Journals / Turkish Journal of Physics / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 6

The field blocking on the interface with nonlinear response between nonlinear focusing media

Pages
721–736
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The conditions of the field blocking effect existence’s dependence on the interface and media characteristicsare found.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We consider the nonlinear nonsymmetrical spatially distributed excitations near the thin layer with nonlinearproperties separated with two media with Kerr-type focusing (positive) nonlinearity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We use the nonlinear Schrödingerequation with nonlinear potential containing two parameters to describe the new types of nonlinear stationary states.The problem is reduced to the solution of nonlinear Schrödinger equations on half spaces with the nonlinear boundaryconditions at the interface plane.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The conditions of the field blocking effect existence’s dependence on the interface and media characteristicsare found.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

We consider the nonlinear nonsymmetrical spatially distributed excitations near the thin layer with nonlinearproperties separated with two media with Kerr-type focusing (positive) nonlinearity. We use the nonlinear Schrödingerequation with nonlinear potential containing two parameters to describe the new types of nonlinear stationary states.The problem is reduced to the solution of nonlinear Schrödinger equations on half spaces with the nonlinear boundaryconditions at the interface plane. We obtain and analyze the two types of nonlinear excitations describing the effect ofthe field blocking passing through the interface into one half-space from another one. The field blocking effect is thelocalization of the nonlinear spatially periodic wave during the transition from one half-space to another one where thewave function is monotonically damping from the interface. We derive the exact energy levels of states of special kinds inexplicit form. The conditions of the field blocking effect existence’s dependence on the interface and media characteristicsare found.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAVOTCHENKO, S. E. (2022). The field blocking on the interface with nonlinear response between nonlinear focusing media. Turkish Journal of Physics, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 6, 721–736. https://ajindex.com/articles/613998

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (28)

  1. Gorshkov, K. A.; Ostrovskiy, L. A.; Papko, V. V. J. Exper. Theor. Phys. 1976, 44, 306-311
  2. Nayanov, V. I. Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 1986, 44, 245-247
  3. Panyaev, S.; Sannikov, D. G. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2016, 33, 220-229
  4. Panyaev, S.; Sannikov, D. G. Computer Optics 2017, 41, 183-191
  5. Kivshar, Yu. S.; Agrawal, G. P. Optical Solitons: From Fibers to Photonic Crystals; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2003
  6. Carretero-González, R.; Cuevas-Maraver, J.; Frantzeskakis, D.; Karachalios, N.; Kevrekidis P.; Palmero-Acebedo F. Localized Excitations in Nonlinear Complex Systems; Springer Science & Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 2014
  7. Ahmediev, N. N.; Korneev, V. I.; Kuzmenko, U. V. J. Exper. Theor. Phys. 1985, 88, 107-115
  8. Boardman, D.; Shabat, M. M.; Wallis, R. F. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 1991, 24, 1702-1707
  9. Bludov, Y. V.; Smirnova, D. A.; Kivshar, Yu. S.; Peres, N. M. R.; Vasilevsky, M. I. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 89, 035406
  10. Aceves, B.; Moloney, J. V.; Newell A. C. Phys. Rev. A 1989, 39, 1809
  11. Aceves, B.; Moloney, J. V.; Newell A. C Phys. Rev. A 1989, 39, 1828
  12. Savotchenko, S. E. Condensed Matter and Interphases 2017, 19, 567-572
  13. Savotchenko, S. E. Bulletin of Voronezh State University Series Physics Mathematics 2018, 1, 44-52
  14. Alfassi, B.; Rotschild, C.; Manela, O.; Segev, M.; Christodoulides, D. N. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007. 98, 213901
  15. Dikshtein, E.; Nikitov, S. A.; Nikitov, D. S. Phys. Solid State+ 1998, 40, 1710-1714
  16. Men’shov, V. N.; Tugushev, V. V. J. Exper. Theor. Phys. 2001, 93, 786-795
  17. Men’shov, V.N.; Tugushev, V.V. Phys. Solid State+ 2002, 44, 1727-1735
  18. Kivshar, Yu. S.; Kosevich, A. M.; Chubykalo, O. A. Phys. Lett. A 1987, 125, 35-40
  19. Kivshar, Yu. S.; Kosevich, A. M.; Chubykalo, O. A. Phys. Rev. A 1990, 41, 1677-1688
  20. Savotchenko, S. E. Russian Phys. J. 2000, 43, 876-881
  21. Savotchenko, S. E. Russian Phys. J. 2004, 47, 556-562
  22. Krasilnikov, V. V.; Savotchenko, S. E. Phys. Stat. Sol. (C) 2004, 1, 2757-2760
  23. Savotchenko, S. E. Russian Phys. J. 2005, 48, 915-918
  24. Savotchenko, S. E. Russian Phys. J. 2006, 49, 177-182
  25. Davydov, A. S. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1977, 66, 379-387
  26. Bogdan, M. M.; Gerasimchuk, I. V.; Kovalev, A. S. Low Temp. Phys. 1997, 23, 197-207
  27. Gorentsveig, V. I.; Kivshar, Yu. S.; Kosevich, A. M.; Syrkin, E. S. Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur 1990, 16, 1472-1482
  28. Abdullaev, F. K.; Baizakov, B. B.; Umarov, B. A. Opt. Co