SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Physics / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 3

Phenomenological potential calculations for cluster decays

Asım SOYLU
Pages
217–226
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The present results provide useful information andextra theoretical data for future measurements of the unknown half-lives of possible cluster emissions from various nuclei

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The half-lives of cluster decays from various nuclei having experimentally measured values have been calculatedby using the Wentzel{Kramers{Brillouin method together with the Bohr{Sommerfeld quantization condition for threedifferent types of phenomenological nuclear interactions: Woods{Saxon (WS), squared Woods{Saxon (WS-2), and mixedWoods{Saxon (mWS) potentials.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By comparing the results with experimental values, rms values have been calculated.The half-lives of14C,15N,16O,17O,18O,20O,22O,23F,22Ne,24Ne,25Ne,26Ne,28Mg,30Mg, and34Si decays fromvarious isotopes whose experimental half-lives are unknown have also been calculated by using the WS, WS-2, and mWSpotentials.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The present results provide useful information andextra theoretical data for future measurements of the unknown half-lives of possible cluster emissions from various nuclei
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The half-lives of cluster decays from various nuclei having experimentally measured values have been calculatedby using the Wentzel{Kramers{Brillouin method together with the Bohr{Sommerfeld quantization condition for threedifferent types of phenomenological nuclear interactions: Woods{Saxon (WS), squared Woods{Saxon (WS-2), and mixedWoods{Saxon (mWS) potentials. By comparing the results with experimental values, rms values have been calculated.The half-lives of14C,15N,16O,17O,18O,20O,22O,23F,22Ne,24Ne,25Ne,26Ne,28Mg,30Mg, and34Si decays fromvarious isotopes whose experimental half-lives are unknown have also been calculated by using the WS, WS-2, and mWSpotentials. The obtained results have been compared with results of the liquid drop model, the Christensen{Wintherpotential form, and the Coulomb and proximity potential model. Even if the logarithmic values of the half-lives havesimilar behaviors, there are differences in size between the values. The present results provide useful information andextra theoretical data for future measurements of the unknown half-lives of possible cluster emissions from various nuclei

🔖

Cite This Article

SOYLU, A. (2022). Phenomenological potential calculations for cluster decays. Turkish Journal of Physics, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 3, 217–226. https://ajindex.com/articles/614055

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Hofmann, S.; Heberger, F. P.; Ackermann, D.; Antalic, S.; Cagarda, P.;Cwiok, S.; Kindler, J.; Kojouharova, B.;Lommel, R.; Mann, G. et al.Eur. Phys. J. A2001,10, 5-10. [2]Oganessian, Y. T.; Utyonkov, V. K.; Lobanov, Y. V.; Abdullin, F. S.; Polyakov, A. N.; Shirokovsky, I. V.; Tsyganov,Y. S.; Gulbekian, G. G.; Bogomolov, S. L.; Gikal, B. N. et al.Phys. Rev. C2004,70, 064609-14. [3]Oganessian, Y. T.; Utyonkov, V. K.; Lobanov, Y. V.; Abdullin, F. S.; Polyakov, A. N.; Sagaidak, R. N.; Shirokovsky,I. V.; Tsyganov, Y. S.; Voinov, A. A.; Gulbekian, G. G. et al.Phys. Rev. C2006,74, 044602-9. [4]Gamow, G.Z. Phys.1928,51, 204-212. [5]Gurney, R. W.; Condon, E. U.Nature1928,122,439. [6]Geiger, H.; Nuttall, J. M.The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science1911,22, 613-621. [7]Xu, C.; Ren, Z.Phys. Rev. C2006,74, 014304-10. [8]Xu, C.; Ren, Z.Phys. Rev. C2007,75, 044301-5. [9]Delion, D. S.; Liotta, R. J.; Wyss, R.Phys. Rev. C2007,76, 044301-8. [10]Peltonen, S.; Delion, D. S; Suhonen, J.Phys. Rev. C2008,78, 034608-7. [11]Ni, D.; Ren, Z.Phys. Rev. C2009,80, 051303(R). [12]Arun, S. K.; Gupta, R. K.; Singh, B. B.; Kanwar, S.; Sharma, M. K.Phys. Rev. C2009,79, 064616-7. [13]Zhang, G. L.; Le, X. Y.; Zhang, H. Q.Phys. Rev. C2009,80, 064325-5. [14]Ni, D.; Ren, Z.Phys. Rev. C2010,81, 024315-10. [15]Ni, D.; Ren, Z.Phys. Rev. C2011,84, 037301-4. [16]Santhosh, K. P.; Sahadevan, S.Nucl. Phys. A2010,847, 42-65. [17]Santhosh, K. P.; Joseph, J. G.; Priyanka, B.Nucl. Phys. A2012,877, 1-18. [18]Ismail, M.; Adel, A.Phys. Rev. C2014,89, 034617-9. [19]Denisov, V. Y.Phys. Rev. C2013,88, 044608-11. [20]Coban, A.; Bayrak, O.; Soylu, A.; Boztosun, I.Phys. Rev. C2012,85, 044324-7. [21]Ismail, M.; Ellithi, A. Y.; Adel, A.; Abdulghany, A. R.Nucl. Phys. A2016,947, 64-75. [22]Pahlavani, M. R.; Alavi, S. A.; Tahanipour, N.Mod. Phys. Lett. A2013,28, 1350065-11. [23]Javadimanesh, E.; Hassanabadi, H.; Rajabi, A. A.; Rahimov, H.; Zarrinkamar, S.Chinese Phys. C2013,37,114102-11. [24]Naderi, D.; Zargooshi, M.Int. J. Mod. Phys. E2015,24, 1550010-10. [25]Ni, D.; Ren, Z.Phys. Rev. C2010,81, 064318-6. [26]Rose, H. J.; Jones, G. A.Nature1984,307, 245. [27]Gales, S.; Hourani, E.; Hussonnois, M.; Schapira, J. P.; Stab, L.; Vergnes, M.Phys. Rev. Lett.1984,53, 759. [28]Price, P. B., Stevenson, J. D.; Barwick, S. W.; Ravn, H. L.Phys. Rev. Lett.1985, 54, 297. [29]Sandulescu, A.; Poenaru, D. N.; Greiner, W.Sov. J. Part. Nucl.1980, 11, 528. [30]Sheng, Z.; Ni, D.; Ren, Z.J. Phys. G N