Journals / Turkish Journal of Physics / 1998 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 7

Testing deca-TeV unified compositeness at the 4 TeV $mu^+ mu^-$ collider

Pages
631–643
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is shown that at 95%~C.L.~the unified substructure could be investigated at the collider in the processes $mu^+ mu^- to bar ff$ up to the compositeness scale {cal O}(150 TeV), in the processes $mu^+ mu^- to ZH, W^+W^-$ up to {cal O} (100 TeV) and in the process $mu^+ mu^- to ZHH$ up to {cal O}(40 TeV), which lie in the naturally preferable Deca-TeV region.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the framework of the unified compositeness of leptons, quarks and Higgs bosons, the hidden local symmetry $hat H_{loc}=SU(2)_Ltimes U(1)_Y$ with the heavy composite vector bosons, in addition to the SM gauge bosons, is briefly described.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Manifestations of the residual interactions at the 4~TeV $mu^+ mu^-$ collider are studied.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is shown that at 95%~C.L.~the unified substructure could be investigated at the collider in the processes $mu^+ mu^- to bar ff$ up to the compositeness scale {cal O}(150 TeV), in the processes $mu^+ mu^- to ZH, W^+W^-$ up to {cal O} (100 TeV) and in the process $mu^+ mu^- to ZHH$ up to {cal O}(40 TeV), which lie in the naturally preferable Deca-TeV region.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In the framework of the unified compositeness of leptons, quarks and Higgs bosons, the hidden local symmetry $hat H_{loc}=SU(2)_Ltimes U(1)_Y$ with the heavy composite vector bosons, in addition to the SM gauge bosons, is briefly described. Supplementary hypothesis of the vector boson dominance (VBD) of the SM gauge interactions is considered. It is argued that this should produce the universal dominant residual interactions of the SM composite particles, i.e., all of the fermions and Higgs bosons. Restrictions on the universal residual fermion-fermion, fermion-boson and boson-boson interactions due to the VBD are investigated. Manifestations of the residual interactions at the 4~TeV $mu^+ mu^-$ collider are studied. It is shown that at 95%~C.L.~the unified substructure could be investigated at the collider in the processes $mu^+ mu^- to bar ff$ up to the compositeness scale {cal O}(150 TeV), in the processes $mu^+ mu^- to ZH, W^+W^-$ up to {cal O} (100 TeV) and in the process $mu^+ mu^- to ZHH$ up to {cal O}(40 TeV), which lie in the naturally preferable Deca-TeV region.

🔖

Cite This Article

KABACHENKO, V. V., PIROGOV, Y. F. (2022). Testing deca-TeV unified compositeness at the 4 TeV $mu^+ mu^-$ collider. Turkish Journal of Physics, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 7, 631–643. https://ajindex.com/articles/614104

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. V. V. Kabachenko and Yu. F. Pirogov, submitted to the 28th Int. Conf. on High Energy Physics, Warsaw, 1996; hep-ph/9612275, to be published in Yad. Fiz
  2. Yu. F. Pirogov, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A7, 6473 (1992); in Proc. of the Int. Conf. "Quarks '92",Zvenigorod, 1992, eds. D. Yu. Grigoriev et al. (World Scienti c, Singapore, 1993) 375
  3. Yu. F. Pirogov, Mod. Phys. Lett. A8, 3129 (1993); in Proc. of the Int. School "Particles and Cosmology", Baksan Valley, 1993, eds. E. N. Alexeev et al. (World Scienti c, Singapore,1994) p. 151
  4. Proc. of the First Workshop on the Physics Potential and Development of + Collider,Napa, 1992, Nucl. Instr. Meth. A350, 24 (1994)
  5. V. Barger et al., MADPH-95-873 (1995), in Proc. of the Second Workshop on the Physics Potential and Development of + Collider, Sausalito, 1994
  6. J. F. Gunion, UCD-95-35 (1995), in Proc. of the Intern. Europhysics Conf. on High Energy Physics, Brussels, 1995
  7. V. Barger, M. S. Berger, J. F. Gunion and T. Han, hep-ph/9704290, in Proc. of the Third Workshop on the Physics Potential and Development of + Collider, Santa Barbara,1996
  8. S. Coleman, J.Wess and B. Zumino, Phys. Rev. 177, 2239 (1969); C. G. Callan, S. Coleman,J. Wess and B. Zumino, ibid, 2247
  9. M. Bando, T. Kugo, S. Uehara, K. Yamawaki and T. Yanagida, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1215(1985); M. Bando, T. Kugo and K. Yamawaki, Nucl. Phys. B259, 493 (1985); Prog. Theor.Phys. 73, 1541 (1985); Phys. Rep. 164, 217 (1988)
  10. A. D'Adda, P. diVecchia and M. Lüscher, Nucl. Phys. B146, 63 (1978); Nucl. Phys. B152,125 (1979); A. M. Polyakov, Gauge Fields and Strings, Contemporary Concepts in Physics,v. 3 (Harwood Academic Publishers, 1987) p. 139
  11. V. V. Kabachenko and Yu. F. Pirogov, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A10, 3187 (1995)
  12. V. V. Kabachenko and Yu. F. Pirogov, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A11, 2293 (1996)
  13. D. Guryev, V. A. Ilyin, V. V. Kabachenko and Yu. F. Pirogov, in preparation
  14. E. E. Boos, M. N. Dubinin, V. A. Ilyin, A. E. Pukhov and V. I. Savrin, preprint SNUTP-94-116, hep-ph/9503280; E. E. Boos et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. C5 615 (1994)
  15. M. Atac, report at this Workshop
  16. K. Hagiwara, R. D. Peccei, D. Zeppenfeld and K. Hikasa, Nucl. Phys. B282, 253 (1987);M. A. Samuel et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 9 (1991)
  17. C. N. Leung, S. L. Love and S. Z. Rao, Z. Phys. C { Part. and Fields 31, 433 (1986);W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler, Nucl. Phys. B236, 621 (1986)
  18. A. de Rujula, M. B. Gavela, P. Hernandes and E. Masso, Nucl. Phys