Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2017 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 4

Transobturator four arms mesh in the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence with cystocele

Sistoselin eşlik ettiği stres üriner inkontinansta cerrahi tedavi olarak dört kollu transobturator meş uygulaması

Pages
517–524
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Forty (80%) patients were cured from SUI, 8 (16%) patients were improvedand 2 (4%) patients failed to respond.Conclusion: Cystocele associated with SUI can be repaired with transobturator four-arms mesh with promisingresults, improved quality of life, and tolerable side effects

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aims to evaluate safety and efficacy of four arms polypropylene mesh in the long- termfollow-up in the management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) associated with cystocele.Material and methods: This prospective study was conducted on 50 female patients with SUI associated withcystocele.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Follow- up visits were planned at 3, 9 and 18 months after surgery.Results: The mean operative time was 37.4±10.2 (25-60) minutes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Forty (80%) patients were cured from SUI, 8 (16%) patients were improvedand 2 (4%) patients failed to respond.Conclusion: Cystocele associated with SUI can be repaired with transobturator four-arms mesh with promisingresults, improved quality of life, and tolerable side effects
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate safety and efficacy of four arms polypropylene mesh in the long- termfollow-up in the management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) associated with cystocele.Material and methods: This prospective study was conducted on 50 female patients with SUI associated withcystocele. Patients underwent placement of transobturator four-arms mesh implants. Stress incontinence wasevaluated using cough stress test with and without prolapse reduction, Stamey’s grading of SUI, the validatedArabic version of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form and King HealthQuestionnaire forms. Perioperative parameters evaluated included age, body mass index, grade of SUI, timeof procedure, hospital stay after surgery, difference between pre-, and postoperative serum hemoglobin values,and need for blood transfusion. Follow- up visits were planned at 3, 9 and 18 months after surgery.Results: The mean operative time was 37.4±10.2 (25-60) minutes. Blood transfusion was not required. Themean hospital stay was 30.5±10 (24-48) hrs. Five (10%) patients had fever and urinary tract infections werenoticed in five (10%) patients. Two (4%) women had urine retention after catheter removal and vaginal mesherosion was present in one (2%) patient. Forty (80%) patients were cured from SUI, 8 (16%) patients were improvedand 2 (4%) patients failed to respond.Conclusion: Cystocele associated with SUI can be repaired with transobturator four-arms mesh with promisingresults, improved quality of life, and tolerable side effects

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışma, sistosele eşlik eden stres üriner inkontinans (SÜİ) tedavisinde dört kollu polipropilen meşin uzun dönemde tedavideki güvenlilik ve etkinliğini değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Gereç ve yöntemler: Bu prospektif çalışmaya eş zamanlı SÜİ ve sistoseli olan 50 hasta dahil edilmiştir. Hastalara dört kollu transobturator meş uygulanmıştır. Stres inkontinans prolapsun yerine konmasıyla birlikte veya yalnız başına öksürük stres testi, Stamey stres inkontinans derecelendirmesi, Arapça için geçerliliği onaylanmış Uluslararası İnkontinans Konsültasyonu Anketi –Kısa Formu (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form) ve King Sağlık Sorgulama Anketi (King Health Questionnaire (KHQ) ile değerlendirildi. Yaş, vücut kitle indeksi (VKİ), SÜİ derecelendirmesi, işlemin zamanı, postoperatif dönemde hastanede kalış süresi, ameliyat öncesi ve sonrası serum hemoglobin değerleri arasındaki farklılık, kan nakli gereksinmesi gibi perioperatif parametreler değerlendirildi. Ameliyat sonrası 3, 9 ve 18. aylarda hasta takibi yapıldı Bulgular: O rtalama a meliyat süresi 37,4±10,2 (25-60) d akika idi. H içbir hastada k an t ransfüzyonu gerekmedi. Hastanede kalış süresi ortalama 30,5±10 (24-48) saat idi. Beş (%10) hastada ateş ve yine 5 (%10) hastada idrar yolu enfeksiyonları mevcuttu. İki (%4) kadında sonda çıkartıldıktan sonra idrar retansiyonu oldu ve bir (%2) hastada vajinal meş erozyonu görüldü. Kırk (%80) hastada SÜİ yönünden tam kür sağlandı, 8 (%16) hastada iyileşme gözlendi. İki (%4) hastada işlem başarısız idi. Sonuç: SÜİ ile ilişkili sistosel dört kollu transobturator meş ile onarılabilir. Bu teknik s ağladığı yaşam kalite iyileşmesi ve tolere edilebilir yan etkileriyle umut vadeden sonuçlar vermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SHERİF, H., OTHMAN, T. S., ELDKHAKHANY, A., ELKADY, H., ELFALLAH, A. (2022). Transobturator four arms mesh in the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence with cystocele. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 4, 517–524. https://ajindex.com/articles/614418

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Leanza V, Zanghi G, Vecchio R, Leanza G. How to prevent mesh erosion in transobturator Tension-Free Incontinence Cystocoele Treatment (TICT): a comparative survey. G Chir 2015;36:21-5. [CrossRef] Yonguc T, Bozkurt I, Arslan B, Kozacioglu Z, Gulden I, Gunlusoy B, et al. Outcomes of two different incision techniques for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence with concomitant anterior vaginal wall prolapse: World J Urol 2015;33:1045-9.
  2. Ridgeway B, Walters MD, Paraiso MF, Barber MD, McAchran SE, Goldman HB, et al. Early experience with mesh excision for adverse outcomes after transvaginal mesh placement using prolapse kits. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:703.e1-7. Margulies RU, Lewicky-Gaupp C, Fenner DE, McGuire EJ, Clemens JQ, Delancey J. Complications requiring reoperation following vaginal mesh kit procedures for prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:678.e1-4. Vaiyapuri GR, Han HC, Lee LC, Tseng LA, Wong HF. Use of the gynecare prolift system in surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: 1- year outcome. Int Urogynecol J 2011;22:869-77. [CrossRef] Gauruder-Burmester A, Koutouzidou P, Tunn R. Effect of vaginal polypropylene mesh implants on sexual function. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;142:76-80. [CrossRef Lucente V, Murphy M, Saiz C. Vaginal prolapse repair: suture repair versus mesh augmentation: a urogynecology perspective. Urol Clin North Am 2012;39:325-33. [CrossRef] Palma P, Riccetto C, Muller V, Rogerio F, Sarsotti C, Ortiz C, et al. A monoprosthesis for the simultaneous correction of cystocele and urinary stress incontinence - a multicentric trial. Urology 2007;70(Suppl 3A):193-4.
  3. Abed H, Rahn DD, Lowenstein L, Balk EM, Clemons JL, Rogers RG. Systematic Review Group of the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons. Incidence and management of graft erosion wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 2011;22:789-98. [CrossRef] Elgamasy AKH, Elashry OM, Elenin MA, Eltatawy HH, Elsharaby MD. The use of polypropylene mesh as a transobturator sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (early experience with 40 cases). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008;19:828- 33. [CrossRef] Kaufman Y, Singh SS, Alturki H, Lam A. Age and sexual activity are risk factors for mesh exposure following transvaginal mesh repair. Int Urogynecol J 2011;22:307-13. [CrossRef] Finamore PS, Echols KT, Hunter K, Goldstein HB, Holzberg AS, Vakili B. Risk factors for mesh erosion