Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2018 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3

Critical evaluation of the PADUA score in a retrospective analysis of open partial nephrectomy

Açık parsiyel nefrektominin retrospektif analizinde PADUA skorunun eleştirel değerlendirmesi

Pages
208–212
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Dividing the patients into just two PADUAgroups (

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Several nephrometry scores have been developed to predict postoperative complications in partialnephrectomy based on preoperative imaging characteristics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The most widely used is the PADUA score.We retrospectively evaluated the value of the PADUA score in a consecutive series of open partial nephrectomyin our institution.Material and methods: Two hundred and thirteen consecutive patients who underwent open partial nephrectomyfrom January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2016 in our department for suspected renal malignancies wereincluded in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Dividing the patients into just two PADUAgroups (
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Several nephrometry scores have been developed to predict postoperative complications in partialnephrectomy based on preoperative imaging characteristics. The most widely used is the PADUA score.We retrospectively evaluated the value of the PADUA score in a consecutive series of open partial nephrectomyin our institution.Material and methods: Two hundred and thirteen consecutive patients who underwent open partial nephrectomyfrom January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2016 in our department for suspected renal malignancies wereincluded in the study. The PADUA score was determined from preoperative computed tomography scans anda retrospective analysis of complications and other relevant parameters based on chart review was performed.Results: Two hundred and thirteen patients underwent open partial nephrectomy, and 72.7% of them had aconfirmed renal cell carcinoma (62.9% stage pT1). A total of 73 patients had peri-or postoperative complications(Clavien-Dindo Grades 1-5, n=5, 37, 24, 5 and 0, respectively). Logistic and linear regression analysis did notshow any correlation of complications with the preoperative three-group PADUA score. However, the PADUAscores were significantly correlated with operative and ischemia time. Dividing the patients into just two PADUAgroups (

Özet

Amaç: Parsiyel nefrektomide preoperatif görüntüleme bulgularına dayanarak postoperatif komplikasyonların öngörülmesi için nefrometri skorları geliştirilmiştir. En yaygın kullanılan PADUA skorudur. Kurumumuzda gerçekleştirilen ardışık açık nefrektomi serisinde PADUA skorunu retrospektif olarak değerlendirdik. Gereç ve yöntemler: Anabilim dalımızda 1 Ocak 2012 ile 31 Aralık 2016 tarihleri arasında renal malignite şüphesi nedeniyle açık parsiyel nefrektomi yapılan 213 ardışık hasta çalışmaya alınmıştır. Preoperatif bilgisayarlı tomografi taramalarına göre PADUA skoru belirlenmiş, hasta kayıtları gözden geçirilerek komplikasyonlar ve diğer ilişkin parametrelerin retrospektif analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bulgular: İki yüz on üç hastaya açık parsiyel nefrektomi yapılmış ve %72,7’sinin renal hücreli karsinom olduğu saptanmıştır (%62,9’unda evre pT1). Toplam 73 hastada peri veya postoperatif komplikasyonlar mevcuttu (Clavien-Dindo dereceleri1-5, sırasıyla n=5, 37, 24, 5 and 0). Lojistik ve lineer regresyon analizi komplikasyonlar ile preoperatif üç gruplu PADUA skoru arasında herhangi bir korelasyon varlığını gösterememiştir. Ancak PADUA skorları ameliyat ve iskemi süresiyle anlamlı derecede ilişkiliydi. Hastaları yalnızca iki PADUA grubuna ayırmak (

🔖

Cite This Article

DRAEGER, D. L., SİEVERT, K., HAKENBERG, O. W. (2022). Critical evaluation of the PADUA score in a retrospective analysis of open partial nephrectomy. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3, 208–212. https://ajindex.com/articles/614388

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Mottrie A, Schatteman P, De Wil P, De Troyer B, Novara G, Ficarra V. Validation of the preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) score in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy series. World J Urol 2013;31:799-804. [CrossRef] Kruck S, Anastasiadis AG, Walcher U, Stenzl A, Herrmann TRW, Nagele U. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: risk stratification according to patient and tumor characteristics. World J Urol 2012;30:639-46. [CrossRef] Waldert M, Klatte T. Nephrometry scoring systems for surgical decision-making in nephron-sparing surgery: Curr Opin Urol 2014;24:437-40. [CrossRef] Hew MN, Baseskioglu B, Barwari K, Axwijk PH, Can C, Horesblas S, et al. Critical appraisal of the PADUA classification and assessment of the R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry score in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2011;186:42-6. [CrossRef] Tyritzis SI, Papadoukakis S, Katafigiotis I, Adamakis I, Anastasiou I, Stravodimos KG, et al. Implementation and external validation of preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) score for predicting complications in 74 consecutive partial nephrectomies. BJU Int 2012;109:1813-8. [CrossRef] Kong W, Zhang J, Dong B, Chen Y, Wue W, Liu D, et al. Application of a standardized anatomical classification in an Chinese partial nephrectomy series. Int J Urol 2012;19:551-8. [CrossRef] Zhang ZY, Tang Q, Li XS, Zhang Q, Mayer WA, Wu JY, et al. Clinical analysis of the PADUA and the RENAL scoring systems for renal neoplasms: A retrospective study of 245 patients undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Int J Urol 2014;21:40-4. [CrossRef] Zhamshid Okhunov SRB. The comparison of three renal tumor scoring systems: C-index, PADUA and R.E.N.A.L Nephrometry scores. J Endourol Soc 2011;25:1921-4. [CrossRef] Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S, Macchi V, Porzionato A, De Caro R, et al. Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 2009;56:786-93. [CrossRef] Peycelon M, Hupertan V, Comperat E, Renard-Penna R, Vaessen C, Conort P, et al. Long-term outcomes after nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma larger than 4 cm. J Urol 2009;181:35- 41. [CrossRef] Boulière F, Crepel M, Bigot P, Pignot G, Bessede T, de la Taille, et al. Intérét de la néphretomie partielle pour la preservation de la function rénales des patients ayant une tumeur rénale de plus de 4 cm. Prog En Urol 2011;21:842-50. [Cross