephrolithotomy septic shock and severe hemorrhage: a study of risk factors. Urol Int 2012;88:307-10. [CrossRef] Singla M, Srivastava A, Kapoor R, Gupta N, Ansari MS, Dubey D, et al. Aggressive approach to staghorn calculi: safety and efficacy of multiple tracts percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 2008;71:1039-42. [CrossRef] Kukreja R, Desai M, Patel S, Bapat S, Desai M. Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study. J Endourol 2004;18:715-22. [CrossRef] Zeng G, Mai Z, Zhao Z, Li X, Zhong W, Yuan J, et al. Treatment of upper urinary calculi with Chinese minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single-center experience with 12,482 consecutive patients over 2