SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Physics / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 1

Quark gluon plasma and upsilon suppression

Rismita GHOSH
Aparajita BHATTACHARYA
Ballari CHAKRABARTI
Pages
61–69
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We have found that the more highly excited state (2S) is less tightly bound and has a larger effective radiusthan the ground state.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The time-dependent suppression probability P(t) of upsilon particles has been estimated due to the screeningwhen embedded in the medium of quark gluon plasma where the screened potential is represented by an optical potentialof typeV(r; ) =[V0+iW01+exp((rR) )].
📊
Key Findings & Data:A similar type of variation of suppression probability has been obtained by others.It has been observed thatt12for melting ofis 1.5 fm/c.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We have found that the more highly excited state (2S) is less tightly bound and has a larger effective radiusthan the ground state.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The time-dependent suppression probability P(t) of upsilon particles has been estimated due to the screeningwhen embedded in the medium of quark gluon plasma where the screened potential is represented by an optical potentialof typeV(r; ) =[V0+iW01+exp((rR) )]. A similar type of variation of suppression probability has been obtained by others.It has been observed thatt12for melting ofis 1.5 fm/c. The variation of the screening radii of heavy mesons(J= ; ) for 1S and 2S states with respect to plasma radius have also been investigated with the same complex screeningpotential. We have found that the more highly excited state (2S) is less tightly bound and has a larger effective radiusthan the ground state.

🔖

Cite This Article

GHOSH, R., BHATTACHARYA, A., CHAKRABARTI, B. (2022). Quark gluon plasma and upsilon suppression. Turkish Journal of Physics, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 1, 61–69. https://ajindex.com/articles/614003

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Adare, A.; Afanasiev, S.; Aidala, C.; Ajitanand, N. N.; Akiba, Y.; Al-Bataineh, H.; Alexander, J.; Aoki, K.;Aramaki, Y.; Atomssa, E. et al.Phys. Rev. C2011,84, 054912. [2]Tang, Z.J. Phys. G2011,38, 124107. [3]Garcia, G. M.J. Phys. G2011,38, 124034. [4]Aad, G.; Abbott, B.; Abdallah, J.; Abdelalim, A. A.; Abdesselam, A.; Abdinov, O.; Abi, B.; Abolins, M.;Abramowicz, H.; Abreu, H. et al.Phys. Lett. B2011,697, 294-312. [5]Matsui, T.; Satz, H.Phys. Lett. B1986,178, 416-422. [6]Lucha, W.; Schoberl, F. F.; Gromes, D.Phys. Rept.1991,200, 127-240. [7]Chu, M. C.; Matsui, T.Phys. Rev. D1988,37, 1851-1855. [8]Mocsy, A.; Petreczky, P.Phys. Rev. Lett.2007,99, 211602. [9]Mocsy, A.; Petreczky, P.Phys. Rev. D2006,73, 074007. [10]Patra, B. K.; Srivastava, D. K.Phys. Lett. B2001,505, 113-118. [11]Kluberg, L.; Satz, H.Landolt Bornstein2010,23, 373-423. [12]Kharzeev, D. E.J. Phys. G2007,34, S445-S452. [13]Atomssa, E. T.Eur. Phys. J. C2009,61, 683-686. [14]Matsui, H.J. Phys. G2011,38, 124002. [15]Silvestre, C.J. Phys. G2011,38, 124033. [16]Chatrchyan, S.; Khachatryan, V.; Sirunyan, A. M.; Tumasyan, A.; Adam, W.; Bergauer, T.; Dragicevic, M.; Ero,J.; Fabjan, C.; Friedl, M. et al.Phys. Rev. Lett.2011,107, 052302. [17]Chatrchyan, S.; Khachatryan, V.; Sirunyan, A. M.; Tumasyan, A.; Adam, W.; Bergauer, T.; Dragicevic, M.; Ero,J.; Fabjan, C.; Friedl, M. et al.J. High Energy Phys.2012,5, 063-54. [18]Chatrchyan, S.; Khachatryan, V.; Sirunyan, A. M.; Tumasyan, A.; Adam, W.; Aguilo, E.; Bergauer, T.; Dragicevic,M.; Ero, J.; Fabjan, C. et al.Phys. Rev. Lett.2012,109, 222301. [19]Nendzig, F.; Wolscin, G.Phys. Rev. C2013,87, 024911. [20]Srivastava, P. K.; Tiwari, S. K.; Singh, C. P.Phys. Rev. C2013,88, 044902. [21]Gunion J. F,; Vogt, R.Nucl. Phys. B1996,492, 301-307. [22]Grandchamp, L.; Lumpkins, S.; Sun, D.; Hees, H. V.; Rapp, R.Phys. Rev. C2006,73, 064906. [23]Kisslinger, L. S.; Liu, M. X.; McGaughey, P.Phys. Rev. D2011,84, 114020. [24]Akamatsu, Y.; Rothkopf A.Phys. Rev. D2012,85, 105011. [25]Das, D. InProceedings of the DAE Symposium on Nuclear Physics, 2012, pp. 37-44. [26]Ganesh, S.; Mishra, M. arXiv: 1402.1560v4[hep-ph]. [27]Banerjee, S. N.; Chakrabarti, B.J. Phys. G1989,15, L13-L17. [28]Banerjee, S. N.; Chakrabarti, B.Nuovo Cimento1989,102A, 1733-1737. [29]Bhattacharya, A.; Raichaudhuri, A.; Chakraborty, B.; Banerjee, S. N.Can. J. Phys.1992,70, 365-368. [30]Hioki, S.; Kanki, T.Prog. Theor. Phys.1990,84, 317-323. [31]Horvath, I.; Lichard, P.; Lietava, R.; Nogova, A.; Pisut, J.Phys.