Journals / Turkish Journal of Physics / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1

Investigating the instability of the torus around the black hole in the presence of the radial and angular velocity perturbations

Pages
25–40
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results observed from the radial velocity perturbation might be used to explain the Papaloizou-Pringle instability observed in N GC 1068

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We have performed the numerical simulation of the perturbed relativistic torus around the black hole by solving the general relativistic hydrodynamics equations on the equatorial plane.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The signi cant oscillations and oscillation modes in the mass accretion rates are observed around the rotating black hole with a radial velocity perturbation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results observed from the radial velocity perturbation might be used to explain the Papaloizou-Pringle instability observed in N GC 1068
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

We have performed the numerical simulation of the perturbed relativistic torus around the black hole by solving the general relativistic hydrodynamics equations on the equatorial plane. We have monitored the different simple models by applying the radial and angular velocity perturbations to the steady state torus around the black hole. The instabilities are triggered by adding the subsonic velocity elds over the radial and angular velocities of the stable torus. We have found the disk instability so-called the Papaloizou-Pringle instability and excited modes of the Quasi-Periodic Oscillations (QPOs) in the thin disk approximation case. The signi cant oscillations and oscillation modes in the mass accretion rates are observed around the rotating black hole with a radial velocity perturbation. The angular velocity perturbation can not create the signi cant variations and QPOs in the nonselfgravitating relativistic torus around the nonrotating and rotating black holes. The results observed from the radial velocity perturbation might be used to explain the Papaloizou-Pringle instability observed in N GC 1068

🔖

Cite This Article

DÖNMEZ, O. (2022). Investigating the instability of the torus around the black hole in the presence of the radial and angular velocity perturbations. Turkish Journal of Physics, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1, 25–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/614023

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. 1] Abramowicz, M.A.; Fragile, P.C. Living Rev. Relativity 2013, 16. [2] Abramowicz, M.A.; Calvani, M.; Nobili, L. Nature 1983, 302, 597-599. [3] Abramowicz, M.A.; Kluzniak, W. A&A 2001, 374, L19-L20. [4] Silbergleit, A.S.;, Wagoner, R.V.; Ortega-Rodriguez, M. Astrophysical Journal 2001, 548, 335. [5] Johannsen, T.; Psaltis, D. ApJ 2011, 726, 11. [6] Bursa, M.; Abramowicz, M.A.; Karas, V.; Kluzniak, W. ApJ 2004, 617, L45-L48. [7] Bursa, M. Astron.Nachr. 2005, 326, 849-855. [8] Montero, P.J.; Font, J.A.; Shibata, M. PRL 2010, 104, 191101. [9] Lee, W.H.; Abramowicz, M.A.; Kluzniak, W. ApJ 2004, 603, L93. [10] Donmez, O. MNRAS 2014, 438, 846. [11] Donmez, O. IJMPD 2014, 23, 1450050. [12] Donmez, O. MPLA 2015, 30, 1550071 [13] Mazur, G.P.; Zanotti, O.; Sadowski, A.; Mishra, B.; Kluzniak, W. MNRAS 2016, 456, 3245-3252. [14] Parthasarathy, V.; Manousakis, A.; Kluzniak, W. MNRAS 2016, 458, 666-672. [15] Torok, G.; Goluchova, K.; Horak, J.; Sramkova, E.; Urbanec, M.; Pechacek, T.; Bakala, P. MNRAS: Letters 2016, 457, L19-L23. [16] Kiuchi, K.; Shibata, M.; Montero, P.J.; Font, J.A. Phys. Rev. Ltt. 2011, 106, 251102. [17] Font, J. A.; Miller, M.; Suen, W.-M.; Tobias, M. Phys. Rev. D 2000, 61, 044011. [18] Donmez, O. Astrophys. Spac. Sci. 2004, 293, 323. [19] Yildiran, D.; Donmez, O. IJMPD 2010, 19, 2111-2133. [20] Donmez, O.; Zanotti, O.; Rezzolla, L. MNRAS 2011, 412, 1659. [21] Nagar, A.; Font, J.A.; Zanotti, O.; de Pietri, R. PRD 2005, 72, 024007. [22] Zanotti, O.; Rezzolla, L.; Font, J.A. MNRAS 2003, 341, 832. [23] Zanotti, O.; Font, J.A.; Rezzolla, L.; Montero, P.J. MNRAS 2005, 356, 1371. [24] Zanotti O.; Rezzolla, L. MSAIS 2003, 1, 192. [25] Abramowicz, M.A.; Jaroszynski, M.; Sikora, M. A&A 1978, 63, 221-224. [26] De Villiers, J.-P.; Hawley, J. ApJ 2002, 577, 866. [27] Papaloizou J. C. M.; Pringle, J.E. MNRAS 1984, 208, 721. [28] Papaloizou J.C.M.; Pringle, J. E. MNRAS 1985, 213, 799. [29] Donmez, O. MPLA 2007, 22, 141-157. [30] Montero, P.J.; Zanotti, O.; Font, J.A.; Rezzolla, L. MNRAS 2007, 378, 1101. [31] Rezzolla, L.; Yoshida, S.; Zanotti, O. MNRAS 2003a, 344, 978. [32] Wagoner, R.V.; Silbergleit, A.S.; Ortega-Rodrguez, M. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2001, 559, L25L28. [33] Donmez, O. MNRAS 2012, 426, 1533-1545. [34] Garcia-Burillo, S.; Combes, F.; Almedia, C.R.; Usero, A.; Krips, M.; Alonso-Herrero, A.; Aalto, S.; Casasola, V.; Hunt, L.K.; Martin, S. et.al. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2016, 823, L1